[-] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

You definitely have some good ideas about an alternative system, but you also have some nonsense in that first paragraph.

The idea of someone deserving punishment is inherently dehumanizing. It's not possible to punish someone unless they are beneath you. Thinking another human is lesser than you defines them as less than human.

Hard lines of behavior? That's just what laws are, like we currently have. Yes, look at where we are now with the centuries long mentality of people deserving punishment. The rich and powerful are not subjected to the law in the same way because, to use your words, "authoritarian systems especially are prone to being taken over by groups with special interests, whoch not only guts their effectiveness but completely revrses their intended goals if they were noble ones." Seriously though, "hard lines of behavior" is an extremely authoritarian phrase.

There are no "evil people" there are only evil actions. Every single person has the capacity for evil. We're going to be stuck where we're at until we collectively recognize that truth.

[-] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

Of course protecting the public is the first priority, otherwise there just wouldn't be a justice system. But your willingness to label a person as evil keeps you open to calling whole groups of people evil (like say immigrants). That actually invites evil to yourself and society because 'prison is for evil people, I'm not in prison so I must not be evil' when in reality everyone is capable of evil and should always be guarding against those thoughts, not dismissing them as impossibilities.

[-] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee -3 points 5 days ago

You seem unable to separate rehabilitation / treatment for mental health from medical interventions and drugs.

What I'm arguing is that punishment is not justice. No person should have the right to dole out punishments to another. To think otherwise betrays a very authoritarian mindset.

I don't have a 500 page document detailing a new version of our justice system, partly because, as you correctly stated, there isn't a one size fits all solution. But I know whatever system that is should be focused on empathy and compassion, not making people pay for their misdeeds.

But even if I completely agreed with what you're saying, I would still think it's gross to cheer for anyone being sent to "an atrocity that needs to be dismantled and replaced", especially if it's for the rest of their lives.

[-] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I don't know why you think there's more autonomy in a mental institution than prison, or why you keep bringing up forcing drugs and surgery on people like that's the only way to help people with mental health issues. Your stance is still not making sense from a moral standpoint.

Edit: just want to note that the first sentence of the comment above wasn't there when reply was written

[-] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee 62 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

But she said “there were so many violations that it was impossible to detect them all”. She said: “We witnessed something very unusual: this was a total falsification, a total stealing of votes, using all the tricks that can be used to falsify elections, and on top of that – the use of modern technologies to whitewash the elections.

She said it was unprecedented, adding: “We were witnesses and victims of a Russian special operation, a new type of hybrid warfare waged against our people.>

[-] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee 62 points 3 months ago

People have already correctly answered that in this community there are no stupid questions, you're supposed to be able to ask anything without ridicule. But if you want to permit the general existence of stupid questions, here's the definition I've always used.

A stupid question is one you can easily answer yourself.

As in, any question due to real lack of knowledge is not stupid, but if you can answer your own question just by thinking about it for a second, then it wasn't necessary to ask and therefore "stupid”.

[-] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee 66 points 3 months ago

Be direct in communication when needed, otherwise just don't.

[-] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee 186 points 3 months ago

Yeah, 50% person actually restarted, 30% chance person is lying, 20% chance person just turned the monitor off and back on.

[-] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee 73 points 4 months ago

But she's right? I'm no fan of hers but this seems like an odd time to be dunking

[-] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee 57 points 9 months ago

It also has built in ads

[-] JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee 95 points 10 months ago

That looks like a lady in the men's room

24
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by JeSuisUnHombre@lemm.ee to c/the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

There are a couple replies I made that weren't replied to so maybe click on later toots to see some of those

Edit: I just clicked the link and it looks so different in browser. I'm talking about my "discussion" with the enlightened truth sandwich (Damn dunning-kruger for giving the most wrong people names that include "truth")

68

When I lie, it's most often a lie of omission. Are you more of a falsehood teller? Or do you lie out of ignorance? Or is there a particular subject you're likely to lie about? Or a person who you tell most of your lies to?

Do you always tell the truth? If yes what type of lie was that?

view more: ‹ prev next ›

JeSuisUnHombre

joined 1 year ago