217
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 93 points 1 month ago

Australians need to take this seriously—rules like this were a big factor in these killer machines becoming the norm in the US.

[-] vividspecter@lemm.ee 30 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

This is thankfully only about imports so it will limit the damage, but the coming fuel efficiency standards carve out an exception too (although I believe they are more stringent than the US standards at least).

EDIT: I was under the impression the tax only applies to private imports, but it actually doesn't. See my below comment. But it is limited to higher priced vehicles at least.

[-] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 20 points 1 month ago

The US also has this loophole, all SUVs are classified as ‘light trucks’ and therefore don’t have to follow the more strict emissions laws. This is what led to these massive cars and trucks.

Also, the roads in many US states are falling apart and larger vehicles and trucks drive better over potholes and bad road conditions.

People prefer big SUVs and trucks when the roads are badly maintained and it will damage normal cars. The trend of larger rims with a thinner sidewall almost guarantees normal cars will have much worse ride quality and be more prone to damage and costly repairs.

The new trucks are so tall and have a massive blind spot in front, you can't see anything. They are a danger to pedestrians and children in addition to having blinding headlights that shine directly at eye level for any normal car.

[-] AndyMFK@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago

Australia doesn't manufacturer cars any more. All cars in Australia are imported. Unless I'm misunderstanding your comment?

[-] vividspecter@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

~~The law refers to cars that aren't directly sold in Australia, i.e. through private imports. So if you buy from a dealer that has a presence in Australia, the import tax doesn't apply. And it only applies to cars above a certain price I should add, hence the name: Luxury Car Tax (LCT).~~

EDIT: Actually, I'm wrong on this. It applies to retailers and wholesalers too, see: https://www.ato.gov.au/businesses-and-organisations/gst-excise-and-indirect-taxes/luxury-car-tax/when-lct-applies

[-] BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world 48 points 1 month ago

I just don't get modern truck culture. They're so big, and ugly! They are such an inconvenience to everyone else on the road. And I doubt even half the people who own then do truck stuff with them. They're way to tall, the giant tall grilles look stupid. Their stupid headlights shine in my face. A 2024 Colorado is bigger than a 1994 Silverado. Why? I hate them even more than people who wear pajamas in public.

[-] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago

You can tell which ones aren't used for anything. Bed is spotless and unused, tires are clean, and the heaviest load it carries is its obese driver and his similarly obese family. We call them pavement princesses.

[-] Moneo@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Me feel small. Me worry about masculinity. Big truck make me feel big. Big truck make me feel good.

[-] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

And this is exactly why I have started referring to the massive pickup trucks as gender affirming care. It simultaneously makes fun of the “me need big truck because man” mentality, while also pissing off the types of guys who are most likely to buy the trucks. Because the guys who buy the trucks are the same guys protesting trans healthcare.

[-] BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Better slap a pair of rubber testicles on the hitch receiver so people know you're for sure a big, masculine man very secure in your manliness.

[-] Soggy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Inconveniencing everyone else is the point. That, and the belief that being in the biggest car makes you safer in a collision (by doing more damage to the other vehicle[s])

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net -1 points 1 month ago

What's wrong with jammies in public?

[-] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago

I hate these things. I'm driving around the suburbs of Melbourne in a 900kg hatchback carrying 3 kids and their schoolbags. I find myself constantly overtaking these things as it's the only means of seeing past them. I'm not even courteous about it anymore.

[-] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Mega Ute. New favorite word.

[-] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago
[-] Felix@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 month ago

Vehicles should be taxed by weight.

this post was submitted on 21 May 2024
217 points (97.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

8609 readers
219 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS