142
submitted 3 months ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] takeda@lemmy.world 52 points 3 months ago

Is there anything that isn't a conspiracy for those idiots?

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

Jan 6 insurrection wasn’t a conspiracy

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 13 points 3 months ago

Jan 6th was an actual conspiracy, with people conspiring and everything.

It wasn't a conspiracy theory, as in fictional bullshit.

[-] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

Jan 6th was a conspiracy. Notice all those Trump hats? Antifa in disguise. Surely no Republican that came directly from a Trump rally walked down the street to the capitol.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Got it one, yes.

The comment was “is there anything that isn’t a conspiracy….”

They don’t believe jan6 was a conspiracy. It absolutely was, by they don’t see it that way.

[-] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Well I thought they did believe it was a conspiracy by Antifa to make it look like Republicans did it. Which isn't true.

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

That’s not what they believe.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

no, actually it kind of is.

You see, they believe there was a conspiracy to steal the election.

They don't recognize that trump was the one leading the conspiracy. therefore, the Jan 6 insurrection wasn't a conspiracy (in the sense that it was somehow justified, or acceptable.)

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 1 points 3 months ago

No, they think the violent parts were a false flag operation by liberals.

[-] vegeta@lemmy.world 49 points 3 months ago

Eggs are obviously woke. Look at how early roosters wake everyone up, especially the chickens that lay the eggs.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 37 points 3 months ago

“Forced” to respond. Could’ve just ignored the nonsense.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Their entire raison d'etre is to sell eggs. They can't NOT respond to something that potentially jeopardizes egg sales.

I'm of course talking about the White House here.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

The Egg White house.

[-] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 3 months ago

So Trump criticizes Biden for following a rule that he himself also followed. Fox seizes opportunity to create a false narrative, and their craven supporters latch on immediately, without question.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 16 points 3 months ago

The GOP got on Obama after they saw a picture of him with his feet up on the Oval Office desk. They were SHOCKED when pictures came out of almost every other President in the same pose.

They got on Obama for having rappers come to the White House, because rap is 'criminal music.' The were SHOCKED when someone showed them a movie where ronald reagan was an organized crime boss. [The Killers, with Lee Marvin, great movie]

[-] Flamangoman@leminal.space 3 points 3 months ago

So one of those egg council creeps got to you too huh!?!?

this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
142 points (94.4% liked)

politics

18080 readers
2916 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS