rrrurboatlibad

joined 2 years ago
[–] rrrurboatlibad 14 points 1 year ago

Meh, it works for me. I like it here more than reddit. Sorry that you haven't found your groove. It toom me a while of finding the right things to subscribe and right folks to follow before my feed felt fun and interesting. I use Lemmy as a jumping off point for rabbit holes that are interesting to me

[–] rrrurboatlibad 2 points 1 year ago
[–] rrrurboatlibad 1 points 1 year ago
[–] rrrurboatlibad 16 points 1 year ago

This is a truly amazing post. Really inspired writing. Thank you for making me actually lol and forcing my wife to listen to me read it out loud

[–] rrrurboatlibad 11 points 1 year ago

Love this game. Its such a good experience

[–] rrrurboatlibad 2 points 1 year ago

I use my B&R bags aaalot and they're awesome. Money well spent

[–] rrrurboatlibad 4 points 1 year ago

Absolutely. Loved the first one

[–] rrrurboatlibad 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have no idea how I got here

[–] rrrurboatlibad 11 points 1 year ago
[–] rrrurboatlibad 194 points 1 year ago (8 children)

You should still set airplane mode when airborne for other reasons besides interference with the aircraft. For one, you'll save your battery. It takes a lot of "juice" for your device to search for cell towers that are likely out of reach. You may also want to avoid connecting to a tower outside where you have coverage. E.g. for a flight from Anchorage to Minneapolis, maybe you don't want to connect to Canadian cell towers and potentially receive charges in another country. Obviously this depends on your plan limits. But, yeah, it's not really about protecting the airplane, in most cases

[–] rrrurboatlibad 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This reply is meant to generate discussion. It is not sarcasm or meant to be taken negatively at all:

What is the purpose of any rules? Why have them? Is it possible to make a "perfect" rule or policy or public intervention whereby all affected persons are serviced fairly? Probably not. If you conclude we need rules, how do we balance their benefits with the disenfranchisement of some of the persons affected negatively?

In your specific case, how do you make the rules minimize negative outcomes without excessively sacrificing the potential positive outcomes?

I'm genuinely interested in your perspective from your age and place in time.

These are good and valid questions. If you're passionate about them, you may consider studying political science and/or law in the future. One day, if you're still passionate about this topic, you may be in a position to change the rules.

[–] rrrurboatlibad 4 points 1 year ago

Wow, amazing review! Entertaining and informative

view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί