ShareMySims

A court [in the UK] has ruled that consent for two new Scottish oil and gas fields was granted unlawfully and their owners must seek fresh approval from the UK government before production can begin.

Which they will get, without a fucking blink, because our government is and always will be for the rich and their interests, and Keith has made it perfectly clear that he couldn't give two shits about the environment, nor even keeping up appearances that he cares.

And razors..

A. air travel isn't "psychotic", fuck off with that ableism and

B. he wouldn't be doing it once, he would be doing it 0.00000000000000001% of a time

So again:

spare me the “every little help” platitude, at the scales we’re discussing here, this person’s itinerary makes zero difference, and only serves to alleviate his personal guilt.

And apparently, some of yours, too!

Thanks, I hadn't scrolled down far enough.

I'd love it if you stopped putting words in my mouth.

So I'm glad he was compensated, but I struggle to take his stance seriously when he works for a neoliberal think tank and genuinely believes his personal travel arrangements make any difference whatsoever when someone like him should definitely be aware that billionaires emit more carbon pollution in 90 minutes than the average person does in a lifetime (spare me the "every little help" platitude, at the scales we're discussing here, this person's itinerary makes zero difference, and only serves to alleviate his personal guilt. The only difference we can make as individuals is to unite and tear down the systems that are actually destroying the planet, and the people responsible).

Just a point of note - the liberation by outside forces last time wasn't done for the benefit of those being exterminated (hell, every single one of the allies had a significant part in either rejecting refugees, or actively doing oppressing and outright exterminating of their own before the war even started), but for the benefit of those countries leaders, and finances.

So there might be liberation, but it'll only exist to enable us to return to "normalcy" which is the capitalist status quo that keeps leading to world wars (because they're that profitable).

No where is the word sex, or anything even implying sexiness or sexuality even mentioned (not in op, but also not even in the comments!).

The only thing the size of your butt is telling anyone else is how much fat you have in that part of the body.

There is nothing inherently sexual about butts, just like there's nothing inherently sexual about boobs. They just are.

The only one sexualising body parts here, is you.

Oh, I get it, I just think it plays in to their rhetoric more than it contradicts it.

They're grasping at any and every "he's not a nazi" straw they can find or make up, this just gives them another one to grasp to, because they wouldn't see or care about your intent, all they see is someone deliberately avoiding directly saying "musk is a nazi" or "what makes him a nazi is..", which is exactly their tactic and feeds in to their cognitive dissonance.

You're giving him the degree of separation they're looking for, which he does not deserve.

So again, I understand what you're trying to do, but I think that not explicitly saying "musk is a nazi because..." is counterproductive.

Yeah, I get where you're coming from, and I like your design (though agree it could be a little easier to read) but feel like this is playing in to the "he's not a nazi" narrative his supporters are trying to push, when he is in fact, a nazi, as well as a regime enabling industrialist. The two aren't mutually exclusive, and we should be calling the nazi spade a nazi spade at every opportunity.