this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
80 points (100.0% liked)

196

18134 readers
653 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Alt Text: Avi Wigderson, an Israeli-born mathematician, won what's known as "the Nobel Prize of computing" for his work on randomness.

all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You jest but the kind of stuff this guy works on is actually really fascinating

[–] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I believe it. I had a professor in college who said if he found a genie he would wish for 3 different sets of truly random data lol

[–] twack@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Would they still be random after the genie gave them to him?

[–] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Okay, Schrodinger

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The just followed the rabbit hole that started with reading "teh pengu1n of d00m"

[–] julianh@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

This was literally a talk this year at sigbovik https://twitch.tv/videos/2111841043 (skip to around 1hr 57 min)

[–] Deestan@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

It's a fascinating field! Simplified: Make a machine that it is impossible to guess the likely outcome of with odds larger than 50/50.

We are talking any tiny advantageous guess here. If I predict 50/50 that a coin will go heads up, slight imbalances will cause it to go heads on average 51 times out of 100 tosses. Play for a dollar a million times, and I'm rich.

And if I know roughly how you will toss the coin, I can improve my prediction another tiny amount by knowing which side was up when you lift it up to toss it.

The field is about making a process that successfuly hides information so I can't know what state the internal workings of the coin tosser is at any time. It has huge overlap with cryptography.

[–] slimarev92@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Makes sense, it's very hard for computers to be really random.