logflume

which mall? i’ll come with i also need a new vacuum cleaner

got it. afaik antipsychotics don't have major negative interactions with most psychedelics since the actions are pretty different. i have heard anecdotally that antipsychs will severely reduce the effects of acid/shrooms.

be safe, test your drugs, don't overindulge, and you should be good to go.

what med and what psychedelic is it? for example something like LSD, it has few severe negative interactions, so you're likely to be in the clear, and something like MDMA has way more interactions and risk.

i hate this

good since i'm gonna quit my job

bad since i have to be around family for thanksgiving

"i'm not antisemitic" donates money to zionists

yea you aren't beating the allegations

that tracks that fucking tracks

i mean irl i'd rather be a subsistence farmer than a gold miner

you should change your diet either way tbh

Hamas has lobbyists and high ranking politicians spread throughout the world. There are right wing fanatical religious movements in different countries supporting Hamas. Hamas has broad support in the West and in Western media. Meanwhile, the Global South broadly condemns Hamas and supports…

wait sorry I got it flipped, that’s all Zionism

the worst tea ever already exists and it’s called rooibos

Once they become filthy rich, they have become part of the bourgeoisie. Hy filthy rich, I mean those that could stop working and simply live off of their “investments”. Classes in Marxism are not as rigid as say castes in India - the petit bourgeois class is a transitional class. You may be born a proletariat, but there is the tiniest sliver of hope that you could one day become bourgeois (what a joke).

Money itself is ownership. That is the allure of capitalism. Why does money accumulate interest in a HYSA? Is it doing work? You get paid dividends from stocks and stocks too appreciate over time. What are stocks but units of ownership? Earn enough and you are finally free.

As for those that are well off but not filthy rich, sure, they’re either petit bourgeois or labor aristocrats. I’d say most labor aristocrats have no real hope of actually having enough money to be considered bourgeois, so they are firmly proletariats. There’s probably a number, but I don’t know what that number is.