148

Disabled activist Neil Goodwin was arrested under the controversial Police, Crime, Sentencing, and Courts Act outside parliament

The below article is an opinion piece from Neil Goodwin, an activist who was arrested for blocking an entrance to parliament with his mobility scooter

[Click to listen to the article]

I’m in Westminster Magistrate’s Court at 10am on Wednesday 3 April, charged with blocking the entrance to parliament in my mobility scooter; I’m disabled, living with multiple sclerosis (MS). This is a bit of what I am hoping to tell the judge.

Protesting the climate crisis as a disabled person

On 19 July 2023, exactly a year on from the hottest day on record and the devastating Wennington wild fire, I travelled up to parliament to protest. It was a Wednesday, and Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) was on – the busiest day of the week for parliament and for the media who cover it.

I positioned myself in front of the carriage entrance, facing towards the road:

[Photo]

I had dressed up the basket on the front of my mobility scooter to look like it was on fire, with a warning sign on the from showing a disabled wheelchair user caught between a fire and a flood – referencing the Wennington wildfire exactly a year previously.

It also referenced the danger from flash flooding, which was tragically emphasised in the run up to my plea hearing by the death of an 83-year-old Chesterfield woman called Maureen Gilbert, who drowned in her home during Storm Babet, as she was unable to escape the rapidly rising water inside her terrace home owing to mobility problems.

I carried a placard with fake flames coming out of the top, that said, ‘I cannot run from a Climate Emergency’. Neither run literally, because of my disability, nor run from what I feel is my social responsibility to try and spotlight the implications of a climate emergency, not just for disabled communities, but for all vulnerable people – the old and the frail.

Cops provide a concerning response

I asked the first police officer who approached me, I believe my arresting officer, to turn on his body cam and record a safety announcement – me detailing my various disabilities.

I explained exactly why I was there, and I was told that I was liable to be arrested.

I remember asking one officer, I think my arresting officer, to see it not as an arrest, but a demonstration in how difficult it would be to save someone like me from a fire at a moment’s notice and carry me to the safety of a police cell. To see it as an exercise in preparedness, as it were – to which, I remember him saying:

If you were in a burning building, I’d throw you over my shoulder and carry you out.

I remember thinking, if you threw me over your shoulder, it would be like throwing a 13-stone ironing board over your shoulder, as my back and neck are almost entirely fused, and you’d probably drop me and/or break my neck in the process. It certainly wouldn’t be that quick and easy.

I was given every opportunity to leave, invited on numerous occasions to carry out my protest along the pavement, away from the entrance. But it felt right to remain just where I was: right in the middle of what they like to call the Sterile Zone.

Now prosecuting disabled people to acting ‘socially responsibly’

It’s strange, but I felt both my strongest and weakest at the same time. Surrounded by cops, one of whom apparently had a best friend with MS, yet none of whom could lay a finger on me, through fear of breaking something.

Who knew that fragility could become a super-power; the burning issue of climate change held aloft, perhaps barring the way of prime minister Rishi Sunak who’s motorcade would have usually swept past by then.

So, I was arrested under section 143 of the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Act 2011 which I thought was quite apt, as I sincerely believe that I was acting socially responsibly raising these urgent issues, especially for disabled, vulnerable and frail people; those who will be shoved onto the front line of this Tory government’s war against the weather.

I pleaded ‘not guilty’ because I don’t think that I did anything wrong. My mum told me to tell the judge that I had seen the error of my ways – when in fact some of us were beginning to feel a real terror in our days:

[Click through to article to watch video]

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BrotherL0v3@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

I'm here for it. The purpose of protesting is not to wave signs around in a way that is convinient and easy to ignore. Protests are supposed to disrupt things, to get the attention of people in power. There's supposed to be an implied threat: "Look at all these upset people who are willing to break the law. Be a real shame if they went from blocking traffic to dragging oil executives out of buildings!" A polite and legal protest may be great for movement building, but it's ultimately the same as asking nicely in terms of power and demands. His only mistake, the way I see it, was not bringing more people with him.

[-] DessertStorms@kbin.social 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yes, thank you!

His only mistake, the way I see it, was not bringing more people with him.

This is a really important point, I think I even posted something about this a while back but it's too late/early to go digging, but the gist is that disabled people were already isolated from society by design before covid, but over the past couple of years it has been made clear that most people don't consider us worth protecting and we have been isolated even further. Which also means we simply can't afford (and many, like myself just aren't able) to assemble in large numbers (or at all) because of how risky it is. It makes it that much easier to pick on us (currently, but very much historically too), but absolutely reflects the government's attitude to the general public - the harder it is to assemble, the less of a thereat to them we are, and the longer people ignore this and continue to bury their head in the sand as more of our rights are eroded, the easier it'll be to et them when their turn comes..

Having others there, and this is where allies really come in to play, could absolutely have helped, though I do see the merit to him just being there on his own on his scooter.

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 9 points 2 months ago

Who knew that fragility could become a super-power; the burning issue of climate change held aloft, perhaps barring the way of prime minister Rishi Sunak who’s motorcade would have usually swept past by then.

What a badass. I don't know how anyone can not respect that kind of stand

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 7 points 2 months ago

More than that - by getting arrested and taken to trial, you get the chance to take a swing at the system. That, along with the armed black panthers encouraging everyone plays by the same rules, is how segregation was ended and civil rights established

Let's say this guy wins - maybe the court finds he was justified, maybe they find police actions were inappropriate... The tiniest victory here can establish a precedent

It helps with publicity, but it also helps by forcing the state to justify its stance

[-] DessertStorms@kbin.social 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

forcing the state to justify its stance

This is it right there, the whole entire point that people here (and I'm sure elsewhere) have spent days deliberately missing.

This isn't about a wheelchair user getting arrested and then complaining that they arrested him, it's about a wheelchair user showing the world that not only are the emergency forces not trained or equipped to treat him and others like him equally or even properly in a case of emergency (be it arrest or rescue), but that they will sooner arrest you than allow you your civil rights under any excuse they can find (single person in scooter that can easily be got around is not disrupting and definitely not threatening anything). He wasn't even being a "nuisance" by having a bullhorn or shouting, he was literally just sat there holding a sign. Like those Russians who got arrested (E: for silently holding a blank sign) and the entire world called brave, and their government fascists (both true, but apply equally here).

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk -2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I was given every opportunity to leave, invited on numerous occasions to carry out my protest along the pavement, away from the entrance. But it felt right to remain just where I was: right in the middle of what they like to call the Sterile Zone.

Don't see the problem here. Bloke was asked to move like 3 metres because he was legitimately causing an obstruction to our parliament, refuses to move, all police could do was arrest at that point instead of shutting down parliament for the day. Police did the right thing.

I do support the sentiment behind his protest but come on, when you're causing an obstruction you can't complain about being arrested. You have a right to protest, not to cause an obstruction

[-] bane_killgrind@kbin.social 33 points 3 months ago

Complaining and getting a spotlight are the point, it's called civil disobedience...

[-] Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 months ago

None of us would've heard about this if he hadn't been blocking the door.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 points 3 months ago

Isn't part of the act though being arrested? 🤣

[-] AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Yeah it definitely is, it's weird that people are denying it. If he hadn't been arrested we wouldn't be reading this article.

[-] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Yes. An important aspect of civil disobedience is accepting the consequences in order to show how far the authority will go to shut down an activity.

this is such a braindead opinion, protests are supposed to distrupt things so that they get attention

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk -3 points 2 months ago

So he intended on getting arrested?

I didn't say that. don't put word into my mouth

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk -3 points 2 months ago

Would be weird to cause a disruption and expect them to not arrest you

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 0 points 2 months ago

When the police come up to you and ask you to move and you keep refusing until they arrest you, that's intentional. Risking would be if they arrested him first try with no warning.

[-] John_McMurray@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

(looks at pictures) shut the fuck up bootlicker.

this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2024
148 points (88.1% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

4689 readers
503 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS