running_ragged

The redactions never travel as fast or far as the original message. They know this.

I found by googling the title w/ year

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0758762/

There is another person beside him and you can only see an elbow and the back of their head, which is what looks like a ponytail.

Can continuously loop over the file, examine the md5 hash for changes.

Run the script if it has changed.

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6475252/bash-script-watch-folder-execute-command

daemon() {
chsum1=""

while [[ true ]]
do
    chsum2=`find src/ -type f -exec md5 {} \;`
    if [[ $chsum1 != $chsum2 ]] ; then           
        if [ -n "$chsum1" ]; then
            compile
        fi
        chsum1=$chsum2
    fi
    sleep 2
done
}

I love your optimism.

But at some point, you have to look around and say this isn’t business as usual anymore right?

Maybe we’re not there for you yet, but have you set up your own lines where you can say, once they’ve crossed that line, it’s not okay?

My lines were way back when he promised to chase down dangerous criminals, and they started rounding up day labourers. When they tried to pretend due process was unnecessary and undeserved by the people they didn’t like.

When they deployed military units in domestic cities under the completely bogus claims of emergencies.

Nothing they say is true, because the only thing they treat as true, is whatever is most expedient to them in any given moment.

There is no legal or traditional way of running the government that is safe from their perverting intentions.

Congressional approval is kind of a forgone conclusion at this point isn’t it?

I don’t trust any of the safeguards in place to hold. Some might. Some won’t. The ones that fail will be abused to a greater and greater extent as they test their limits.

If that is all they are doing, it’s to normalize their presence. Until it isn’t all they’re doing anymore.

The improbability is irrelevant, since we couldn’t be here to wonder at, if the improbable didn’t happen.

You can trust them, because they aren't bound by the same chains as the mainstream media. That is where I get all my best news from. /s

Also notable : https://ca.news.yahoo.com/ex-national-enquirer-chief-details-202155831.html

David Pecker, former publisher of the National Enquirer, testified at Donald Trump’s hush money trial Tuesday about the “catch and kill” agreements between the former president and the tabloid, detailing arrangements involving Trump’s former doorman and an ex-Playboy model.

So it is actually kind of interesting that they'd be talking about this at all.

A lot of times places like that won’t look at you if you’re overqualified, because they don’t want to spend the time and effort to train you, knowing or expecting you to be looking elsewhere from day 1.

Slow your roll!

Sometimes words evolved for the spelling, sometimes for the sounds.

I think in this case it was for the fun sound, especially given it arose through tiktok communities.