274
submitted 1 year ago by dan1101@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world

Sound clip is pretty creepy.

all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 94 points 1 year ago

How long before EMI sues them for copyright infringement?

[-] dan1101@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago

"Please drink a confirmation can to hum this song to yourself."

[-] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

How anyone holds onto the notion that our minds aren't simply squishy, organic computers is beyond me.

[-] Neve8028@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago

I guess you could say that but brains are orders of magnitude more complex than any computer. Saying that they're "simply" organic computers is a huge understatement.

[-] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A TI-82, an Apple II, and a 48 core Xeon rack Server are all simply computers. It isn't insulting the rack server to declare that it and an Apple II are both simply computers, despite their orders of magnitude difference in processing power, capacity, utility, etc.

Humans are far too self-important and self-reverential. We think too much of ourselves. Just barely smart enough to split the Atom, after a couple hundred thousand years of build up throwing rocks and sticks at each other in the dirt, yet still dumb enough to immediately want to use it to boomie boom rival monkey tribe, ooh ooh, aah aah!

[-] Psythik@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Anybody who believes that out brains are simple organic computers seriously needs to try acid.

[-] lorez@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Complex but still organic computers. What else would they be? Soul vessels?

[-] iamtrashman1312@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

soul vessels

Let me know if they are, I need to respec pronto

[-] RealJoL@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Devil's advocate: Maybe acid just disables the "noise filtering" part of you organic computer.

[-] Gargleblaster@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago
[-] ratman150@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

Another Brick in the Wall Pt I according to the article. Woulda picked comfortably numb or something personally.

[-] FireWire400@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They actually don't specify what part so it's probably part II (aka. the most well known Pink Floyd song for some reason).

The clip almost makes it sound more like part of the intro to Run Like Hell, though, to my ear at least.

[-] DrPop@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean it's a pretty song that people like to sing along, but they don't know what it means.

[-] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

The first part is the intro to part I. The second part is too ambiguous to know. It's just the vocals saying "another brick in the wall". I didn't actually know there were two clips originally, so the second one is somewhat interesting.

[-] Zirconium@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Maybe the listeners thought of other songs while listening to it ?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

I hope they allowed them to get high first. That's a Pink Floyd requirement.

[-] loobkoob@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

I've always found listening to Pink Floyd is enough of a high already, personally!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Nick: Hey does anybody wanna come see The Wall with me on Saturday night? Thought I might try an experiment—see it straight once.

Ken: Don’t do it! You’ll regret it, man. Trust me.

-- Freaks and Geeks

[-] dan1101@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

That's how I feel about it too

[-] synceDD@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah only way to enjoy their music

[-] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Woah. This is pretty wild. I wonder if they could record the sound of my brain exploding while reading this article 🤯

[-] deranger@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Did you listen to the clip? It’s barely recognizable as any song.

[-] BertramDitore@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

I did, and it’s absolutely incredible. Keep in mind that the audio was recorded by sticking electrodes on a person’s brain, no speakers or anything. The fact that it is recognizable as music is amazing, but the fact that you can actually hear individual words is totally mind-blowing.

[-] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

It's recognizable only if you know what it's supposed to be. I don't think anyone could hear that and say "hey, that sounds like Another Brick in the Wall". I feel like the brain fills in what's missing and almost forces it to match the same pattern in our head. So it's definitely cool, but still clearly a science in its early days.

[-] Nepenthe@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Having not heard the song since I was maybe four, I was annoyed that they gave me the intended lyrics before I played it. I agree that most readers will be primed to hear it correctly despite sounding only new-age trippy on its own.

[-] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

They didn't give the intended lyrics. They just provided the name of the song I believe. Which happened to also be the lyrics. The second clip is a little more compelling as it includes vocals, so with that, it's definitely interesting.

[-] deranger@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That’s where I disagree, it’s not recognizable as music - at least not without prior prompting.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Make sure you're listening to the clip towards the middle of the article. The one from the top is unrecognizable to me.

[-] deranger@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Middle one is slightly better but far from music. It’s not mind blowing to me. If I didn’t have the suggestion I’d not guess this even a song.

[-] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

I find hard to say that any sound is far from music when music itself has no definition and varies immensely from percussion to electronica to dub to country to opera. There's that guy that plays songs with just whips. Something is music as long as you think it is really.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 11 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Scientists have reconstructed Pink Floyd’s Another Brick in the Wall by eavesdropping on people’s brainwaves – the first time a recognisable song has been decoded from recordings of electrical brain activity.

The hope is that doing so could ultimately help to restore the musicality of natural speech in patients who struggle to communicate because of disabling neurological conditions such as stroke or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis – the neurodegenerative disease that Stephen Hawking was diagnosed with.

Although members of the same laboratory had previously managed to decipher speech – and even silently imagined words – from brain recordings, “in general, all of these reconstruction attempts have had a robotic quality”, said Prof Robert Knight, a neurologist at the University of California in Berkeley, US, who conducted the study with the postdoctoral fellow Ludovic Bellier.

It contains a much bigger spectrum of things than limited phonemes in whatever language, that could add another dimension to an implantable speech decoder.”

The team analysed brain recordings from 29 patients as they were played an approximately three-minute segment of the Pink Floyd song, taken from their 1979 album The Wall.

This year, researchers led by Dr Alexander Huth at the University of Texas in Austin announced that they had managed to translate brain activity into a continuous stream of text using non-invasive MRI scan data.


I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Tolstoshev@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

They picked the right song for it. This technology will be used to ensure compliance.

[-] Nepenthe@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, I'm chalking it up to a blinding idealistic need to help, that those quoted seem so excited by this. On its face, yeah, this stands to do an untold amount of good for those who for one reason or another are unable to communicate. In addition to the toys they're talking about, like composing music (and I suppose other forms of art) from imagination rather than instruments/tools.

I find research into the ability to mechanically read and monitor thoughts to be a little horrifying. It's too much of a boon to think somebody wouldn't use it, and it's the last thing nobody could access.

[-] Tolstoshev@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

On the plus side this technology only works because the early brain processing for perception is well mapped out and straightforward to pick up.

We’re a long way from this to them being able to see that I’m thinking “I hope they don’t find my wife’s corpse in the back yard”.

[-] timtoon@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Now do Keep Talking

this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
274 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

59415 readers
1166 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS