48
submitted 1 week ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/globalnews@lemmy.zip

Released amid record-breaking temperatures and rising seas, the survey reports an alarming decline in perceived urgency.

Archived version: https://archive.ph/WzxgU

all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago

They know its urgent, they are just sick of being ignored

[-] alternative_factor@kbin.social 6 points 1 week ago

Couldn't say it better myself. People here say that people have no stomach for revolution, but they'll have plenty of stomach for it when they haven't eaten two meals during the inevitable famines.

[-] stembolts@programming.dev 33 points 1 week ago

What am I supposed to do? Live in a perpetual anxiety attack? Instead I choose to accept I'm one of the last living humans before the atmosphere turns to acid, or skittles, or whatever the fuck.

But hey, line go up.

[-] AnEilifintChorcra@sopuli.xyz 29 points 1 week ago

Tbh I'm just so tired of it, my whole life I've been warned about this constantly, non stop, and nobody with any power does anything effective ever.

I do all my little environmentally friendly things and they're all just routine now. I rarely even bother to read about it anymore because its so depressing and I've been told lie after lie after lie that this policy will help and that regulation will be great and and these new laws will counteract it and then... Nothing, just right back to destroying this pale blue dot

[-] AmbroisindeMontaigu@kbin.social 23 points 1 week ago

What's the youth supposed to do? They've been mocked and cursed and attacked and arrested for participating in climate action, and the people in charge are continuing on their slow and unsteady curse. We've had many decades of warnings with increasing urgency and nobody cared enough, what's the point of focusing on the youth when they're the least responsible for the state of the world?

[-] stonerboner@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 1 week ago

There’s a huge difference in how people process/accept/protest when the conversation changes from “if we keep doing what we’re doing, we’ll kill the earth” to “the earth is already fucked, best of luck.”

There’s a certain point where optimism degrades into hopelessness.

[-] YungOnions@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

To be clear, this poll is only about American youth. I've not seen anything about the same reduction in urgency in youths from elsewhere in the world.

It's also worth noting that the poll didn't have a particularly large number of participants and that the age range was 18+ which obviously excludes a fair number of American youths younger than 18.

The Monmouth University Poll was conducted by telephone from April 18 to 22, 2024 with 808 adults in the United States.

I'm also just going to leave this here as a counterpoint:

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2023/09/unprecedented-youth-climate-trial-demands-action-from-32-european-governments/

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

I mean, we keep hearing breathlessly alarmed articles about how "this year is a tipping point!" and "if we don't do X by next year it's all over!" And then those dates pass, and either new dates are announced or they're just forgotten about.

Crying wolf means that when the actual wolf comes nobody pays attention any more.

[-] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 week ago

We are beyond the tipping point. Just look at this year. We have floods that are dumping in days what used to take months, and we have droughts never seen in the modern age.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 3 points 1 week ago

Well, there you go. How can you expect people to pay attention when you're telling them there's nothing they can do?

[-] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago

That's not what I'm saying. We are past the point of being able to reverse the harm already done, but we can still limit the future harm. And that is critical. The current world is still livable, alternative is portions of the world becomes unlivable.

And who knows, maybe some future tech will make possible what is impossible today.

[-] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Something needs to be done about the greedy oil industry lobbyists who have far too much influence over... well... everything.

For example my spouse and I wanted to replace our oil heater with an electric heat pump + solar panels for our small house. The problem is the electric heat pump/installation is prohibitively expensive. It's far cheaper and more convenient to get a new oil or gas furnace.

We hope to save and get one anyway, but it won't happen for a long time even if we have zero emergencies.

The oil companies are lobbying against subsidies/incentives for new tech like this because it cuts into their profits. It's frustrating that the average person can't make meaningful change because we can't afford to. All thanks to the market being controlled by the oil companies.

Sorry for the rant. This is just one little piece of the big picture that I've personally run into and it royally pisses me off. Like you said new tech is vital to future harm reduction, but accessibility to currently available green tech is important too and the financial barriers to it is something we should focus on as well.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io -2 points 1 week ago

That's not a "tipping point", then. Being past a tipping point means that future harm is unavoidable.

[-] cobra89@beehaw.org 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Future harm is unavoidable. There is worse future harm avoidable. It's really not that hard of a concept.

Shit is already gonna be bad, but we can prevent it from becoming really bad.

[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's the difference between what they can do and what they're willing to do. Future generations will think us fools.

this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
48 points (94.4% liked)

Interesting Global News

2086 readers
940 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS