theyβve created a drive powered by a βNew Forceβ outside our current known laws of physics, giving the propellant-less drive enough boost to overcome gravity.
Right......
this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
39 points (68.6% liked)
[Dormant] moved to !space@mander.xyz
11397 readers
1 users here now
This community is dormant, please find us at !space@mander.xyz
You can find the original sidebar contents below:
Rules
- Be respectful and inclusive.
- No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
- Engage in constructive discussions.
- Share relevant content.
- Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
- Use appropriate language and tone.
- Report violations.
- Foster a continuous learning environment.
Picture of the Day
The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula
Related Communities
π Science
- !astronomy@mander.xyz
- !curiosityrover@lemmy.world
- !earthscience@mander.xyz
- !esa@feddit.nl
- !nasa@lemmy.world
- !perseverancerover@lemmy.world
- !physics@mander.xyz
- !space@beehaw.org
- !space@lemmy.world
π Engineering
π Art and Photography
Other Cool Links
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
It's true. Here's a copy of their research paper:
Sure, here's what your research paper could look like:
Title: Unveiling a Novel Force: Propelling Beyond Gravitational Constraints
Abstract: This paper investigates a newly hypothesized force that enables propellant-less drives to defy gravity. Examining experimental anomalies and theoretical speculations, it explores potential mechanisms and applications, signaling a transformative leap in space exploration and transportation technology.
But as an AI model, I don't know shit and come up with bullshit out of my synthetic ass.
Man, I wish that disclaimer had to be attached to anything generated by ai!
synthetic ass π€€
New Force isnt as good bring back "Force Classic" π€
Ikr? It already comes in four different flavours! (Five if you count the Star Wars Edition, but that was just a marketing gimmick.)
Obviously Buhlerβs claims are pretty βwoah, if true,β but the history of propellant-less drives is filled with seemingly positive results that are eventually dashed upon the rocks of scientific reality.
"Big if true"
Me too but only for a short time.
[jumps]
The secret is to throw yourself at the ground and miss.
I do wonder why we never ask why they are former NASA / Blue Origin / SpaceX whatever. Did they try to bring up some crazy idea and let go? Did they just lose it?
Im always hopeful for new breakthroughs but always sceptical
People leave companies for all sorts of reasons. There's politics at every job.
It'd sure be nice if some break through like this was realized. But when you have a company to greatly benefit from this "impossible discovery", hard to stay optimistic it isn't some grift.
The EM Drive Mk II
TimeCube or GTFO
After reading the article, and doing a little digging on this I can confidently say this article is utter garbage. You can look up the patent application on this, it's something to do with electrostatic forces which is a well known area of physics. Nothing magical about it.
For anyone curious, someone was kind enough to post the summary of the patent in this thread https://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=60131.0
Very interesting, and a very very terrible web page.
Disappearances come after the patents get filed.
Engineer found dead in probable suicide.
Why would anyone want to kill him if this were true? It would be a dream for NASA and everybody else working in space flight.
FWIW I'd bet almost anything this will be as useful as the EmDrive.
If someone already quietly had similar tech maneuvering their satellites, and wanted to remain the only actor with eyes in the sky that can't be shot down or eventually chased down due to lack of fuel.