412

Those Silicon Valley geniuses have done it again!

Next week- "it's like the subway, but with AI!"

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 115 points 6 months ago

This is what happens when you believe the private sector is the answer to everything. We reinvent the wheel one hundred times, and each time its more square than before.

[-] helios@social.ggbox.fr 36 points 6 months ago

Yet somehow more expensive.

[-] Meron35@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

Which makes it better than a bus because then I don't have to sit next to poor people /s

[-] iknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 6 months ago

I have a friend who unironically believes in expensive services for this reason.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] tonyn@lemmy.ml 94 points 6 months ago

Just waiting for them to reinvent light rail

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 80 points 6 months ago

How about Uber Feet, where you pay to walk somewhere?

[-] tonyn@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 months ago

Yeah, my nearest grocery store is a 1h15m walk or an 8 minute drive.

[-] variants@possumpat.io 35 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
[-] thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 months ago

Which costs extra, of course

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 8 points 6 months ago

Uber Feet XL

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 months ago

Uber Rickshaw

Because only poors should walk

[-] meeeeetch@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

They invented FSD in the sixties and it makes a handy little loop through downtown Detroit.

[-] skyspydude1@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

And now we're inventing the shittiest "rail line" between Ann Arbor and Detroit on 94. All the hassle and expense of rail travel, with none of the efficiency!

[-] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Never heard of Hyperloop eh?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Plume@lemmy.blahaj.zone 82 points 6 months ago

NOW INTRODUCING: Public transports! But private! And dIsRuPTiVe!

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 6 months ago

When public transportation was first introduced in most places, it was run by private companies for profit. This changed mostly because it wasn't profitable to compete with cars when those became popular.

Of course there still are private companies running public transport: long distance buses and trains in many places, and commercial aviation is really also a form of public transportation.

So there is nothing novel about buses being run by private companies for profit.

[-] vegetal@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

For me it's the marketing that makes me roll my eyes. Shuttle instead of bus when in the United States. (Curiously, in other countries it's called bus by Uber.)

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 10 points 6 months ago

The only time I hear shuttle used is for a thing that transports between two locations specifically. A "shuttle" from the airport to a hotel or whatever, for example. This seems to match the definition of shuttle also, so I think it's correct. It has nothing to do with marketing, rather actually using the proper term.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 24 points 6 months ago

silicon valley invented the marshrutka

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ribhu@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

Wait they didn't have them in the US? We've had uber shuttles for years in India

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] blazera@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Good? We need more bus routes

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 50 points 6 months ago

We don't need to make them Uber chartered bus routes.

load more comments (42 replies)
[-] akilou@sh.itjust.works 45 points 6 months ago

We need more public transportation, not privatized bus routes

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] deathbird@mander.xyz 6 points 6 months ago

It's not a brilliant new idea, it's a good old one. Jitneys are back baby!

[-] Allero@lemmy.today 4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I think the point is, unlike buses with fixed routes, such shuttles could deliver people to places that face temporary massive traffic - like concert venues or whatnot.

There is no need to constantly run huge amounts of buses there, but at some point of time there's a lot of people willing to go - and such shuttles, flexible in their routes, may be the solution.

[-] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

Because nobody in any public transit board has ever implemented such a thing?

In North Carolina, park and ride busses for the state fair have long been a thing, among a litany of several other examples.

[-] erwan@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 months ago

Just because it's not a completely new concept doesn't mean it's stupid.

It can bring value even if it's a small iterative innovation over existing buses.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Omgboom@lemmy.zip 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

There's a bus stop at our local sports arena, and they do a dynamic scheduling thing for events, so no it's exactly like our bus system

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
412 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

59385 readers
1166 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS