288
submitted 6 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Neato@ttrpg.network 91 points 6 months ago

Cutting Social Security is also known as killing retirees.

[-] this_1_is_mine@lemmy.world 39 points 6 months ago

Take that boomers.... /s

In bird culture. This is seen as a dick move.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

They staggered the reduction last time. This time it would really hurt Gen X forward.

[-] blarth@thelemmy.club 7 points 6 months ago
[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Agreed. Vote blue.

[-] this_1_is_mine@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Maybe .... And Maybe they will pull a Spanish Inquisition.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 9 points 6 months ago

I wouldn't expect them to do that, no.

[-] Ilovemyirishtemper@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I won't lie; I upvoted (or whatever the lemmy version is) because I'm a sucker for any R&M reference.

[-] guacupado@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

If they aren't making Republicans richer, the redcoats don't care.

[-] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 6 months ago

A neighbor of mine relies on social security and said he only gets $3000/year. He's a cancer survivor in poor health with crippling bipolar disorder and lives in a care home. The home provides food and shelter but not clothing or recreation, so the locals always help him out. He's only in his 60s. How is anyone supposed to survive like that? If they cut his pay any further he straight up won't be able to live.

[-] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

Well you see, at this point since he is no longer able to be exploited for capital, he is no longer useful to the ruling class, and must be discarded. He is a burden to the system an no longer has value. - right wing politics.

[-] 108@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

My Mom will lose her home as well.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

If that’s $3k/yr after paying a care home, that’s not so bad.

Social security is based on what you pay in: your top 35 years. If he truly only gets $3k/year, did he even work? Yes, you could argue there should be something need based

[-] Everythingispenguins@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Sorry what?? $250 a month is not enough even when you don't have to pay for housing or food. He would still have to pay if he wanted a cell phone. What about this copay on meds? I doubt there he has that coved 100%. According to the AARP "...1 in 5 adults of Medicare age, out-of-pocket health care costs in 2021 exceeded $2,000..." Or say he wants to go anywhere. It is likely he can't drive, and if he could he couldn't afford to keep a car, so that is rideshare or taxis for anywhere the senior van doesn't go. Assuming there even is one.

But no he is most likely getting more than 3K but it is eaten up by the care home. Medicare is terrible at covering any type of assisted living. It covers full on hospital stays but the light care that keeps people out of the hospital not so much.

https://www.aarp.org/health/medicare-qa-tool/does-medicare-cover-all-health-care-costs.html

https://www.aarp.org/health/medicare-qa-tool/does-medicare-cover-assisted-living.html

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Lol you think they'll stop paying? If they cut the payroll tax it'll just get paid with debt....just like it is right now.

We need to get ss needs based.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] buzz86us@lemmy.world 56 points 6 months ago

How about we cut subsidies on oil, and corn, heavily tax carbon output, and put heavy tariffs on virgin plastics.. Doing that would increase life expectancy, AND improve quality of life.

[-] pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online 14 points 6 months ago

That's the opposite of what his side wants. It really seems like they're actively trying to force the apocalypse.

[-] IamtheMorgz@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago

For some of them, they are. There's a whole thing in the Bible about how bad the world has to get (including a war in Israel) for the second coming to happen, and they're trying to force it.

A ton of evangelicals believe they are living in the end times and there's no reason to care about the future of the planet or nation anyway.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Quite the amount of hubris. "God has a plan, but he hasn't worked hard enough at it, so I'm going to help him out."

[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

It's genocidal. All the nonbelievers will go to hell and the believers will be raised from the dead.

Christians suck.

[-] pelicans_plight@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

There's an actual word for what they are doing to us, I never see anyone use it, so I thought people should know it exists.

The following definition was copied from Wiktionary.

omnicide

noun

The total extinction of the human species as a result of human action. Most commonly it refers to human extinction through nuclear warfare, but it can also refer to such extinction through other means such as global anthropogenic ecological catastrophe and Lethargica.

Isn't peace in the middle east one of the signs of the biblical apocalypse, though?

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 45 points 6 months ago

If they’re not planning to pay it back, why am I required to pay into it?

[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Do you forego all insurance or just some?

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Social Security is a compulsory federal retirement plan.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
288 points (97.4% liked)

News

23305 readers
3821 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS