this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2025
164 points (96.1% liked)

LGBTQ+

4179 readers
18 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 72 points 2 days ago (5 children)
[–] lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone 39 points 2 days ago (1 children)

brave enough to stand up to terfs, cowardly enough to shrink away from saying murdered trans women were FUCKING MURDERED.

MURDERED. TRANS. WOMEN.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

People don't self-censor like that because they're squeamish about the word. They self-censor like that because they're trying to evade corporate social media content filters that would limit the visibility of their post.

[–] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Downvotes because of this, I do the same every time I read "unalive"

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 2 days ago

to be fair the original headline is:

Artist uses Harry Potter books to create powerful portraits of murdered trans women

murd3red might just be from trying to circumvent censorship on other social media sites, I assume TikTok, but I'm not sure (I don't use any social media like that).

[–] Boppel@feddit.org 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

this was probably made for posting on insta, youtube or some other shit platform thats to cowardly to call the things by their name. "advertisers don't like it when we talk about (insert something violence or sex related)". people will come up with the most unhinged words just to avoid having to deal with social media censorship.

[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, I understand the reasons. I just hate that people have decided to put up with this shit rather than leave those platforms. If a platform is censoring your posts for saying "die" or "vagina", then that should be a sign that it's time to abandon that platform. Yet people remain there and we end up with this complete wank.

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 2 days ago

it’s hard to have the same reach when you limit yourself to niche platforms tho. like sure, PinkNews could post exclusively to Pixelfed/PeerTube and not have to deal with censorship.

they’d also have to contend themselves with 12 followers… a hard pass when you’re a news org

[–] cornshark@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

No one can leave because that's where all the people are

[–] cornshark@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

It's called l33t, you wouldn't understand

[–] BananaOnionJuice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Good statement, use the transphobes works against her, how do they make the boks into those pictures?

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 2 days ago (2 children)

from the article:

Artist Tai Ericson, who lives in the US state of Vermont, began deconstructing the books to create the artworks in protest at JK Rowling’s views on trans people.

It looks like he cuts out letters from the pages and glues them together to form an image, you can see the detail on his website:

Thanks for linking to their site. I'm going to reach out and see if they need more old HP books.

[–] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 14 points 2 days ago

The compression or smoothing or whatever on the OP image did this artwork dirty, it’s beautiful.

[–] SuperDuperKitten@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My biggest bet is that Tai Ericson (The artist of that portrait) got Harry Potter second-hand somewhere which I sometimes see them in charity shops.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 days ago

or used his own personal copies, one article said he "repurposed" the books, which does imply he didn't buy new books to make the art

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 days ago

This is TRAGIC! That my Books are being Abused!

-JK Rowling!

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago