297
submitted 2 months ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

Kim Dotcom, who is facing criminal charges relating to the defunct file-sharing website Megaupload, is to be extradited to the US, the New Zealand justice minister has said.

German-born Dotcom has New Zealand residency and has been fighting extradition to the US since 2012 following an FBI-ordered raid on his Auckland mansion.

The justice minister, Paul Goldsmith, had signed an extradition order for Dotcom, a spokesperson said on Thursday.

“I considered all of the information carefully, and have decided that Mr Dotcom should be surrendered to the US to face trial,” Goldsmith said in a statement.

In a post on X on Tuesday, Dotcom said: “The obedient US colony in the South Pacific just decided to extradite me for what users uploaded to Megaupload,” in what appears to be a reference to the extradition order.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 months ago

People came on your land and broke the law.

YOU'RE RESPONSIBLE!

[-] AngryishHumanoid@reddthat.com 10 points 2 months ago

Not a good analogy. More like he set up a bunch of lockers on his land, and some people put drugs in them. Not as cut and dry.

[-] cornshark@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Wait is this for real? Liability works like this? I rent a storage unit -- does that mean I can send the owners of the storage company to jail if I put drugs in my unit?

[-] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

It's more like you had a storage unit, and let people do whatever they want with it, but it's implied it's used for illegal activity. And then you have full control to stop or prevent them from doing illegal activities, and choose not to.

[-] JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

"The mere fact of placing a copy on a shared directory in a computer where that copy can be accessed via a P2P service does not amount to distribution."

I know that is a Canadian ruling and the US might have a different take. Just saying that is a realistic interpretation.

[-] batmaniam@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

If it's determined there's liability, maybe. I don't know about jail but a victims family absolutely could sue in civil court in the US.

I don't know about specifics but there are absolutely cases and laws around determining when and if a storage company in this case should have known. Also for things like kids breaking into your derelict building and hurting themselves and a million other things.

Don't ask me to get into whether the laws around establishing liability are correct or ethical, I barley know any details in my own country let alone others (and what international treaties apply). But you asked a question and the answer is: it depends but, yes, sometimes.

[-] ulkesh@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

People can get injured on my land by actions they take, and I get sued. I’m not saying it makes sense.

But the dude knew full well what he was doing and profited off of piracy. The US has some things to say about that. But apparently no one can read that I said I don’t condone the US here. Maybe the word “condone” confuses people, I don’t know.

this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
297 points (98.1% liked)

News

23267 readers
2249 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS