18
Easy answer: it's going to depend on the individual. There are currently 30 people being held in the Guantanamo Bay black site, all but one of whom are currently either indefinitely awaiting sentencing or are in indefinite detention but have not yet even been charged with a crime. They were all detained between 2002 and 2008.
i'm not familiar with Cuban law but i have a hard time believing they could accommodate tortured & irregularly detained individuals without that ruining the case, which is also the case with US law they just endlessly loophole/delay it to save face
You're 100% correct. We assess the crimes they've been accused of (if any) and pass judgment based on the facts. Most of them will go free. After being in a secret prison for two decades, they are going to need comprehensive financial, social, and medical support—as decent people we'd be obligated to provide it. It's less of an ethical dilemma, and more a test of basic ethics.
waterboarding in guantanamo bay sounds like a whole lot of fun if you dont know what either of these things are
Cuba has always been against terrorism against normal Americans. They had spies infiltrate anti-communist terrorist organizations in the US, and they succeeded for a good while, and this was after the USSR collapsed. Even when they had the support of a nuclear power they didn't want to harm regular people, so bin Laden wouldn't be of much use as an asset, maybe with the exception of getting technical advice for weapons and bombs, etc.
Osama likely wouldn't have much of a beef with Cubans and vice versa. Castro was pro-israel, but being saying your support Israel is not the same as giving weapons to kill Palestinians and start wars with neighboring Arab countries. So because of those two things, plus Cuba never having any bloody, ancient historical interactions with the Arab world, should they release Osama and co., they can probably trust that Cubans will be safe from Islamic terrorism since there is no tactical or symbolic purpose. But, the optics of releasing the most wanted man is not great, so they will likely transfer Osama to a different country to be imprisoned. Cuba will likely be the target of terrorism up until Osama is transferred, then resources will be spent on attacking whichever country Osama is transferred to.
Would someone being dangerous make them less valuable as an asset for Cuba?
Back in the day Americans would commit crimes then hijack planes to Cuba, or just hijack planes in order to get a safe passage to Cuba. I don't remember whether it's true, but I remember reading that Castro was really annoyed with these people and would send them back. The American authorities would then offer (perhaps facetiously?) to buy people tickets to Cuba so they don't have to hijack planes, and Castro objected to this because he didn't want a bunch of Yankee criminals inside the country.
I hate you
they'd release them, E Z PZ. it'd be completely unteneable for Cuba to continue with the detention or persecution. any country wants to start their own case could probably grab them pretty easily afterwards
Is it in Cuba’s best interest to release Bin Laden when he is an anti communist? Any country that wants him is either a us ally and can’t have them, or would not prosecute Bin Laden and he would surely do another terrorism. The only question is, do you think he’s not going to harm Cuba or it’s allies?
The only question is, do you think he’s not going to harm Cuba or it’s allies?
No. that's why this is pretty easy for Cuba, the people released have very little interest in the Caribbean, and have no capability to hurt Cuba even if they decided to after Cuba ended their incarceration. Cuba defends itself directly from the United States, al-Qaeda is little leagues shit
If i had nuclear weapons and means of delivery. I would release him. If i had infinite money on top of that ill give him a billion dollars. Ill point it out to him that i have no ambitions in the muslim world or any means to opose his agenda. The biggest concern is the us. Once they are gone i can worry about other things. The us finances terrorism why shouldnt i?
Maybe I'm not understanding what the ethical dilemma is, just brain wash them to think imperialism is bad and train them to be anti US terrorists?
They already think the us is bad, they’re in Guantanamo, do you trust them to just attack the us?
this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2024
18 points (100.0% liked)
chapotraphouse
13511 readers
1157 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank
Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here
Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS