224

The schools & police trampling on student rights don't understand the true meaning of "trespassing" (www.lgbtqnation.com)

submitted 5 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

44 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 47 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 60 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

There is no form of effective protest of which is “acceptable”. Protests are meant to disrupt, to get as much attention as possible in order to spread a message and bring action, and those who oppose the protest will always object to that no matter what. That’s the point.

For protesters to act so socked that they’re getting arrested for protesting against the power elites at their schools while on private property seems pretty naive to me. They should have known that this would be the eventual outcome and to have been prepared for it. Not to say it should have stopped the protests from happening— just that, for protests to be effective, it has to piss off the right people, and you’ll likely get arrested, free speech be damned.

[-] WraithGear@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

If the point is to be disruptive, then loudly pointing out they are getting arrested for protesting is on brand and should be expected. The real question is why are you confused they continue to protest after being arrested?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -1 points 5 months ago

Maybe he thinks that arresting anyone who opposes genocide is the right thing to do.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee -2 points 5 months ago

I never said I was confused

[-] WraithGear@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

No but i did, and that was being charitable

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago

If you think insults are charity, it would appear that you’re the one who is confused.

[-] WraithGear@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

[removed by mod]

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Since you haven’t proven any of those accusation, this seems just another obvious insult and your inability to use the word “charity” correctly.

If you get this uncontrollably nasty just because an internet stranger said something that made you mad, perhaps it’s time to go outside for a break. Perhaps enjoy some nice herbal tea.

Best of luck with your emotional and vocabulary issues.

[-] WraithGear@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

You may complain to a moderator, but the statement still stands. Assuming you are confused, is very charitable assumption to make about your stance. Your going to have to point out the nasty part of my comment

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Perhaps you shouldn’t keep making assumptions. That doesn’t seem to be working out for you.

[-] WraithGear@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

I try to assume the best of people. And my assumption was that you were wrong because you didn’t know better, and that you were not a tool. You are right, it hasn’t been the best guess i could have made.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

I try to assume the best of people

All evidence to the contrary

And my assumption was that you were wrong

Your first mistake, but, unlike you, I don’t get all nasty when people make those. Also, you haven’t really proven that I was wrong, either.

You are right, it hasn’t been the best guess i could have made.

Nor was devolving into juvenile insults based off of hurt feelings.

Best of luck!

[-] WraithGear@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

[removed by mod]

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Calling another user AT BEST ignorant and at worst a useful moron definitely got your comment removed.

Arguing in bad faith and trolling gets this comment removed.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago

I’m not under any obligation to you, lol. YOU are, on the other hand, under an obligation to remain civil and obey the rules here.

And if imagining me being upset satisfies some sadistic urge for you, go ahead. I think it’s silly, but whatever.

Good luck on being a better person!

[-] meeeeetch@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

When you're paying 40k a year to attend their hedge fund with a sports team, there shouldn't be much of any place that's off limits to you.

And it seems rare that college kids get arrested en masse. So they're right to be at least a little surprised that this protest got cracked down on so hard.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I’m sure they’re normally allowed to be where they’re standing. If they’re asked to leave/disband, and they remain, it’s considered trespassing.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee -2 points 5 months ago

I think you forgot the /s

[-] anas@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

For protesters to act so socked that they’re getting arrested for protesting against the power elites at their schools while on private property seems pretty naive to me.

I’m really not sure what the appropriate reaction should be. Are they meant to celebrate getting arrested? It’s an expected outcome, but that doesn’t make it right.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago

don't be obtuse

It’s an expected outcome, but that doesn’t make it right.

i didn't say that

I’m really not sure what the appropriate reaction should be.

not to be surprised that it happened, for one. and, while universities do generally, have an atmosphere which support free expression, and many even have somewhat permissive protest policies, they're private property. now, i'm not defending the actions of the universities, but i'm saying that getting arrested for protesting on private property vs while protesting on public property are two different things-- and one isn't nearly as outrageous as the other.

part of civil disobedience is getting arrested.

[-] anas@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

To be honest I haven’t seen anyone act surprised because they’re getting arrested for protesting. Then again, I’m not American, and the only news I’m reading are here on lemmy (and reddit).

[-] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I think it's the fact that they are arrested and very rarely actually charged with a crime, which essentially amounts to state sanctioned kidnapping.

But otherwise I do agree with you.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

That’s one way to look at it. Another is that, rather than truly outrageously throwing the book at these protesters, the worst they got was a massive inconvenience.

Now, I’m not trying to downplay getting arrested - even brutally so. I have been arrested at protests by some nasty pigs who beat the shit out of me, and I have spend nights in jail as a result. I know how bad that shit sucks.

What I’m saying is that it’s what they signed up for. And if they want to protest police brutality, go do that, too, but don’t act all shocked that this happened.

Edit: in an ideal world, protesters would be treated with dignity and respect— but if we lived in an ideal world, there would be no need to protest.

[-] HasturInYellow@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Fair points. I just really hate the state monopoly on violence that they love to use almost exclusively on leftwing protests. If other such protesters were arrested as well, it would be less grating on my morals.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 0 points 5 months ago

Me too

[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 21 points 5 months ago

I also responded, “So, you are saying that property rights have priority over human rights?”

In this vein, I enter another definition of “trespassing” as “an unlawful act committed on the person, property, or rights of another.”

When university presidents and chancellors call in campus or municipal police officers to dismantle peaceful tent encampments and arrest demonstrators, they commit trespass against “the person” and their First Amendment right to “freedom of speech, the press, assembly, and the right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

Not quite at the Sovereign Citizen level of legal misunderstand but getting there...

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 19 points 5 months ago

Trespassing outside of people’s immediate dwelling spaces shouldn’t be illegal at all. It’s just a tool for the wealthy to control the rest of us and where we can exist on our common planet.

[-] Cornpop@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Fuck Israel and all but this is such a stupid take on property rights.

[-] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 5 points 5 months ago

This reads like something a Sovereign citizen would write.

The first amendment allows you to say whatever you want without threat of arrest, but it doesn't give carte blanche to do whatever you want whilst saying it.

If you're on private property after closing time to the public, then you're trespassing, regardless of why you're there.

The threat of arrest is something you have to accept if you're going to protest in a disruptive way - the ones you're protesting against will do anything they legally can to get you to stop.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Minor point… at any time a property owner or an agent thereof can ask you to leave and your trespassing at that point.

As far as civil liberties, the reasons can’t be that you’re a protected class. But that’s about it. Generally, it’s really hard to prove that the rules are being unfairly applied to begin with, and then there are a lot of ways around that. it’s really hard to prove racism for some of those ways (“suspicious”=hoodie, for example.)

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 5 points 5 months ago

What university campus has a closing time?

this post was submitted on 19 May 2024

224 points (94.8% liked)

politics

19170 readers

4560 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News