336
all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 37 points 3 months ago

took me to long to realize they were talking about franchise rebooting

and not ReBoot the groundbreaking computer animated series from 1994

[-] Krackalot@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 3 months ago

When they eventually reboot ReBoot, do you think they'll stick with ReBoot, use ReBooted or go with ReReBoot?

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Probably call it Reboot, but add a : and put a bunch of stupid words afterwards, and make it a horrible live action hybrid thing thats incomprehensibly stupid.

[-] GuerillaGorillas@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

I don’t know if you’re referring to this or don’t know but that’s pretty much exactly what they did a few years ago: https://m.imdb.com/title/tt6849940/

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

The snark kinda writes itself at this point yknow

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I had no idea that thing i was specificly and explicitly referencing existed 💩

[-] GraniteM@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

The made a sort-of sequel called ReBoot: The Guardian Code, and from what heard it was terrible, so I exercised my limitless not-watching-that potential.

[-] modifier@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 months ago

I don't know, but I intend to find out.

[-] noseatbelt@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

Alphanumeric!

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago
[-] Stern@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

When I first heard that I was like... why? The "live" action Lion King got dogshit reviews and continuoisly clowned on.

Then I found out it made 1.5 billion on a ~250 million budget and understood.

Fuck the mouse tho

[-] NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

One important note about the mouse shitting out live action remakes, they want to hold the copyright for as long as possible.

They don't care if Aladdin with Will Smith only makes a 10% return (Hollywood accounting), because they've renewed their claim on the IP and merchandising the blue corpse of Robin Williams Genie far exceeds any film profits. They make more than $5 billion per year just on licensing fees.

[-] ninja@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

That's not how that works. 1. Aladdin isn't an original Disney story. Like Cinderella, it's an old story and anyone can make a version of it. 2. The timer on the animated film can't be reset. It's running and will continue to run. Steamboat Willie is the prime example of this. That version of Mickey is now in public domain, but later versions are not.

[-] NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Winnie the Pooh isn't an original Disney IP either. Yet if you put Pooh in a recognizably Disney style Pooh costume they'll sue you. You can sell merch of shirtless Pooh all you like.

It's still protecting the Disney version of the IP. It's why the live action remakes still share a visual language with the animated originals.

You can make an Aladdin movie if you like. But god help you if there is a Blue Genie with characteristics recognizable to an objective observer as being similar to Genie®.

Steamboat Willie is public domain, but Mickey Mouse® is not.

That doesn't mean Steamboat Willie is fair game either, Disney can still argue it's a trademark, and likely will, since they've made it the new intro clip to every Disney IP.

Here's an writeup covering it in more depth, from The Carey School of Business at Johns Hopkins:

https://carey.jhu.edu/articles/mickey-public-domain-copyright-holders

[-] ninja@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Yes

Still no, because the timer started with the first release of the first product.

Yes, but now there are 2 versions of Genie with two different copywrite timelines. Both are still currently protected. (I will admit I haven't looked up if Genie is a registered trademark; still talking about copywrite here.)

Yes, but the Steamboat Willie Mickey Mouse character isn't the same as the registered trademark of Mickey Mouse.....but

Yes, Disney is totally working on that

Yes, this article supports this.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

They make more than $5 billion per year just on licensing fees.

Disney is the single largest grossing ip licenser, at $61.7B in 2023.. This, from a company that grossed $89B total.

Nothing they sell is original anymore. Its all regurgitated slop.

[-] RealFunAtParties@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

I feel like this is more true the better a given thing is. The better the original, the slimmer the chance there is that the remake will top it.

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago

Yeah....lets get reboots of flops that had promise like League of Extraordinary Gentlemen

[-] djsoren19@yiffit.net 5 points 3 months ago

This is the thing that kills me most, especially when it comes to video game remakes. I don't want to go back and replay a good game from my childhood with slightly better graphics. I want to go back to a game that I loved, which had a ton of flaws and weird issues, and see it get the final release it deserves. So far the closest we've come to that has been Dragon's Dogma 2, but I'd kill for something like an Arcanum remake, or the original Vampire: The Masquerade game, or Timesplitters.

I think the issue is that suits see art as a product to sell and get rid of, whereas creatives see a process that could use 2-3 more iterations. In our minds, it makes more sense to go back, give it a few more iterations, but suits just call it a profit failure and move on.

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Keep the same production design though. That was fucking fantastic.

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Fuck the car was beautiful.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

Look at Batman. 85 years of reboots and there's still life in the old boy yet.

I didn't think they could top Batman-The Animated Series, and then Nolan and Heath Ledger [RIP] prove me wrong.

[-] OpenHammer6677@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Agreed. The latest Batman movie with Pattinson is pretty good tho

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

How do I learn this mystical skill?

[-] stembolts@programming.dev 7 points 3 months ago

You gotta watch this animated show called One Piece, once you've seen all of the episodes the ancestors will imbue you with the knowledge.

[-] djsoren19@yiffit.net 4 points 3 months ago

Which one? The original, the live-action remake? or the anime remake planned for later?

[-] stembolts@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

I was just joking cuz it has infinite episodes.

[-] the_post_of_tom_joad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

You actually have to watch the live adaptation of the anime one piece if you haven't. I went in expecting to hate it.. looked forward to hating it. It was good

[-] stembolts@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

Yea my friend said the same, it's on my to-watch list.

[-] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Instructions unclear. Watching the live action version.

[-] stembolts@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

Rest in Pieces, Shamalamadingdong Tsung claims another soul.

[-] plumbercraic@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 3 months ago

Find something you love then watch a sequel/reboot/adaptation written by a different team with contempt for the source material. For me it started with ghost busters 2016, but tlou part 2 and the witcher Netflix really helped too.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The weird thing about the live action Last Airbender is that it felt like an abridged cartoon Airbender. If you hadn't watched the original, so much would just fly straight over your head.

Like, at that point, why even do the original story? Just make an actual sequel / spin-off / whatever. There's tons of additional Avatar material in comic books they've been putting out since... what? 2011?

Same thing with Star Wars. LucasArts and Disney churned out crap for so long. The stubborn refusal to license the Timmothy Zhan novels and make them into a show/movie is baffling.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

New = risky, gross

Old = bankable, yey

[-] stembolts@programming.dev 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
[-] Skua@kbin.social 9 points 3 months ago

I'm a bit confused about what it's for. Are they intending on expanding anything from the original series? If not, what does it offer over the original?

To be clear here I'm not saying it's bad. I have no idea. I haven't watched it and don't care all that much for the original either (which, to clarify again, does not mean I think the original is bad, it was just never special to me personally). I just don't understand the intention.

[-] Baggie@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 months ago

The cynic in me says money.

More specifically though, there's this sense of media hierarchy where some mediums are considered superior/more digestible/mainstream than others. Think back to the 2000s, everyone wanted that live action cowboy bebop remake with Keanu reeves, same kind of thing.

I couldn't tell you why this exists, very often the original media was good because of the medium it was presented in. I'd argue avatar is one of those cases, but that's me.

[-] stembolts@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Boop beep I got delete. .

[-] blargerer@kbin.social 6 points 3 months ago

I'm happy you liked it, but its really quite bad. It ruins character arcs, has bad acting and terrible dialogue, and it apparently never heard of the show don't tell rule.

[-] stembolts@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Well we can hope they take some of these lessons to heart in the upcoming seasons.

I love the source material so much that it seems like I may be taste-blind to the flaws. I'm pretty thankful for that.

[-] criitz@reddthat.com 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

That's a hot take. I couldn't make it through the trailer when they mispronounced the main character's name. How could they have respected any of the rest of the material? I'll still pass on watching it.

EDIT: OH this is about the live action TV Series not the Movie! ...Still pass

[-] stembolts@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Boop beep I got delete.

[-] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I don't think I liked it as much as you, but I definitely enjoyed it. It was fun.

this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
336 points (97.2% liked)

tumblr

3036 readers
162 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS