Don't get me wrong, the gap is huge, but this graph is designed to misrepresent the information.
The scale starts at 45% and tops out at 60%. Even the bottom of the scale is only JUST below half, and the top is only 10% above it. The midway point is not the 50% mark, which one would expect to be the case for a graph showing percentages. So that low point is not the low point the graph insinuates, and the gap is only 15%, not the like 95% differential the graph insinuated until you start looking more closely.
The message is ultimately factual, but misrepresenting data to misrepresent vibes is still misinformation.
Sure, but if they said that aloud instead of continuing to deflect, they'd basically lose their whole identity.