138
submitted 3 months ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

The US judge overseeing Donald Trump's hush-money case in New York City has written a letter to prosecutors and the former president's defence team about a Facebook post in which a person claims to have known the jury's decision before it became public.

Justice Juan Merchan's letter says that on Friday "the court became aware of a comment" on the court's Facebook page, "now labeled as one week old" from a user named "Michael Anderson".

"My cousin is a juror and says Trump is getting convicted," the post says, according to the judge. "Thank you folks for all your hard work!!!"

BBC News has not verified the post, which has been deleted, or the claims allegedly made within it.

The Manhattan District Attorney's Office and Todd Blanche, Trump's lead attorney, did not respond to requests for comment.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] KeraKali@lemmy.world 124 points 3 months ago

"According to US media, the post was made by a now-deleted account that regularly trolls the social media pages of the New York court system."

Hopefully this is true and nothing comes of it.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

When was the account created, I wonder. Just in time for the trial? Created in order to do this very thing and disrupt the trial?

[-] solidgrue@lemmy.world 59 points 3 months ago

Prediction: this will be the basis of their appeal.

If I'm wrong, I shall record the fry-up and consumption of a delicious bratwurst.

[-] Good_fighter_guy@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

Yeah look you should do a practice run on that, just in case

[-] solidgrue@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

It's never a bad day for bratwurst, hey??

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

And if you're right, you're still eating that bratwurst, right?

[-] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 months ago

What happens off-camera stays off-camera

[-] aleph@lemm.ee 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's a bit premature to be making that prediction. If no further evidence comes forth that it isn't a random shitposter, then it's a complete nothingwurst.

[-] Cincinnatus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

No need to appeal if this is true. The judge will more than likely have to declare a mistrial

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

If this is true that may have been the whole intent of the comment.

[-] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 months ago

I don't get it? What is the news here. Someone made a random post on Facebook? Surely a million others also posted with blind certainty that he was going to be convicted, just as a few other millioka must have posted he wouldn't. What makes this instance different? Is this the glitch to get out of jail free? Just rob a bank and ask your cousins to make a post saying he know you'll be convicted!

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 21 points 3 months ago

If the claim in the comment is true it means a juror broke the secrecy rules, and this could make it a mistrial, essentially. I'm guessing they need to find this commenter and work out if what they were saying is true or if it was a troll.

[-] Corigan@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago

For fuck sake.... This cannot be the first time someone trolls the court. So anytime sometime happens just make a fake account to plant doubt and go for a mistrial. Like 5mins and a VPN and anyone can get off Scott free if you can afford a lawyer to move for a mistrial. Like fuck this shit.

Stop giving this man outs, stop making a joke of the justice system.

[-] jwt@programming.dev 5 points 3 months ago

"If the claim is true", means they have to connect the account to someone related to a juror first. So if you make a troll post using a VPN, nothing will come of it (and rightly so).

[-] Pfeffy@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Right? Couldn't somebody just post "I'm Michael Anderson's cousin and he's full of shit" and that would balance out the original post since they are both just made up?

[-] VogonFrost@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

It has already been debunked by MeidasTouch.

[-] p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world -3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Annnnnnd there it is, folks. This is how he worms out of this situation.

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Is this person verifiably their cousin?not likely.

[-] p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world -3 points 3 months ago

Doesn't need to be their actual cousin. All it takes is some greased palms and fudged paperwork, and anyone could be related to one of the jurors. Given all his trump bullshit, I would not put it past him and his cult of cronies to do that or something similar.

this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2024
138 points (96.0% liked)

News

22876 readers
3830 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS