155
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SteefLem@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 37 points 2 months ago

Basically, this just encourages priests to silence their victims.

[-] Halasham@dormi.zone 18 points 2 months ago

Stop the country, no stop the fucking hemisphere, I want to get off.

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

If someone besides elon or one of his sociopathic peers put together a generation starship to colonize a new galaxy I’d sign up in a second

[-] Halasham@dormi.zone 6 points 2 months ago

We just have to convince a significant number of "rabble rousers" to sign up for a colony ship even if it is Elon's, then riot and overthrown the colonial authorities once we're far enough away he can't readily send reinforcements.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I’d much rather just tell the fruitcakes to go with Elon and the others.

Then we can start cleaning the place up

[-] Halasham@dormi.zone 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah, that would be nice. Unfortunately we have centuries of precedent that the owner class won't abandon something until they've wrong all profitability from it, some point after wringing any qualities of goodness from it perverting the whole of it to perverse profitability.

In order to be free revolting will be necessary, weather that be here or somewhere else.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

So… Mormons are fine?

[-] JayObey711@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Yea I mean do crimes not expire in the U.S.?

[-] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 months ago

Depends on the crime. You'll find most places have a statute of limitations only on certain crimes while other crimes (usually ones that cause grievous harm) don't.

[-] Halasham@dormi.zone 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

If they're by the powerful: They do, and almost immediately after committing them. Corruption is legal here.

[-] Noodle07@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Land of the free (for a price)

[-] LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

If priests weren't allowed to sexually abuse minors then they wouldn't be priests!

[-] Mango@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Statute of limitations is still a thing.

[-] nehal3m@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 months ago

I mean sure, but whether or not you're a member of a club should have exactly not a damn thing to do with it.

[-] Liz@midwest.social 8 points 2 months ago

I haven't looked into this case. Are they actually making a specific ruling regarding priests, or is it just that this case involved priests? I could easily see headlines claiming the ruling to be more specific than it actually is, for clickbait reasons.

[-] zout@fedia.io 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It isn't that specific. The supreme court ruled that because it is hard to build a defence after so much time has passed, it is against the constitution to allow people to sue someone after the statute of limitations has passed. Failing to recognize it is even harder to prove you're a victim after such long time has passed.

[-] Mango@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

There is no statute of limitations on murder. There should also not be one on sexual assault, especially not when a child is assaulted.

[-] Mango@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I actually didn't know that!

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

There doesn’t appear to be A limitation for sexual assault of children. It might be lumped in with “personal injury” for one year, though.

Criminally, it’s 30 years starting when the victim is 18.

[-] Mango@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

RIP Priests.

I think it should definitely be shorter than that though just for practicality's sake. I didn't think it's likely to prove it disprove anything after so much time.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I’m okay if they don’t rest in peace.

There’s reasons to extend it, actually. Even if prosecution is harder, victims rarely come forward in otherwise “reasonable” time frames.

Especially when the victims are children who may not know what’s happening to them is even wrong.

[-] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 1 points 2 months ago

Usually you’re supposed to explain suggestions for other means of recourse for the victims.

this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2024
155 points (98.7% liked)

Atheism

3801 readers
34 users here now

Community Guide


Archive Today will help you look at paywalled content the way search engines see it.


Statement of Purpose

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Depending on severity, you might be warned before adverse action is taken.

Inadvisable


Application of warnings or bans will be subject to moderator discretion. Feel free to appeal. If changes to the guidelines are necessary, they will be adjusted.


If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a group that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of any other group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you you will be banned on sight.

Provable means able to provide proof to the moderation, and, if necessary, to the community.

 ~ /c/nostupidquestions

If you want your space listed in this sidebar and it is especially relevant to the atheist or skeptic communities, PM DancingPickle and we'll have a look!


Connect with Atheists

Help and Support Links

Streaming Media

This is mostly YouTube at the moment. Podcasts and similar media - especially on federated platforms - may also feature here.

Orgs, Blogs, Zines

Mainstream

Bibliography

Start here...

...proceed here.

Proselytize Religion

From Reddit

As a community with an interest in providing the best resources to its members, the following wiki links are provided as historical reference until we can establish our own.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS