461
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 140 points 5 months ago

I really can't think of a quippy response to this. The cruelty is flabbergasting. They're actively campaigning for future generations to be worse off than they are.

[-] WaxiestSteam69@lemmy.world 52 points 5 months ago

I can't get over the quote from the bills author when he says "Give me a break". In my district in the last election there were 3 candidates running for the state Legislature and they all tried to out conservative eqch other.

[-] lost_tortie@lemmy.world 75 points 5 months ago

First-term state Rep. Roger Wilder, R-Denham Springs, who sponsors the child labor measure and owns Smoothie King franchises across the Deep South, said people have been too critical of his bill. “The wording is ‘we’re here to harm children.’ Give me a break," he says. "These are young adults.”

This is the quote and it's appalling.

[-] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 65 points 5 months ago

owns Smoothie King franchises across the Deep South

Ahhhh, so he's just looking for fast food slaves. Got it.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

Well, . . . yeah. These legislative gems don’t come from ideals or deeply held beliefs. Just continued smash ‘n grab.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Cosmos7349@lemmy.world 25 points 5 months ago

Oh got it so ya we're saying this all wrong then, ya? It should be "we're here to harm young adults", right?

[-] lost_tortie@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

"There are no children [to abuse], only young adults ;-)"

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

As if that makes it better. "Oh it's not children who are suffering but young adults who are suffering! Phew! Never mind, then!"

[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 5 points 5 months ago

People are LYING! We're NOT trying to harm Children! We're trying to harm Young Adults!

-That guy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] modifier@lemmy.ca 10 points 5 months ago

Give me a break

What an amazing choice of words

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

They're actively campaigning for future generations to be worse off than they are.

Just the ones who weren't born into massive inherited wealth gathered by systemic exploitation. Ie none of their friends or family be affected.

[-] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 110 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Gotta love how these old fucks are pulling the ladder from behind and making decisions for us when they won't even be alive to see its effects on society. Fucking hell at some point something has got to fucking give.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 46 points 5 months ago

How are people okay with this?

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 36 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

People don't have to be okay with it. Just the 20% of the population who votes for these assholes. Our system of government makes sure a minority can rule as long as their population density is sufficiently low.

[-] WaxiestSteam69@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

I don't know if you're from Louisiana but the percentage of voters electing these guys is much higher than 20%.

[-] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 32 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I'm from Louisiana. This person is referring to the abysmal voter turnout. They said 20% of the population, not 20% of the voters.

Given that only about 36% of the eligible voting population even turned out to vote, this is accurate.

With that turnout it literally only takes 20% of the population to enable shit like this.

[-] metaStatic@kbin.social 10 points 5 months ago

Australia had a bad turnout once and the illegitimate government got tired of being rightfully called illegitimate and said from now on everyone votes, and it helped a little bit.

[-] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 10 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

That might help here, except that Republicans actively label attempts to raise the voter turnout as a Democrat power grab, and Republicans are the only ones with any power. It'll never happen

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 37 points 5 months ago

Forcing kids to work without Lunch Breaks, Water Breaks or any Labor protections is called PROTECTING THE CHILDREN!

[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Only care about fetus, once born there is no reason to feedus

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 32 points 5 months ago

Fun fact: the Democratic governor’s term ran out, the MAGAt governor is in and the brake lines on the republiQan Cruelty Machine have been cut. Expect more insanity than normal.

[-] blarth@thelemmy.club 29 points 5 months ago

The extreme capitalists are just doing this kind of evil to see if they can at this point. They must get a good laugh out of it every time some crazy red state legislature hands them a victory they never even thought they had a chance of receiving.

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago

The extreme capitalists

I mean, capitalism is "profit at any cost".

Market economies — properly regulated — are great. Capitalism is their malignant form. And the amount of regulation needed for then to function properly could arguably be defined as market socialism.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 27 points 5 months ago

Folks in red states must love being shit on, but immigrants and blue city crime - never mind that there is way more crime in red states. So they get all scared and vote against their interests, over and over, and over.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 27 points 5 months ago

Remember folks: BoTh SiDeS!

...ffs

[-] frunch@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Wait--i thought this was the work of Democrats. You're telling me Republicans are trying to take away child workers' lunch breaks and pay them less??!?

That actually makes a lot more sense. The fuckers won't do anything to benefit the common citizen, they're too busy coming up with ways to fuck children and fuck with children's lives (I'm starting to understand their rationale behind the abortion ban, gotta keep the pipeline flowing)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 26 points 5 months ago

Yes it's time to boycott smoothie king

[-] Alto@kbin.social 15 points 5 months ago

Y'all can afford smoothie king? Last time I was there I think my smoothie cost something like $9, and that was pre-covid.

[-] Z4XC@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

They dropped half their flavors too, you either get generic protein shake or banana based fruit smoothie in 5 variations.

[-] bleistift2@feddit.de 23 points 5 months ago

This is giving so many Oliver Twist vibes that you’d think it’s a parody.

Usually these stories go like “Let’s give the child workers lunch breaks” and you find the mandatory “There should be no child labor in the first place” in the comments, next to a link to the orphan-crushing machine.

This feels like a meta-joke. Instead of adding a little good to something horrible, they add appalling to horrible. I actually checked if this was the onion posting or if the post is from April 1st, but no; it’s just the United States. XD Good luck to all of you.

[-] CyberDine@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago

The children yearn for the mines!

[-] thefluffiest@feddit.nl 17 points 5 months ago

How to bring back slavery without calling it that

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago

Yo gen alpha getting lined up for the slaughter rn jfc

[-] Granite@kbin.social 15 points 5 months ago

I really don’t understand why they’re so sinister.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ConstableJelly@midwest.social 14 points 5 months ago

There is some absolutely hilarious material in here, were it instead fictional.

First-term state Rep. Roger Wilder, R-Denham Springs, who sponsored the child labor measure and owns Smoothie King franchises across the Deep South, said he filed the bill in part because children want to work without having to take lunch breaks.

"I keep trying to give them lunch breaks but they insist on doing what's in the best interest my pocket lining!"

And my favorite, also from Roger Wilder:

“The wording is ‘We’re here to harm children.’ Give me a break," he said. "These are young adults.”

Could you imagine the delivery of this line, with just the right amount of pause after "give me a break" and the right expression to the camera if this were said on something like Parks and Rec?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Beaver@lemmy.ca 13 points 5 months ago

Republicans hate trans and cis kids alike. They were never pro life in the first place.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

Pro life, as long as those lives improve our stock portfolios.

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

Disgusting, our child labor force deserves lunch breaks.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 8 points 5 months ago

As long as they pay for that lunch! I will not sit by and watch my government feed hungry children!

[-] xhieron@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Workers of the world unite. Sit in. Strike. Seize the means of production.

Eventually enough will be enough, and that will be a terrible day.

No war but the class war.

[-] misspacific@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 5 months ago

i'm going to snap and i'm going to

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
461 points (99.1% liked)

politics

18930 readers
3082 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS