Who hasn't encountered that one jerk who builds only new code to impress management, and never maintains or fixes existing code? I think of them as proof-of-concept posers. They make things that look flashy, impress the execs, and barely work for a single use care, then dump all the bugs, maintenance and actual architecture on the other devs. LLMs are going to be a gift to these people and a pain for everyone who actually knows how to engineer things well. They'll encourage this kind of shallow flashiness and make the maintenance problems worse, but the execs will be convinced that only the LLM posers are productive and everyone else is sitting idle.
floofloof
Maybe I've just been lucky, but for several years and on several different machines I've found Linux just works, while Windows is an endless treadmill of frustration and brokenness.
There's always lying on the application then being quietly, passively obstructive.
Kimmel’s show Wednesday night began with a blistering monologue about Trump, the first 10 minutes concentrated on the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and Congress’ vote this week to release more material from Epstein’s correspondence. He noted the country was carefully following the movements of “Hurricane Epstein.”
Trump is very sensitive about this Epstein thing, isn't he? He reacts just like a pedophile rapist accomplice of Epstein's would.
Do they have to take the Texans?
Yes but it's surprisingly convincing given how it actually works. It's more impressive than useful, and it's a huge waste of energy.
rights
They misspelled "whites".
I thought you made a good point. I have decades of experience and I find LLMs useful for the things you described.
The demands of hype.