Thank you! That's what I was going for
dwemthy
Black Hole Sun
It's a play on the classic riddle:
You're walking on the beach with your good friend Jesus, huffing paint and dissociating. At one point you forget what you were doing and look over at Jesus, then back behind you at the sand. Behind you there's only one set of footprints. You ask Jesus why he left you and he looks directly at the you who is reading this, not the you who is in the story, and asks "Why do you think there's only one set of footprints?"
Answer
You were both hopping on one foot
Is this gain?
If NORAD can keep us safe from Santa they can keep us safe from anything
Oilrig
Tex-a-me
Tex-a-you
This is why I like to gather passive scores at the start of a session. Then regularly glance meaningfully at them and then at the player with the lowest score
Not in those words
I'm voting both pragmatically and with my conscience by voting for Claudia De La Crúz.
With the goal of
Removing legitimacy from the system itself, and forcing the DNC to appeal to the left
Is that not good? Or is it not real?
Or maybe it won't have that effect? Because that's an idealistic plan, not a pragmatic one
Says the guy advocating poorly applied electoralism
Lol, yes. There are metaphorical carrots pulling the DNC to the right, I think we agree there. Now if you want to be "pragmatic" about it will a metaphorical stick from the left move them more left, or more right given the way we can see they calculate?
What a concept