MoonMoon

joined 2 years ago
[–] MoonMoon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The same table on the Wiki page says that the actual count was 289 murders in 2022. Japan had a population of over 126 million in 2020. If we used your formula, that would mean there were over 289,000 murders in Japan between 2021 and 2022. See below:

230 per 100,000 = 126,146,099 x 230 ÷ 100,000 = 290,136 murders total.

Whereas, 0.233 per 100,000 = 126,146,099 x 0.233 ÷ 100,000 = 294 murders total.

2+2=4, simple maths. But 290k murders per year would explain the population drop, lol.

[–] MoonMoon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

As the other guy mentioned, 0.23% per 100,000 doesn't make sense. That's like saying 0.23 murders per 100 (cent) per 100,000. One of those per Xs is redundant.

The Wikipedia page linked says Japan has a murder rate of 0.233 per 100,000 residents. If this made sense as a percent, it would mean a percentage of 0.000233%. But this statistic wouldnt work as a since a "percentage" implies a fraction of a whole, for example 50% of a population is born male.

The original statistic under discussion says that there are "X number of murder cases per 100,000 people living in country", rather than "Y% of the country's population is murder victims", which wouldn't make sense anyway since the dead aren't part of the population; i.e. you wouldn't see a statistic like "20% of the population is dead" but rather "20% of the population died", and "90% of the deaths were by murder" rather than "18% of the population is murder victims".

Thank you for attending my TED talk.

Edit: formatting

Edit: 0.233 murders per 100,000 residents (in 2022) = 126,146,099 (pop of Japan as per the 2020 census) x 0.233 ÷ 100,000 = 294 murders total. The wiki page says the actual count is 289, so the error is probably due the drop in population since the 2020 census.

[–] MoonMoon@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

Oo I like this better!

[–] MoonMoon@lemmy.world 44 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Theydies and themtlemen, welcome to the future!

[–] MoonMoon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Truly, a battle of dimwits.

[–] MoonMoon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I don't know if you're joking, but just for fun: Press-T-digi-tay-shun

[–] MoonMoon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

While we're at it, also Change Traffic Conditions!

[–] MoonMoon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I think this was at the bottom of a deep hole, as you can see where the plastic was cut around it. A standard bit and holder wouldn't fit down that, I don't think. What the other guys said about a flathead and dremel/grinding wheel is the only option really, but you'd have to be able to ID the little fucker first.

[–] MoonMoon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Ah, a fellow appreciator of the Imperium's finest bureaucracy.

Yup, gothic armada 2

[–] MoonMoon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Crushing the enemies of my beloved Emperor. Ending the lives of mutants, heretics, and aliens, one ship at a time.

The emperor protects, heretic.

[–] MoonMoon@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Praise Shejus

[–] MoonMoon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

For me its always been "limbs"

62
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by MoonMoon@lemmy.world to c/3dprinting@lemmy.world
 

My first attempt at a commercial 3D print: an asthma inhaler body that can flip into a slimmer form so it doesnt jut out and dug into legs or tear pants. What do you guys think?

Edit: Hi all, it seems like the general consensus is that this is a dangerous product. I really believed that I was making something helpful but that may not be the case. I have decided to take down the listing from Cults3D. Thank you for your feedback.

view more: next ›