If this is true, then we should prepare to be shout at by chatgpt why we didnt knew already that simple error.

I got an email ban.

1609 hours logged 431 solved threads

Take all you want, it will only take a few hallucinations before no one trusts LLMs to write code or give advice

See, this is why we can't have nice things. Money fucks it up, every time. Fuck money, it's a shitty backwards idea. We can do better than this.

So they pulled a "reddit"?

Reddit/Stack/AI are the latest examples of an economic system where a few people monetize and get wealthy using the output of the very many.

First, they sent the missionaries. They built communities, facilities for the common good, and spoke of collaboration and mutual prosperity. They got so many of us to buy into their belief system as a result.

Then, they sent the conquistadors. They took what we had built under their guidance, and claimed we "weren't using it" and it was rightfully theirs to begin with.

Oh I didn't consider deleting my answers. Thanks for the good idea ~~Barbra~~ StackOverflow.

Letting corporations "disrupt" forums was a mistake.

Maybe we should replace Stack Overflow with another site where experts can exchange information? We can call it "Experts Exchange".

At the end of the day, this is just yet another example of how capitalism is an extractive system. Unprotected resources are used not for the benefit of all but to increase and entrench the imbalance of assets. This is why they are so keen on DRM and copyright and why they destroy the environment and social cohesion. The thing is, people want to help each other; not for profit but because we have a natural and healthy imperative to do the most good.

There is a difference between giving someone a present and then them giving it to another person, and giving someone a present and then them selling it. One is kind and helpful and the other is disgusting and produces inequality.

If you're gonna use something for free then make the product of it free too.

An idea for the fediverse and beyond: maybe we should be setting up instances with copyleft licences for all content posted to them. I actually don't mind if you wanna use my comments to make an LLM. It could be useful. But give me (and all the other people who contributed to it) the LLM for free, like we gave it to you. And let us use it for our benefit, not just yours.

Begun, the AI wars have.

Faces on T-shirts, you must print print. Fake facts into old forum comments, you must edit. Poison the data well, you must.

Messages that people post on Stack Exchange sites are literally licensed CC-BY-SA, the whole point of which is to enable them to be shared and used by anyone for any purpose. One of the purposes of such a license is to make sure knowledge is preserved by allowing everyone to make and share copies.

You really don't need anything near as complex as AI...a simple script could be configured to automatically close the issue as solved with a link to a randomly-selected unrelated issue.

The enshittification is very real and is spreading constantly. Companies will leech more from their employees and users until things start to break down. Acceleration is the only way.

primary use for AI is self destructing your website.

I despise this use of mod power in response to a protest. It's our content to be sabotaged if we want - if Stack Overlords disagree then to hell with them.

I'll add Stack Overflow to my personal ban list, just below Reddit.

And the enshittification continues...

Eventually, we will need a fediverse version of StackOverflow, Quora, etc.

I fully understand why they are doing this, but we are just losing a mass of really useful knowledge. What a shame...

Data should be socialized and machine learning algorithms should be nationalized for public use.

Why does OpenAI want 10 year old answers about using jQuery whenever anyone posts a JavaScript question, followed by aggressive policing of what is and isn't acceptable to re-ask as technology moves on?

I'm going to run out of sites at this pace.

While at the same time they forbid AI generated answers on their website, oh the turntables.

Rather than delete, modify the question so its wrong. Then the ai will hallucinate.

Reddit did almost the same and don't forget guys to delete your Reddit account

A malicious response by users would be to employ an LLM instructed to write plausibly sounding but very wrong answers to historical and current questions, then an army of users upvoting the known wrong answer while downvoting accurate ones. This would poison the data I would think.

Maybe we need a technical questions and answers siteon the fediverse!