4 climbers dead Mount Everest, 1 missing; ice collapse among factors cited (www.usatoday.com)

submitted 5 months ago by Wilshire@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 25 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 35 points 5 months ago

The mountain is covered in unrecoverable corpses, trash and literal human shit, it's deadly, it's freezing cold, there's almost no oxygen, and there's a line to get to the peak once you get there. The only reason to keep this nonsense up is that it gives the Sherpas money they would otherwise not have and they're poor enough as it is.

Seriously though, why bother even if you love mountain climbing? Sure, it's the highest point on the planet, but wouldn't you rather climb something more pristine?

[-] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 5 months ago

something more pristine

don‘t give them any ideas. Better they continue climbing that trash heap

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I'm sure there's some mountain somewhere that isn't considered incredibly sacred that they could cover in corpses and human shit.

[-] bungalowtill@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 months ago

I‘d voluntarily offer one of our also fucked up Bavarian mountains.

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 27 points 5 months ago

i only feel bad for the guides who are forced to do it for monetary reasons.

everyone else can get fucked for attempting everest. youre part of the problem.

[+] FaceDeer@fedia.io -8 points 5 months ago

The guides aren't slaves, they don't have to do it. They're probably better aware of the risks than the climbers they're guiding, for that matter.

[-] deranger@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yeah, just live in poverty instead. They’re practically forced to because nobody can turn down that money. You going to let your extended family starve?

These tourists pay huge sums of money; do you think it’s fairly distributed? Do you think the rich assholes treat these highly skilled mountaineers well? Despite all that, and the danger, they still do it because it’s good money. There’s not many high paying jobs in Tibet.

I still feel bad for the exploited sherpas. They’re in a shitty situation. This isn’t just as easy as “it’s a personal decision”, which is a fucked up perspective imo.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io -2 points 5 months ago

According to Wikipedia there's ~600,000 Sherpas in the world. Are you seriously saying that the only thing they can do to avoid poverty is work as Everest guides (or have an extended family member doing it)?

[-] deranger@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I’m not talking about the Sherpa people, but rather the profession of Sherpa which is a subset of these people. There aren’t even 600k Sherpa (people) globally. A few hundred Sherpa (profession) handle Everest.

And yes, that’s what I’m saying. Tibet is a poor country. What industry aside from Everest tourism do they have?

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io -2 points 5 months ago

So a few hundred Sherpa (profession) would be completely unable to find other jobs, like their hundreds of thousands of bretheren have somehow managed to do.

Look, I don't want people to die on Everest. But nobody is forced to go there, not even the Sherpas. They choose to go there. They know what they're getting into and what the risks are. If you're going to feel bad for them then you should also feel bad for the climbers, and vice versa.

[-] deranger@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

If you're going to feel bad for them then you should also feel bad for the climbers, and vice versa.

I don’t think so. This is an asymmetric relationship. It’s been documented time and time again the tourists treat the sherpas like shit. There’s also plenty of evidence they treat the mountain like shit, a mountain which is sacred to the Sherpa people. No, I don’t think I’ll feel bad for those who litter in what should be a pristine location and treat the locals poorly.

(Side note, I don’t even know what to call that extra vice versa. It’s like a vice versa double negative. You were already in vice versa mode by suggesting I should also feel bad for the tourists.)

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 1 points 5 months ago

Perhaps the Sherpas shouldn't be enabling them.

And actually, my point is just that you should feel equally bad for them. They're both people who chose to be there and they're both people that died. If you don't want to feel bad for them then that's fine too.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago

the tourists treat the sherpas like shit.

I submit it's the shitty tourists being shitty, and either selection bias or toxic generalizations is filling in the rest for you .

[-] deranger@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 months ago

Nope. There’s a good documentary called Sherpa you should check out. Also - why do so many people know who Sir Edmund Hillary is, but not Tenzing Norgay? They both were the first up there. Sherpas have been treated poorly as long as people have been summiting the mountain.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago

Every corpse on the Mount Everest once was a very dedicated and determined person.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

I would have thought that until I read Jon Krakauer's book about people ascending Everest, Into Thin Air, which includes a lady the Sherpas basically carried up.

So some of them could be lazier than you think.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Lost at Russian roulette

[-] BugKilla@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

And of course they put aside enough money to have their corpses removed and all the rubbish they took up with them....right? Self indulgent, ego stroking narcissism is what this is. They could have used their wealth to help community development programs in Nepal and pushed for making Everest a restricted world heritage site.

[-] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Yeah, they could have, but an Instagram photo is what they preferred. The movie Idiocracy is a documentary, seriously.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago

You're gonna need all three countries declare it so.

[-] Muscar@discuss.online 5 points 5 months ago

Title gore

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago

True. At least an attempt was made, with a semi-colon. But for the missing word, it's almost readable.

[-] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 5 months ago

oh well

[-] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Oh no! Another rich person caring more about an Instagram photo then the environment on the mountain and the wellbeing of their sherpas has died! Aaaaanyway.

My thoughts go to the sherpas.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago

an Instagram photo then the environment

Well, at least they cared about the environment, even if only after the photo.

this post was submitted on 24 May 2024

72 points (91.9% liked)

World News

38970 readers

2216 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Recommendations

How to spot Misinformation and Propaganda

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

quinten@lemmy.world

NewsAutoMod@lemmy.world

jordanlund@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

lemmyAtom@lemmy.world

FlyingSquid@lemmy.world