FunkyStuff

joined 4 years ago
[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

But their exploiters don't fly a red flag. The state which flies a red flag, the democratically elected governments with extremely high approval ratings, are obviously not the exploiters.

If you go to Cuba and ask around, the problems people might have with the government are probably gonna be related to censorship, not exploitation. The blame for people's economic woes will, unless you talk with a very confused person, be placed on the US blockade. It might be true that for the Cubans who work in a private business, they're being exploited by their bosses, but that's really not a primary concern because the conflict between countries is a much larger issue for everyone in the island. That's true in most of the global south, really, the exploitation done by the owners of little enterprises is very small compared the the larger problem of a nation's resources and sovereignty being trespassed. Those are conditions that make the abolition of capitalist exploitation impossible.

I think that it makes sense for the people in the global south socialist countries to keep their trust in their democratic governments. They're individually incapable of launching some kind of assault on US empire to bring it down, so this is just necessarily a slow process where more places in the world will slowly break away from the US, and the empire will collapse in time. Until then, would it really make sense for anyone to light molotov cocktails in Beijing, Havana, or Caracas? You realize that's exactly what the CIA wants?

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 5 points 2 days ago (3 children)

But that's not what global south socialism is. If there is a global project to establish the sovereignty of exploited and impoverished nations, first with a combined effort of the national bourgeoisie with the workers and the peasantry, socialists across the world should support it. That's what's already happened and you can clearly see that the power the national bourgeoisies gained in the global south after throwing off the yoke of colonialism was either itself significantly weakened through socialist revolution, or it grew to the point of facilitating continued extraction as neocolonies. In the case of the nations that had socialist leadership curb the power of the new bourgeoisie (Cuba, Nicaragua, Burkina Faso, Vietnam, Tanzania, etc) none of them were able to simply do away with capitalist exploitation entirely. Demanding that they do such a thing is ahistorical, and it misses the point of their revolutions as being, principally, about taking political power into the hands of the people and away from colonizers. Should all of those projects be condemned because they didn't have a time machine to jump 800 years in the future to the point where they could avoid all those problems entirely?

It's completely non-actionable and facile to apply criticism of every socialist nation on the basis that some form or another of exploitation still exists inside of them. If there was a way to have the productive forces to get everyone fed, housed, and healed overnight then sure, you're totally right! It's abhorrent that some workers in Cuba work in private businesses that make profit off their surplus value! They should simply abolish the value-commodity form!

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

I think It's a mutually beneficial relationship. The state can hurt the billionaires, and they can hurt the state. Both of these come at a cost to oneself, so they prefer cooperating for their class interest.

I guess I don't think you are totally incorrect but this is a bad analysis regardless. You're painting this as if it was a totally reciprocal and symmetric situation. The US state is totally subservient to the billionaire class: this is evident in its financial policy, foreign policy, down to the way elections are run. The actions you may point to as counterexamples are either capitalist infighting (e.g. the tech capitalists cannibalizing media, monopolization) or the state pushing one capitalist in line to protect the collective interests of all the others. In any long term frame, the US state does nothing but protect its capitalists. That's what the state exists to do.

Like Chinese billionaires do with their party partners. It's only the ones who cause too much of a ruckus due to greed that get cut down. The others are coddled, like every other capitalist project.

These 2 sentences are an error that can only be made by missing the forest for the trees as you did in the beginning of your reply. Do you really think the PRC operates with the same guiding principles and historical outlook as the imperialist US state? Looking at the news must be very confusing for you!

Also, you reject Cuban socialism? Do you think socialism is supposed to exist in the real world or is it just for intellectual masturbation?

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 2 points 2 days ago

A friend of mine had this problem but he started going just by "Koba" and it's fine now.

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago (7 children)

You think in the US the state controls the billionaires?

Also I'm pretty sure Cuba is still socialist even though billionaires exist outside of Cuba. Hell, some of those billionaires might somehow own shares in enterprises that exist in Cuba, which would mean there's workers in Cuba being exploited by capitalist billionaires. Does that make Cuba no longer socialist? Would it become not-socialist if the billionaires were Cuban instead (which would be preferable to being exploited by foreign imperialists, by the way)?

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 3 points 2 days ago

I think it's a case of games being much more of a timesink than a lot of other media. Couple that with the weird kind of factionalism of the gaming community and you get this attitude where people really need their special toys to receive high praise, and they're so bought-in on those toys that seeing other toys get praise makes them jealous.

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

let's delve into it

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 4 points 2 days ago (9 children)

Is there some substantial way in which billionaires in China have political power and conform a ruling class? Because I figure in the US billionaires are the ruling class, the president is one, yet in China billionaires are always scared that they are at the people's mercy and can have it all taken away at any point.

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I feel like someone who decides to argue their point by saying that the two big bad guys from their 9th grade world history class were "buddy buddy" isn't really looking to make a serious case for anything.

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago

"Do your kids know you beat your wife?"

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 13 points 2 days ago

I thought this site had rules for opsec? I'm being doxed.

 

The toll is 50¢

 

Mods take this down if it belongs in slop, the headline itself is already very inflammatory and bad journalism.

Authorities are investigating whether Tyler Robinson, suspected of killing Charlie Kirk, believed Kirk's views on gender identity were "hateful" to people like Robinson's transgender roommate, six sources familiar with the case tell Axios.

Why it matters: Investigators believe Robinson's anger at Kirk's views could be a key to establishing a motive for the slaying of the controversial activist whose death sent shockwaves through American politics.

Each of the six sources familiar with the investigation told Axios that investigators believe Robinson had a romantic relationship with his roommate.

Zoom in: Axios' sources said investigators initially wanted the information about the roommate's gender identity kept quiet because that person is being "extremely cooperative" with authorities.

The roommate was "aghast" at the slaying when speaking to investigators and shared electronic messages sent by Robinson, one of the sources said.

"That's what happened? Oh my God, no," the roommate said, according to the source. "Here are all the messages."

The phone messages indicated a sender listed as "Tyler" had mentioned that after the shooting, he had wrapped his rifle in a towel and stashed it in some bushes near Utah Valley University, where the shooting occurred, Gov. Spencer Cox said Friday during a news conference.

"Tyler" also told the roommate in writing that the rifle would have to be retrieved, Cox said.

Between the lines: Federal and state law enforcement officials also are examining leftist groups in Utah to see whether they had knowledge of the alleged shooter's plans beforehand, or if they lent material support to him afterward.

One of those groups eliminated its social media profile after the shooting, Axios has learned.

The motive and political ideology of Robinson, 22, are subjects of intense online debate. Some conservatives have insisted he's an unhinged leftist. Liberals have pushed back by pointing to Robinson's conservative upbringing in Utah.

In a Daily Mail interview Friday, family matriarch Debbie Robinson said the family supports President Trump's MAGA movement.

"Most of my family members are Republican, she said. "I don't know any single one who's a Democrat."

Family members have told reporters that Tyler Robinson had become "more political" in recent years, and had expressed interest in Kirk's visit to the Utah Valley campus in Orem, Utah.

Cox said a Robinson family member had told investigators that the accused shooter recently had a conversation in which someone said Kirk "was spreading hate and was full of hate." But it was unclear from Cox's remarks who actually made that statement.

LGBTQ activists have criticized media outlets for erroneously reporting in the hours after the shooting that a bullet casing from the scene included a message related to transgender people.

Zoom out: Kirk, who toured college campuses and challenged progressive students to debate him under a tent that said "Prove Me Wrong," was an outspoken opponent of gender-affirming surgeries for minors and transgender athletes competing in women's sports. What they're saying: "It's pretty clear that Robinson's roommate knew a lot and didn't say anything after the killing, so they're a person of interest officially and are cooperating," a second official said. "We want to keep it that way."

"What we want to know is if anyone else had knowledge [of the shooting], before or after," that source said.

 

Right there next to calling someone deeply unserious.

 
 

ever said about us on wider Lemmy

 

marx-hi

11
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by FunkyStuff@hexbear.net to c/games@hexbear.net
 

Update is out next Thursday.

They added act 4.

They're removing the cruel difficulty (previously you had to run through acts 1-3 twice consecutively, now you run 1-4 + 3 small "interlude acts" that serve as fodder to level you up)

They added new tiers to support gems and removed the restriction that stopped you from having multiple of the same type supporting different skills.

They added a new auction house system that allows trading buying items from other players with no need for them to accept the trade, so if an item is listed on the trade site you may always buy it instantly.

There's a lot of balance changes and additions to the crafting system, too. It's looking like a biiiiig patch.

Announcement site

yummy time to line up for the slop!

view more: ‹ prev next ›