101
submitted 1 year ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/news@lemmy.world
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Totendax@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago

TLDR: AI about to replace writers.

[-] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 year ago

That depends on the consumers really. If they enjoy the average template based content streaming services were pumping out over the last years then sure, but if people want to get back to the more original content, then something needs to change. 3 weeks is just not enough time to write a good story that used to take 6+ months to write.

[-] jepolitsch@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

I think that’s kinda the problem, plug and play content will be super easy to generate, which is what many streaming services seem to be prioritizing (production cost to engagement ratio)

[-] Crunkle_Foreskin@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

After the amount of capeshit that's been coming out of Hollywood in the past 10 years, this can only be a benefit.

[-] GunnarRunnar@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

You mean that it was the writers that pushed comic book movies and not the executives?

[-] Crunkle_Foreskin@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I don't doubt some of the execs made dreadful decisions (look at history: Alien 3, Suicide Squad are notable examples).

But writers should know the basics about dialogue.

Let AI generate the monthly hero releases. Let talented writers make thoughtful, provocative and beautiful film. It'll only make those experiences more special.

[-] GunnarRunnar@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty fucking sure they all know the basics of dialogue, no need to insult them. They are just working with impossible constraints when it comes to rewrites and such. Those creative decisions that are based on the whims of executives and audience testing. There's no love in the writing because there's no time to fall in love. These changes need to be happen on the top first.

And if you think ai writing will fix that... Whoo boy give it a couple of years and that snake will eat itself, especially if there's legal recognition that you can't use material without the creator's permission (which should happen).

[-] Crunkle_Foreskin@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Uhh, so that just happened...

[-] dudebro@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

They could always write something else.

But money!

[-] GunnarRunnar@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, can you believe they work for money?

[-] dudebro@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

How much money? That is the question.

[-] GunnarRunnar@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

You think the marvel writers are loaded?

[-] dudebro@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Globally speaking? Absolutely.

[-] GunnarRunnar@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Lol wat are you comparing them to people living below poverty line? You clearly want to win this argument so take it lol.

[-] dudebro@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Because I don't care about rich people wanting more money.

[-] Crunkle_Foreskin@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If there's any rich screenwriters on here who got sad because I criticised paying $20 for a ticket to watch their sub-par work, I do apologise.

Film critics in the 70s and 80s were pretty brutal and can roundly deconstruct incompetency better than I ever could.

[-] GunnarRunnar@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

I'm just saying you're targeting the wrong people with your criticism. I'm not saying the writing isn't shit, just that it's pretty understandable why it is that way and complaining like it's the writers' fault and not the studios' is playing into the studios' hands.

[-] aricene@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Sorry you had a subpar movie experience. I guess the only recourse is to hollow out a middle class profession and concentrate more power in the hands of billionaires.

I would suggest that the reason you were enticed into going to see the subpar movie with all its marketing, merchandising, and structural support may have more to do with corporate executives than a hard-as-nails creative profession with a $45,000 median salary.

[-] dudebro@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

There is no middle class and there never was.

There is ruling class and working class.

[-] dudebro@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Yeah. It's not like hollywood shits gold or anything.

Most of the crap that comes out of there is... crap. Maybe we'll actually see better content if we replace creators who have no integrity with AI that is conditioned to.

I don't care if chris pratt never gets another gig, lol.

[-] srwax@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I low-key wish I had a union to fight for me, to make sure my job doesn't get taken over by ai

[-] elbowdrop@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I find it very hard to find a new show to watch. There is a certain pinochle to some of my favorite shows. Thus I kinda just rotate what shows I watch. I try watching the serious ones, but the plots are boring and predictable and safe, boo. Every now and then something pops up, schitts creek or what we do in the shadows. But so many shows just miss the mark. Hopefully when that strike is over some truly wonderful stuff come out. You know the writers are brewing up some good stuff.

P.S. I hope they can fix the Magic the gathering story because right now it's very contradictory and aloof.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
101 points (99.0% liked)

News

23260 readers
3389 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS