76
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nayirah_testimony
Sound familiar?!?!
Oh, that reminds me, didn't NYTimes platform like a US Ambassador's kid to shit talk venezuela when all that was going down around 2016/2017?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_The_New_York_Times_controversies
Straight from the top
Russian Revolution, 1917–1920
Lippmann and Merz alleged that the newspaper referred to events that had not taken place, atrocities that did not exist, and that it reported no fewer than 91 times that the Bolshevik regime was on the verge of collapse. "The news about Russia is an example of what people wanted to see, not what happened," Lippmann and Merz wrote. "The main censor and the main propagandist was the hope and fear in the minds of reporters and editors."
Really makes you think
Look up Judith Miller
I did a project on this lady in my early college days for a public speaking class.
The instructor honestly thought I was going to go into journalism after my presentation.
Full-throated support for the invasion of Iraq
Someone have the info graphic for the Afghan sci-fi caves?
Do you mean Bin Laden's Mountain Fortress, the place that's totally real?
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
Listen to the site’s official podcast, Citations Needed
The Intercept and NYT love beefing with each other. Here's one where the NYT lied trying to depose Evo Morales https://theintercept.com/2020/06/08/the-nyt-admits-key-falsehoods-that-drove-last-years-coup-in-bolivia-falsehoods-peddled-by-the-u-s-its-media-and-the-nyt/
remember the Maine.
What's the recent scandal?
NYT did a big story about how Hamas allegedly weaponized sexual assault during operation Al-Aqsa Flood, but the person who did the story was not a journalist and every person she talked to in Israel gave her zero evidence and the main source they ended up quoting was an IOF propaganda mill that has a long history of just making shit up. It failed the most simple fact checking imaginable, stuff like "Hamas killed a pregnant woman" and then checking Israel's list of civilian deaths and not finding a single pregnant person.
As a cherry on top, many of the crimes that were attributed to Hamas in that piece and related journalism were actually crimes that were well documented - when the IOF committed them in Lebanon.
They brought in a woman who used to work for Israeli intelligence with absolutely zero journalism experience to write an expose on how Hamas SA'd and beheaded everyone they could.
We were this close, holds up fingers really close together, to a reality where the Israeli Occupation Forces had to go out and behead corpses to turn these false claims into a reality...
... instead we get a slightly less bad reality where there's an official corpse cum catching crew that we can joke about.
FLIGHT 007: THE REST OF THE STORY
spoiler
AS THE director of worldwide television for the U.S. Information Agency, I was summoned to a secret meeting at the State Department over the Labor Day weekend 13 years ago to discuss a TV production. Entering a small conference room through a heavy metal door with a combination lock at its center, I was given an audio tape. I was instructed to produce a video document based on the contents of the tape that would be shown two days later at the U.N. Security Council.
Korean Airlines Flight 007, with its 269 passengers and crew, had strayed off course over a Soviet missile installation in the far Pacific and was shot out of the sky by Maj. Gennady Osipovich, in his Sukhoi-15 fighter. Minute by minute, top secret American intelligence stations near the Soviet border had monitored Osipovich's pursuit of Flight 007 as it cruised on the last leg of its journey to Seoul, and its destruction at 2:26 p.m. Washington time, Aug. 31, 1983. Working with other producers, we fashioned a slick video which was played at the Security Council Sept. 6, and beamed around the world by satellite -- marking some thing of a new era of government-to-people diplomacy.
The video was powerful, effective and wrong.
This was referenced in Blowback Season 4.
What replaces 1980s-style disinformation in the future may make it seem wholesome by comparison, and the press must be ever more vigilant.
It turns out all you need to trick the audience is simply claiming you saw beheaded babies and sexual assault when it didn’t happen. No need for sophisticated spying devices.
There's an episode of The Orville, where the crew see what the political process is for a horribly xenophobic race... and its just AI generated videos of politicians saying and doing things they didn't do....
How's the series anyway, Seth McFarlane withstanding...
I first watched it years ago, years after it started, and was honestly pleasantly surprised.
I expected "Family Guy" but got a slightly more down to earth Star Trek. It can be a bit wishy-washy with its political/moral messaging at times but most of the time it felt like it was trying to be honest to the characters.
I liked it enough to watch it a few times over the years and i would recommend it if you dug ST:TNG.
Relevant interview with Former CIA Agent, John Stockton. Do your thing, hexreplybot.❤️
Didn’t know cia goons had drip
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:
this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024
76 points (100.0% liked)
askchapo
22747 readers
310 users here now
Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.
Rules:
-
Posts must ask a question.
-
If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.
-
Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.
-
Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS