-31
submitted 6 months ago by ylai@lemmy.ml to c/gaming@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 124 points 6 months ago

Almost certainly fake, but what a horrible thought.

[-] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 22 points 6 months ago

Microsoft wanted to buy Nintendo and Valve before. It was in the leaked documents. And I'm sure Microsoft makes suggestions all the time, we just don't hear about it usually. We mostly hear about deals that happen.

Besides that, I can't imagine that a competitor could buy a competitor. That would be illegal in most cuntries. Unlike Activision, which was not a competitor to Microsoft.

[-] AndrasKrigare@beehaw.org 2 points 6 months ago

Yeah, I think all indications have been that Microsoft is getting out of the video game business. Or, if they were planning on staying in, why would they close a bunch of studios, including successful ones like Hi-Fi Rush's Tango games.

[-] Saff@lemmy.ml 48 points 6 months ago

As long as valve say no then they can offer all they like. That is the advantage of not being a publicly traded company!

[-] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 46 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

according to unverifiable rumours. ... The leak comes from an unknown and unreliable source in the gaming industry.

But continues to write an entire article about it. I wouldn't be shocked if the rumor was set by the person who writes the article itself. Edit: Which itself is only a few paragraphs, but filled with ads, links and images on the entire page.

[-] Exec@pawb.social 7 points 6 months ago

Also wouldn't that pull in major antitrust violation cases especially in the EU?

[-] Reawake9179@lemmy.kde.social 1 points 6 months ago

I don't wanna jinx it, but there is no way that this deal would go through

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago

I'ts not about integrity, it's about clicks. It doesn't matter if you read the headline, only if you clicked.

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 30 points 6 months ago

That.... weirdly... seems like a lowball given the recent success of the steam deck

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Looking at the sales estimates, the numbers appear pretty modest compared to the other gaming devices. They’re probably under 5m units sold since early 2022.

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

EA is worth several times that and they don't have the #1 PC games platform or any hardware

Valve should at least be in the same ballpark

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Yeah, just saying that most of Valve’s value is probably in their software. Their hardware installed base is pretty small compared to others.

[-] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 26 points 6 months ago

Good Lord, no. Please no.

[-] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 24 points 6 months ago

Valve is way more valuable than Activision-Blizzard-King.

[-] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago

This is an AI generated article and has no basis in reality.

[-] Icalasari@fedia.io 7 points 6 months ago

Even if it was real, pretty sure Gaben would just laugh in their faces

[-] w00@feddit.de 3 points 6 months ago

Even if valve were to sell themselves, They would not sell to them.

[-] semperverus@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Doesn't his ex wife own half of his shares now though?

[-] deathmetal27@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Shares? Valve is a private company.

[-] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

Private companies can still have multiple owners

[-] semperverus@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Yes, shares. Employee Stock Ownership Plans are a thing, they're private shares in the company.

[-] xavier666@lemm.ee 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Microsoft: How about $16b?

Gaben: The best I can do is a couple thousand skins and crates

[-] Broken_Monitor@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Oh thank miscellaneous diety. For fucks sake everything Microsoft touches turns to shit, especially when it comes to game platforms.

[-] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 6 months ago

Considering Valve is one of the biggest backers of Linux that would be horrible (ofc it's ai generated nonsense).

[-] plinky@hexbear.net 9 points 6 months ago

that seems wildly cheap lol, to kill linux gaming alone is probably worth them 50 billion or more, ignoring money printing from steam store itself

[-] KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

The "source" otherwise does nothing but give away cosmetic in-game items if you subscribe and tag a friend on X.

[-] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

So they can burn it to the ground?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

$16B for Valve ? Clown offer 🤡

[-] QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Well... good thing I've been buying what I can through GOG... but this is terrible news, especially with the way Microsoft has been shutting down gaming studios recently.

Edit: meh, this just sounds like clickbait:

  • The leak comes from an unknown and unreliable source in the gaming industry.
  • Microsoft's acquisition of Activision Blizzard faced regulatory challenges, making the merger with Valve unlikely.
[-] restingboredface@sh.itjust.works 4 points 6 months ago

Plus they are bleeding money from all the acquisitions and haven't seen the return they expected in game pass subs. The cost cutting isn't done and it would be very surprising for them to try to dump more money into new storefronts when they are still trying to make their own business model profitable (to their expectations).

[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

It's an AI generated "article", on a site that exclusively feeds headlines into AI to write "articles".

So even if the original headline was - in the now-unknown wording - something rooted in reality, the generative shitcode has now turned both the headline and the content into utter derangement.

[-] Gnugit@aussie.zone 7 points 6 months ago

If this happens I'm inciting riots.

[-] xilophor@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

In 2022, Blizzard was valued at $60B and had a gross profit of $5.4B. Valve almost certainly had a gross profit more than that (Microsoft estimated $6.5B in 2021). $16B would be such a laughably low figure for the company, especially since Microsoft bought Blizzard at $70B (market cap of $74B around the same time). Not to mention how low-risk Valve's profit is.

[-] p5yk0t1km1r4ge@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

.....they can't even handle everything with Activision Blizzard. Jesus christ.

[-] Carighan@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Do you think Gabe would even raise an eyebrow for such a pocket money offer? Or would he actually find enough effort to laugh at it?

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

Gabe used to work for Microsoft, I can't imagine he's eager to repeat.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gabe_Newell

"He attended Harvard University in the early 1980s but dropped out to join Microsoft, where he helped create the first versions of the Windows operating system. He and another employee, Mike Harrington, left Microsoft in 1996 to found Valve, and funded the development of their first game, Half-Life (1998). Harrington left in 2000."

[-] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago
[-] warmaster@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Imagine a timeline where this happens.

What if there was an open source Steam clone, where everything is federated, and you could add repos like on KDE Discover, GNOME Software or F-DROID's Android client?

This would be awesome.

[-] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 months ago

It would be!

The big issue would be getting game developers onboard. The service valve provides is both to developers and to consumers.
The appeal to developers is that they can toss the game on steam and valve will manage putting it in front of players and getting them to buy it, and all the associated payment processing that entails.
Developers like steam because it has all the users and does a good job of "based on your games, buy these too".
Users like it because it has all the games, installation is inevitably trivial, and it does a good job offering them games they could plausibly like, often on sale, and there's a feeling of platform security: valve won't screw you over.

Any new distribution system will have a tough time breaking in. Just look at the difficulties epic has had despite giving away games constantly and offering extremely generous developer revenue shares.
Valve aimed to make steam $30-60 dollars more convenient than piracy, and that seems to extend to other forms of free as well.

First step is figuring out secure decentralized credit card payments. 😊

[-] warmaster@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Imagine plugging Flathub into this as a starting point. Also, if everything is federated, developers could sell directly. That's one way to get them onboard.

[-] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

Well, I don't think they're interested in selling directly. There's a lot of overhead in handling credit card payments and dealing with the jurisdictional issues of sales tax, currency conversion, and regional age and content restrictions.

Your notion sounds perfectly lovely from the consumer side, but from the creator side it's not much different from not using the system at all.

[-] warmaster@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Yes. But those would be able to chose whatever distributor fits them better. Humble, GOG, itchio, whatever... For the user it would all be the same.

[-] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

I could see a federated recommendation engine/ranking system/the social parts of game ownership, but I just don't see it panning out for the actual commerce part.
Those parts benefit from being able to control your own data and who it's shared with. I don't think there's a reasonable way to federate giving a specific individual money and them authorizing you to download or access a resource they control.

[-] ulkesh@beehaw.org 5 points 6 months ago

I was okay with them getting Blizzard because, well, how much worse could Blizzard actually get with the merger?

But this? I sincerely hope this never happens. Valve isn’t the complete shit-show that Blizzard has been. Valve actually understands its customers and seemingly, mostly, respects them. Please for all things good in this universe, keep it that way.

[-] Icalasari@fedia.io 2 points 6 months ago

As long as Gaben runs Valve, I can see him just laughing and saying no to whatever offer Microsoft gives

[-] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

On the plus side is HL3 will be released.

On the negative side is everything else about that situation and HL3 will be a rushed shit-show of a cash grab.

[-] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Please don't

[-] Katana314@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

I’m a little surprised it’s that low. I mean, considering their cloud and hardware divisions they’d be getting, shouldn’t Valve pay a bit more than $16m to buy Microsoft?

[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

They will buy it, then shut it down. Then people will finally buy games at the .... window games store?

this post was submitted on 22 May 2024
-31 points (33.7% liked)

Gaming

20021 readers
321 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS