this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2024
651 points (98.8% liked)

News

23276 readers
821 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 37 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Next thing, you're gonna tell me that water is wet.

[–] cynthorpe@discuss.online 22 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Water isn’t wet. Wetness is a property that occurs when a liquid adheres to a solid surface due to cohesive and adhesive forces. Water molecules exhibit hydrogen bonding, creating a network, but they themselves aren’t ‘wet’ until they interact with another material.

[–] just_ducky_in_NH@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] cynthorpe@discuss.online 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not everyone has a sense of humor.

[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

We still love you. Just keep being you.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Counterpoint: water is wet because it is the wet.

A powerful example of such a scenario is this quote from the philosopher, Batman:
"I am vengeance! I am the night! I.am.BATMAN!"

What this proves is shut up, water is wet. 😡

[–] cynthorpe@discuss.online 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

If there is water, and no one is around to be wet… is it still wet?

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Let's all just agree that water is moist. Oceans of moisture.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] towerful@programming.dev 4 points 3 months ago

The pope is jealous

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So you’re saying wet is water.

[–] cynthorpe@discuss.online 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No. It is the essence of wetness.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] cynthorpe@discuss.online 2 points 3 months ago

It’s essential.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Rain is wet, it is not adhered to a solid surface. The middle of the ocean is wet even if there's no solid surface near by.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Isn't it only wet after it touches you? You can anticipate it's wet, but the state would exist after contact.

[–] Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Aren't the molecules touching other molecules wet if it involves touch?

An individual h2o molecule can't be wet, but if two of them are touching, they are both wet.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Wet to the touch, not to each other. It changes the property of something else to make it wet.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A wall can be wet, it doesn't require a person to touch the wall before it can be called wet. So the sense of touch is not required for something to be wet.

It changes the property of something else to make it wet.

If the wall was dry and I add water to it I have changed this property, if the wall is already wet and I add water to it I have changed nothing. Therefore if I add water to something and do not change its properties then it was already wet in the first place.
If adding water to water does not change its properties then the water was already wet in the first place.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

As I said, it changes the property of something else, a person does not need to be involved.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

As I said, if adding water to water doesn't change the property, then the water was already wet.

[–] ABCDE@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

That doesn't make sense, it changes other things.

[–] cynthorpe@discuss.online -1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How would you know if it was wet if you’re not around

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If a tree falls in the forest does it make a sound?

I thought we were talking about science, not philosophy.
How do we know the properties of black holes, distract stars, and the early universe if we're not in them?

[–] cynthorpe@discuss.online 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So a person doesn't have to be physically present and interacting with something in order to know the physical properties of it.

[–] cynthorpe@discuss.online 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think it might be wet somewhere. But I am not there, and I cannot know unless I am there to experience the essence of wetness.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm not going to put much faith into an argument on "what is wet" from someone who isn't sure if a rock on the bottom of a pond is wet unless they reach in and touch it.

[–] cynthorpe@discuss.online 0 points 3 months ago

I’m not going to allow my eyes to become wet over someone who doesn’t understand that everything has been a joke.

[–] Maven@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I am of the opinion that a single molecule of water is not wet but since water makes other things wet... A molecule of water would make the surrounding molecules of water wet. Therefore pretty much any example you can give of water is wet unless you mean just a single molecule of water separated from anything else.

[–] cynthorpe@discuss.online 1 points 3 months ago

I’m going for a swim in the hydrogen bond.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So you're telling me that water makes things wet. That makes it wet as a verb, so flatter us in fact wet all the time

[–] cynthorpe@discuss.online 1 points 3 months ago

I am very dry, even when wet.