this post was submitted on 23 May 2024
84 points (74.7% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2825 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 63 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Because it's not true. Wall Street and the wealthy are thriving, the rest of us not so much.

No amount of gaslighting from the government is gonna help pay those bills

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago (7 children)

Did you read the article? Now, before you reflexively downvote me for saying something you didn't want to hear, hear me out.

Whether an economy is "good" or "bad" is measured through several metrics. These are—

  • Stock index performance
  • Unemployment rate
  • Inflation rate
  • Wage growth
  • People's personal financial situation

Now, stock index performance generally benefits the wealthy more than it benefits the average American, however, the article does note that the number of Americans who own 401(K) investments, which benefit from better stock index performance, has increased significantly in recent years.

The unemployment rate is definitely tied to middle-class wealth. It means that everyone who is looking for a job is eventually able to find a job. Unemployment is low, and this is good for the middle and lower class.

The inflation rate is currently just north of 3%. This is above the target 2% rate but not by much, and certainly less than the 7-9% inflation experienced immediately post-pandemic, and the US cooled inflation down to that level far faster than other Western economies (e.g. the UK and Eurozone). The inflation rate measures the price change of a basket of household goods, and the burden of high inflation is basically borne by the entire middle class. Low inflation is good for the middle and lower class.

I don't believe the article discussed wage growth, but wage growth has actually outpaced inflation in recent years due to a surge in worker power. This requires little introduction. The problem is that when people's wages rise, they give all the credit to themselves and think "Well, I'm just one of the hardworking and lucky ones." This is not true. A lot of people are getting pay raises, and employers are more willing to be generous with pay raises when the economy is good. In short, people credit increases in wages to their own hard work but blame inflation on the Government.

As stated in the article, most of the people surveyed reported that their personal financial situation improved, but they still think the overall US economy is bad. If this isn't definitive proof of what I've said earlier (that the economy is good and people just don't know it), I don't know what is

Economists are not stupid. They know that economic growth is driven by the everyday consumer and that a good economy is one that benefits the average American, not just billionaires. Understand that people on the news fixate on stock indexes because it's a single number that requires little explanation and leaves no room for nuance. When people with decades of education and experience in economics say the economy is good, we'd best listen. Rejecting this conclusion is the same Dunning-Kreuger-laced thinking that causes climate change deniers to deny the existence of that phenomenon.

[–] Psychodelic@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

Sorry, if this feels legit impossible to believe. I live in SoCal and literally everyone I know is struggling or has commented about how much more expensive rent is and how impossible it seems to get by compared to just a few years ago. Lots of people have to live with their parents/families now even though they work full time.

What do you or "economists" call it when no one (exaggerating here in case it's not obvious) in a city/state can afford rent to live on their own like they used to be able to? Put another way, what do you call it when six figures used to mean stability and now it means paycheck to paycheck for many families?

You're seriously saying people are just confused about their finances? What about all the articles about people not buying new cars and not buying this or that anymore? Why do economists think that is? That's just a coincidence?

[–] Seleni@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Rich people are doing good. Poor people are taking on credit card debt to buy basic groceries. People haven’t seen raises in years, or got them only on paper (for example, I got a raise, and then in the next breath got my hours cut to where it was actually a pay cut).

If people are struggling to buy basic necessities, they won’t spend on other things, which will slow the economy.

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Most of what you said is false when generalised to the entire economy.

It might be true for you. It's not true for most other people. You are trying to defeat a statistic with an anecdote.

[–] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Did you even read the post you are responding to???

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] cmeu@lemmy.world 45 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Because everything costs so fucking much that the "economy" doesn't represent their daily experience

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mandelbrotvurst@lemmy.world 44 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Because it costs me $60 to walk into the fucking grocery store.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 27 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Well, buy less than 4 things next time. Sheesh

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago

2Avacados2 furious.

Coming this summer

[–] 01011@monero.town 43 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Wall Street =!= "The Economy"

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The article states that most people surveyed said their personal financial situation improved but they still think the economy is bad.

Let that sink in. Most people say they are better off, but most of them still think the economy is bad. They know that they themselves are doing good but think it sucks for everyone else.

[–] Psychodelic@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (3 children)

In the telephone survey of 1,818 adults Aug. 10-14, 71% of Americans described the economy as either not so good or poor. And 51% said it's getting worse.

But 60% said their financial situation is good or excellent.

Come the fuck on dude. How can you possibly believe that? And who's upvoting all your comments?

Everything you say now is suspect if you can believe that data is representative of most Americans. Not only that, you're parroting the info everywhere like you're confident in the data and knowledgeable on the subject, and yet it's based on fucking phone interviews. What single, working mom do you think answers a random phone number and then is also willing to take an interview about the economy?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bquintb@midwest.social 42 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Groceries. Are. Still. High. Where is the confusion????

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 17 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Because grocery prices aren't high because the economy is doing poorly. We are being price gouged by grocery cartels.

You are being fooled into blaming Biden for what CEOs are doing to you.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Bidens only response is asking them to stop price gouging then doing nothing when they don't stop screwing Americans

why do people think nothing has been done?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 37 points 5 months ago

Rich people's money is thriving under Biden. So why don't Americans believe it?

Oh, we do, we just don't like what's happening for the rest of us.

[–] Ibaudia@lemmy.world 37 points 5 months ago

"Please, I can't afford food or housing"

Media outlets:

Economy doing great!!! Inflation down and stocks up!!!

"Okay, I guess I'll just fucking die then"

[–] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 36 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Depends on what you mean by "the economy".
Wall Street is striving, GDP is striving, but average people struggle to make rent.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Zak@lemmy.world 31 points 5 months ago

I looked over the metrics in the article and none of them approximate what percentage of Americans are struggling to pay their bills. That number probably closely approximates the percentage who think the economy isn't doing well. This is a different situation from people wrongly believing crime rates are high.

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 30 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

As long as private shareholders are having record quarterly earnings, almost all economists, hired by wealthy organizations largely to push the narrative that benefits those organizations, will of course declare victory.

Economists also generally defend our "free market" rigged crony capitalism as the only way too. They're literally the priesthood of this grift.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/rent-homelessness-harvard-report-center-for-housing-studies/

The homelessness epidemic is getting worse. Our people are dying in the streets in record numbers, please, go down to your nearest homeless tent city in every major population center in the US and tell them they're being dramatic.

This economy no longer cares about customers or employees. The Reagan/Kemp grift eviscerated the customers first, employees second, investors last model. Now it's private shareholders first and only demanding companies sabotage their long term future to goose their next quarter with layoffs, anticompetitive behaviors, and tax cheats. Why care about the products/services you literally exist to provide when you're part of an oligopoly, buying and killing any potential competitors trying to improve your economic sector's product/service? At that point, you can make shadows of what you used to make and your captive consumer base has nowhere else to go. Despite its primary selling point, market capitalism's end goal has been thoroughly proven: to END competition.

Capitalism is eating its own tail having conquered the monopoly board and having no more meaningful new markets left to metastasize in and exploit.

[–] slurpinderpin@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

There needs to be laws passed that change the structure of “fiduciaries”

Companies should exist for their employees first, customers second, and then shareholders, in that order. Pay the people creating the product/service as much as possible, put out the best possible product/service at the most competitive rate possible, and if there’s anything left over the shareholders get their cut.

Ironically, if corporations actually did this, they’d likely have plenty of success. It’s just mind boggling that the lazy fuckers pushing numbers around on a computer screen are the ones considered fiduciaries

[–] NateNate60@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

There is such a business structure. It's called a worker co-operative. They're pretty common in some areas (e.g. grocery) where they are able to compete with and even win against traditionally-owned grocery store chains. For example, one of the largest grocery co-operatives in the US, WinCo foods, competes with and actually beats the likes of Walmart and Kroger (called Fred Meyer here) in the price department. They do have some outside investment (IIRC), but the stores are mostly owned by the employees that work there.

I think we ought to encourage these types of businesses through extremely favourable tax treatment. I'm talking a 0% tax rate on dividends paid by co-operatives to workers. At the same time, it's understandable that most people start businesses for personal profit, which drives the creation of most businesses, so I think a hybrid system wherein the owner starts with a maximum of 50% equity in the company is fair, and the rest is owned by the workers. Imposing an expiration on the owner's shares (say, 50 years?) would mean that after the founders die, the entire company will be owned by the workers, while not extinguishing the motivation for people to establish businesses in the first place.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 26 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Only rich people and corporations are doing well.

EVERYONE ELSE is in a fucking recession...

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

A majority of Americans say that their own personal finances are doing well, and even when the question is expanded to their whole state, voters say the economy has improved.

Then from the source itself:

60% said their financial situation is good or excellent.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Read your own source, it is a year old, and 51% said the economy was getting worse. Only like 30% said it was good or excellent...

[–] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Damn, I didn't even realize OP's article was sourcing a 2023 poll. Well here are the updated numbers for 2024:

63% of Americans rate their current financial situation as being "good," including 19% of us who say it's "very good."

Exactly half (50%) say their personal financial situation is excellent or good

U.S. adults scored a 48.92 on our financial well-being scale

This source puts low income consumer confidence at 57.1%

68% of respondents saying the current quality of their financial life is what they expected or better

So overall the numbers haven't changed much since 2023 on how people see their own personal finances. Your point that, despite that, they still think the economy is getting worse just reiterates what the article is saying. For some people their finances are bad and they think things are getting worse. For some people their finances are good ant they think things are getting better. But strangely, for some people their finances are good but they still think things are getting worse. Or, to put it another way, some people think they're in good shape, but the economy is in bad shape, which is a pretty weird disconnect. And the number of people in that last category is not small.

[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 21 points 5 months ago (1 children)

How we measure the economy does not measure the financial stability of the masses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HuddaBudda@kbin.social 18 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I really don't like that the sources on this article are missing.

Sure, that’s a lot of money for the wealthy who control 93% of stock, but it’s also tens of millions of Americans who will have a more comfortable and secure retirement. In fact, the number of Americans who have over $1 million in their retirement accounts grew by 20% in the last quarter of 2023.

Fine and dandy, except that half of Americans don't have a retirement account. Or 47% of Americans.

So while retirement indexes are up, 1:2 people are not going to see that.

Inflation eased slightly in April — the first time this year that has happened. Overall inflation edged down to 3.4% and slipped to 3.6% when you exclude food and energy costs. (food expected to rise by an additional 2.2%)

Good to see the brakes are working. But just remember that not everyone goes out to by a car or house on a twice-a-week basis. But everyone does with the grocery store. Which in Biden's defense, he has started trying to pull back.

Though effort =/= job done.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Surely there are some numbers we could look at every day besides the stock market numbers. Like couldn't we have Real Income and/or Purchasing Power right next to the DOW and the S&P? Or how about instead of the Dow and S&P since, like you said - most Americans lives don't change by the changes in the stock market.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago

Why can’t we Manufacture Consent?

[–] bbuez@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

Instead of complaining about the obvious disconnect between metrics and real world, often regional CoL, etc etc (oh and cost of medical care). Here's a simple solution:

Raise federal minimum wage, it's been a good decade and a bit since it went up from $5/h, the dollar has only inflated oh about 45% since 2009

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Because everyone except the wealthy are struggling to pay their bills bootlicker

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 12 points 5 months ago

How many billions did Kroger make this quarter????

[–] BaldProphet@kbin.social 12 points 5 months ago

I'll believe it when I stop getting only rejection letters for entry level jobs.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The economy is doing good for what the president can do.

But the old metrics are not good. It used to just be employment rate that mattered, you know if people were employed that was sufficient. Now it's wages that have not kept up and it's a big issue.

[–] randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 5 months ago

No one can undo years of economic turbulence in three years. Everyone feels like they're being gaslit because they are. The patient will bleed out before you finish applying the first bandaid.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

I share their opinion but also wish more people would care about metrics other than gdp and stock market indexes when a Republican is in office.

The news babbles about the real economy and how we're on the brink of a recession tirelessly whenever a Democrat is in the presidency, then magically when a Republican is even just elected (not even in office yet) all of those "meaningless" numbers are suddenly meaningful, and it turns out there's actually nothing wrong with using unemployment numbers, the GDP, and the Dow Jones index to determine economic health, even as more go homeless.

The only well-known politician I've seen talk consistently about this regardless of the party in the white house is Bernie.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago (13 children)

They're asking the wrong question. The question should be who the economy is thriving for? The answer to that question will tell you everything you need to know.

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

s/the economy/rich people's money/i

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 7 points 5 months ago

The economy means rich peoples yaght money.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago

The economy isn't thriving under Biden - it's doing alright. The stock market is thriving but workers are being muscled out of purchasing power.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Because, as it has been for the last 40 years, it’s disproportionately going to the wealthy.

[–] hypnoton@discuss.online 4 points 5 months ago

"Stop trusting your lying eyes and trust my worthless spreadsheets instead."

load more comments
view more: next ›