340
submitted 7 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 172 points 7 months ago

His star has really crashed and burned, hasn't it? He tried to put his kids in movies and they can't act and are also very weird, so no one went to see them. His wife cheated on him and laughed about it. On national TV. He slapped Chris Rock at the Oscars because he told a mean, but not horribly offensive joke. No wonder no one wants to give to their charity.

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 129 points 7 months ago

He slapped him because of HER reaction. Go look at the video. He's laughing just as much as the rest of the audience before the camera cuts away. She 100% got on his ass about it so then he went and did that shit.

[-] Patches@sh.itjust.works 22 points 7 months ago

Are you implying that makes it better? Or worse?

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 122 points 7 months ago

Worse. He wasn't even actually angry. He did it because the woman who laughed about cheating on him on national TV gave him a dirty look. Threw away his entire fucking career because for her.

[-] M500@lemmy.ml 18 points 7 months ago

To be fair, he is probably set for life anyway. And I think his career was spiraling anyway. What good things has he been in recently?

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I hear King Richard is good. I would say that might be a bit of a sign that is career wasn't really spiraling considering... You know... The night he slapped Chris Rock he was there to receive his very first Oscar in his entire career for his performance in that exact movie.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 10 points 7 months ago

Does it matter? We know he can drop a stellar performance with the right production. Fact is, Will Smith isn't going anywhere unless he retires, he can have a career as long as Morgan Freeman's if he gets his personal life in check.

[-] bitwaba@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

He'll be back.

Shit man, Mel Gibson disappeared for like 10 years after going all racist anti-semite on the phone yelling at his girlfriend that one time. Just laid low, then directed Hacksaw Ridge and everyone was just like "hey! He apologized, and this film was alright!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Hyperreality@kbin.social 62 points 7 months ago

The true moral of the story is to not believe Hollywood PR. Will Smith has been a media darling for decades. The guy could do no wrong.

Now it turns out he's just another deeply flawed rich person.

An important lesson for people who idolize celebrities and engage in parasocial relationships with them. Whether it's Kim Kardashian or Keanu Reeves, you have no idea of what they're really like, stop fooling yourself that you do.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 51 points 7 months ago

You take what you said about Keanu back rn

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 18 points 7 months ago

Keanu's been nothing but a real G since the 80's.

Will Smith has been a cocky dick the entire time — he just had charisma so people let it slide.

You shouldn't idolize any celebrity, period. Get some real heroes for fucks sake. Your local nursing home staff are more heroic than any celebrity. One gets fame and fortune. The other gets poverty and depression. Which takes more heroism to persevere through?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 34 points 7 months ago

To be fair, it sounds like it might have been a consensual open marriage.

Speaking of his children, does anybody remember Jaden Smith on Twitter posting super cringe shit? That was probably like a decade ago now

[-] dustyData@lemmy.world 84 points 7 months ago

Judging by Jada's book and Will's reactions on interviews, someone definitely forgot to tell him about the open marriage arrangement. Dude found out about it on live TV.

[-] Andrenikous@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago

I think he knew it was open he just didn’t want it to be. He is that whipped for whatever reason so he stays with her.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] can@sh.itjust.works 49 points 7 months ago

To be fair, it sounds like it might have been a consensual open marriage.

Retroactively maybe.

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 47 points 7 months ago

To be fair, it sounds like it might have been a consensual open marriage.

It was only consensual in the sense that if he didn't agree to it Jada would have run away with the children and hidden them in the Church of Scientology so he couldn't ever see them again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

Jayden was good in Pursuit of Happyness, idk about any other good role beyond that.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] nave@lemmy.ca 11 points 7 months ago

His star has really crashed and burned, hasn't it?

He’s still acting. The trailer for Bad Boys 4 came out just a couple days ago.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] vegeta@lemmy.world 123 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

He got in one little fight and the donors got scared

And said, "Wifey's cuckin' with her lover and her ass in the air"

[-] Bonehead@kbin.social 17 points 7 months ago
[-] Gamoc@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago
[-] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 75 points 7 months ago

Assaulting people does tend to make one less endearing.

[-] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago

Please donate to our... SMACK... charity. Oh, and keep my wife's motherfucking name, out yo motherfucking... Please donate... MOUTH.

[-] twinnie@feddit.uk 60 points 7 months ago

Maybe they could donate their own money.

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 35 points 7 months ago

Which is weird because I thought that’s how rich people used foundations named after themselves? I thought it was mostly self-funded and a way to lower their tax burden

[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 14 points 7 months ago

You lower your tax burden by as much as the taxes you would have otherwise paid on the money you gave to charity.

If you give 100$ that would have been taxed at 30%, you get a 30$ tax deduction, you're still down 70$.

[-] VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 7 months ago

Yeah, but if you control said foundation, you can then have it spent on things that you care about. It isn't the get out of tax free card that some people make it out to be, but it can probably be beneficial in some situations.

Is what I, someone who hasn't got the slightest clue about U.S. law, thinks.

load more comments (42 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 48 points 7 months ago

The post-slap life is a hard life

[-] qisope@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It's the post-slap life for us

It's the post-slap life for us

'Stead of treated

We get tricked

'Stead of kisses

We get kicked

It's the post-slap life

[-] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 46 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

If Will left Jada, and went full scorched earth on her and the scientologists (e.g. Leah Remini), We'd all love him again.

[-] tacosplease@lemmy.world 30 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I wouldn't. He's always been a cocky prick. You could see it come out in interviews sometimes.

He basically physically threatened Colbert while being interviewed on his show for his role in Ali. Will Smith is charming, so he's gotten away with a lot. The mask is off now though.

Edit: the Colbert interview was for Hancock, not Ali.

https://www.cc.com/video/ilejmp/the-colbert-report-will-smith

[-] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

Ali came out in 2001, while The Colbert Report didn't Debut until 2005. link?

[-] tacosplease@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago
[-] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 21 points 7 months ago

So when he made a comment about how Stephen must have been beaten up at some point? I mean. That's reaching. it was awkward, but imo really doesn't rise to "basically physically threatened." Especially since Colbert has had him on his shows repeatedly afterwards, you'd think that if Stephen didn't feel safe around him, probly wouldn't have him back on.

On another note, god I miss the Colbert Report. That was peak satire.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Traegert@lemm.ee 9 points 7 months ago

I watched the whole thing, no where in that does he threaten anyone. He's a pompous douche promoting his movie but he doesn't remotely threaten anyone

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 43 points 7 months ago

That must be a big slap in the face.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 39 points 7 months ago

I looked it up and today is the 2 year anniversary of The Slap. Doesn't seem like it's been that long.

[-] undercrust@lemmy.ca 31 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

That's because every day is torture in this late stage capitalist hellscape

[-] Moneo@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

We all know the saying, time flies when you're being tortured.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] toxicbubble@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

The Slappening

[-] Swarfega@lemm.ee 12 points 7 months ago

Did he go to this year's oscars?

[-] SomeoneElse@lemmy.ca 36 points 7 months ago

No, he voluntarily returned his membership to the academy and they banned him from attending for 10 years.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
340 points (95.9% liked)

News

23263 readers
3845 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS