If you give some rich people a butt load of money they will tell a judge that the wind is the real culprit here. The blame truly belongs to a butterfly. If you give that judge some fancy rich people trips, they'll agree and that's perfectly legal and perfectly fine. If anything, noticing it and making the judge feel bad about it is the problem that really needs to be addressed.
If he flexs his newfound immunity he could definitely stir the pot.
The employment tribunal at London Central Court said Ms Gasparova's perception of events was "skewed". Her claims were rejected.
Saved you a click.
Uh oh. The SS better stage another quick phone upgrade so they can accidentally lose all the evidence again.
Knowing nothing of circumstances, I am willing to bet this happened because his Secret Service detail is staffed with loyalists instead of professionals.
I don't understand why using AI is what makes this illegal. I don't know the laws in Spain, but would it be illegal if they used a pencil or a paint brush? Seems like a weird line to draw if not.
From the people that brought you Fake News, we now present.... Fake School.
If you get them young enough, you can avoid that troublesome think for yourself phase.
I don't even understand what they're asking for here? Are they suggesting that the Supreme Court can overturn a state conviction? I didn't think that was allowed, but if any court is corrupt enough to do it I suppose it's this one.
Smell is how ants communicate with one another so maybe these ant sniffers will be the first humans who can speak ant.
Mare of Easttown springs to mind. It was pretty good and is a miniseries. 7 episodes that are about an hour each.