64

I thought that during the 2020-2024 interim the Democrats were supposed to be building someone up for the next generation of the party. To no one's surprise, they've been doing exactly fuck-all for four years - but, for insiders who actually care about the party's future, who are they hanging their hat on? Voters' confidence in Kamala has tanked; Cuomo was maybe their man until the sexual harassment charges hit (side question: how was he able to skate on the nursing home scandal?). But anyway, who's the next empty neoliberal they'll run in future elections?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Dolores@hexbear.net 50 points 3 months ago

its fukin Newsom, cmon, all the ghoul of Biden in a new sexy body. i'd say he had a good chance this cycle but he's a good dog waiting his turn

[-] BoxedFenders@hexbear.net 20 points 3 months ago

Yep, he's exceptionally disciplined at toeing the party line and prioritizing the Democratic machine over his own immediate wishes. They will reward his patience handsomely when it is His Turn.

[-] Dolores@hexbear.net 22 points 3 months ago

i really have got a sense that "their turn" is legitimately a driving principle in the party, either at Obama or Bernie the party got together and reorganized to prevent an upstart who didnt do their time from ever touching power again.

anyone else, even Bernie would tow the important political lines. the loyalty to Biden is about this turns bullshit

[-] BoxedFenders@hexbear.net 18 points 3 months ago

And no one exemplifies this better than Biden himself who had been paying his dues to the party since disco was popular.

[-] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 44 points 3 months ago

there is no one "after biden". all hope is hung on this man, the most progressive force in american politics since Franklin Delveccio Roosevelt. or is he the most imperialist, racist force in american politics since Theodore Roosevelt? i can't remember, but facts don't matter. what matters is that this is the last election america will ever have, because if Trump wins it's all over. for everyone. Trump will launch the space nukes to every corner of the galaxy and destroy everything that could have ever been imagined over an infinite timeline. including God. Trump will kill God. and most importantly, brunch. so press 30330 to give $3 to Team Biden and don't forget you can win big at goldenpalacecasino.com

so vote

ps - i have no idea. in 2016, hedges said in some interview that the Democratic party would rally around the conservative candidate and use the corrupt party mechanisms to kill the youthful, engaged energy around Sanders, the closest thing it had to an insurgent populist movement. this backroom dealing would lead to a profound disillusionment among many of the politically-engaged people who would have made up the future base of the party. the loss of this bloc would create a fatal wound in the party itself.

i think that's what we're seeing. the party is a corpse that is twitching on the slab and no amount of threatening, scolding, pomp, or pageantry seems capable of making young people give a shit. no one wants to be a labor-oriented, populist reform candidate, because the party bosses have shown they will scorch the earth to cut them down, so all we get are people in thrall to capital formations selected by the weird focus group/consultant-driven court intrigue of party elites and major donors. and those people don't want to put up names until there's a good chance of Return on Investment. so its just going to be one brushed and polished coward after another, pulled from a hat at the last minute and dumped on a saddle in the horse race. name TBD.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Wertheimer@hexbear.net 39 points 3 months ago
[-] Mindfury@hexbear.net 17 points 3 months ago

unleash the chicago fatman

[-] footfaults@hexbear.net 13 points 3 months ago

Kingpin, but no character and no charisma

[-] Coolkidbozzy@hexbear.net 35 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

a jungle primary between beto, pete, stacey abrams, newsom, some random senators, the worst billionaire you have ever seen, and eventually AOC probably

they will rally behind newsom after pete proves to be too unlikeable

[-] Blockocheese@hexbear.net 11 points 3 months ago

Going purely off vibes, I always felt like rat boy could be groomed into their perfect candidate. It wouldn't be that much work

[-] axont@hexbear.net 22 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

yeah the average person looks at Pete and visibly recoils in disgust. He'd be a Democrat version of DeSantis. He does well to his specific crowd, white comfortable nerds who work at Deloitte, but everyone else just sees a robotic weird rat man. Horrendous vibes emanate from him.

I mean I wouldn't put it past the democrats to put their chips behind him, but normal people see his entire vibe as fake corporate mandatory fun overly sentimental nothingness. He's a physical manifestation of Patrick Bateman. People don't look at Pete and see themselves, they look at Pete and see their weirdest supervisor at work. They see debate club nerds who they used to bully. They see a guy who would have worn a bow tie to elementary school

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] laziestflagellant@hexbear.net 35 points 3 months ago

They'll crack open one of the same brand of birthing vats that Buttigieg squelched out of, this time less gay and more boring looking. This procedurally generated and Langley gestated homunculus will be the only available option

[-] duderium@hexbear.net 29 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It’s her turn hillgasm

For real though it doesn’t even matter who they run. The democrats are petite bourgeoisie who believe whatever the corporate press tells them. They’ll fall in line behind whatever dogshit candidate the DNC chooses because whoever the RNC chooses will somehow be worse even though they’ll actually be the same, just with slightly different definitions of what constitutes politeness.

[-] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 28 points 3 months ago

That fact that you’re asking means you’re a Russian shill. We don’t speak of anyone EXCEPT Biden. He will be president. That’s all that matters. Stop talking about long term plans because there is a cheeto about to be put into a prison cell.

[-] BlueMagaChud@hexbear.net 26 points 3 months ago
[-] Robert_Kennedy_Jr@hexbear.net 24 points 3 months ago

Gavin Newsom has been doing some serious auditioning the past year or two.

[-] Breath_Of_The_Snake@hexbear.net 21 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Liz from TrueAnon needs to stop being coy about the Newsom conspiracy she’s hinted at having inside knowledge of. The man is going to run eventually.

[-] Robert_Kennedy_Jr@hexbear.net 13 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I mean just the first minute and a half of this clip makes him sound like he's been preparing his speeches in the mirror while applying his daily bottle of hair gel. It's like he's absorbed some Trump mannerisms the past few years.

https://youtu.be/CSzxlcrMgxo?si=5ASqNSYkrHg9eh8x

[-] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 11 points 3 months ago

Holy shit he's a neolib android dream. He's plasticky. He gave me a vibe of a casual president in some insanely shit Hallmark tv movie called Me and the President Fell in <3. If you turn the sound off - you can make up dialog in your head and pretend it is that movie and he's trying to seduce her.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSzxlcrMgxo&t=67s

1:07 "This is the real thing! You know how much I care for you. But it's more than that. I love you!..."

1:16 He does an impression of her mom telling him "Gavin, you are the man for her. She needs more than anything..."

I don't know what the actual audio is. I like my version much more than whatever it is. Still - what the fuck was up at 1:16!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Breath_Of_The_Snake@hexbear.net 11 points 3 months ago

Trying to be a blue Reagan it seems like

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Beetle_O_Rourke@hexbear.net 24 points 3 months ago
[-] adultswim_antifa@hexbear.net 21 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's probably going to be 4 more years of Trump and this guy's guaranteed to be scoring consistently on technicalities and procedure the entire time. He will lose every state to Tucker Carlson, who will be getting his show on Fox News back thanks to an executive order on Trump's first day in office.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BynarsAreOk@hexbear.net 18 points 3 months ago

Newsom visited China, he was present at the SF meeting with Xi, seems like the most obvious pragmatic answer.

[-] sexywheat@hexbear.net 16 points 3 months ago

They'll never run him, he actually thinks people deserve health care.

[-] Parsani@hexbear.net 15 points 3 months ago

At one point even Nancy Pelosi wanted single payer healthcare in the 90s, the dems can mold Newsom in their image

[-] ProletarianDictator@hexbear.net 10 points 3 months ago

Didn't he veto California's public option?

[-] HarryLime@hexbear.net 18 points 3 months ago

I mean, if I were in some kind of monkey's paw situation where I was put in charge of the democrats but I had to ignore my ideology and just put in someone who could win, there are actually a couple of really solid electoral options. The upper midwestern states that Trump won in 2016 have popular democratic governors, notably Gretchen Whitmer in Michigan and Josh Shapiro in Pennsylvania. Shapiro even got some good press for handling a bridge collapse really competently. Other than that, Raphael Warnock is a Georgia senator who's won multiple tough re-election campaigns despite being dragged down by that moronic grifter Stacy Abrams. Mark Kelly is a senator from Arizona who's a former astronaut and won a tough re-election.

The thing about this moment is that it should be really easy for mainstream democratic party liberals to just sweep the whole country and ride to the White House because of Dobbs/Trump being incredibly unpopular/Republicans being loathsome and unappealing and getting more unappealing all the time. The problem for them is squarely on Biden.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] footfaults@hexbear.net 16 points 3 months ago

Whoever it is, they're going to just harangue everyone into vooooting for them no matter how much they suck

[-] AntiOutsideAktion@hexbear.net 16 points 3 months ago

They're going to pick some aide or state assembly person (or a couple) to give a speech at the DNC this year and try to recreate an Obama 2004 moment

[-] PM_ME_YOUR_FOUCAULTS@hexbear.net 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's Eric Swalwell's turn

Real Swaheads know what the fuck is up

[-] Leon_Grotsky@hexbear.net 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Unfortunately, Mr. Swalwell has already been compromised by the perfidious Chinese and is, therefore, unelectable.

obama-sad

spoilerwaow-based

[-] RION@hexbear.net 10 points 3 months ago

It's brappin time

[-] ToxicDivinity@hexbear.net 15 points 3 months ago
[-] EstraDoll@hexbear.net 14 points 3 months ago

at the current trajectory of liberal politics in this country? Jefferson Davis's exhumed corpse

[-] Manalith@midwest.social 13 points 3 months ago

I don't really pay attention to politics, but I thought the smart play would've been backing one Mr. Psychedelic Warlord, but at this point I think that ship has sailed.

[-] axont@hexbear.net 19 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Yeah Beto has also been vocally anti-Israel lately as well, but he's also not had any hope of a legitimate political career lately. That can't be making him friends with Democrats. He kept losing every race he was involved in, so the donors dried up.

Also in the 2020 primary there were so many candidates he had to pigeon-hole himself to one particular issue to be notable, he tried being the anti-gun guy. He did the thing Democrats aren't supposed to do which is confirm what Republicans think of them. Democrats are usually more submissive and conciliatory to Republicans. When accused of being anti-gun Democrats are supposed to be like "oh well uh, well, yeah you're right mr. republican we should still protect the blah blah." Instead Beto was outright saying "yeah we are coming for your guns, no one needs an assault rifle" and that probably didn't make him friends among the rich donor class who actually control everything

They went with Biden because they simply don't have anyone left

[-] reddit@hexbear.net 13 points 3 months ago

Previously I'd always said Buttigieg but a Newsom/Buttigieg ticket would not surprise me at all either, I am just assuming the rat will still be involved. AOC will be an even more controlled opposition than Bernie was, she'll spend the primary talking about how the frontrunner doesn't go far enough then she'll get in line and endorse around February 2028.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bigboopballs@hexbear.net 12 points 3 months ago

hopefully the United Sates will be dissolved by then and nobody will have to think about it

[-] tactical_trans_karen@hexbear.net 10 points 3 months ago

I'm calling it, the next dem ticket will be Newsom/Whitmer

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2024
64 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

22692 readers
139 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS