this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
394 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19097 readers
1138 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The GOP made the same bargain the Prussian generals made in 1933 — and the consequence is their total destruction

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 102 points 9 months ago (3 children)

They already were...

trump is a giant piece of shit, but putting all the GOP's failures on trump makes it sound like when he goes away, everything will be fine.

That's as stupid as Biden thinking without Obama in office, they'd suddenly want to compromise and help Americans.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Though I do think if/when Trump goes away that things do get better. It's this old problem with nearly every movement is that without great organization and buraucracy, the movement dies with the charismatic leader. The MAGA cultists will certainly still be around but they'll find themselves with no one to rally around and god knows Trump and the GOP are doing nothing to systematize their movement because 1. they're not that organized and 2. they have no platform to systematize anyway.

So yeah I think you're right that the base problems are still there but much of the power they have now is in Trump and would go away with him.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 21 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Nah. Trump is a pretty bad symptom, but the whole party had been infected for a while. Hell, there could have easily been a Trump like candidate in 2012 if one of those candidates understood media like Trump did.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Trump doesn't understand shit. He just loves attention and will say things that get a reaction.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So in other words; he understands media.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago (2 children)

No, he's a malignant narcissist idiot savant self promoter.

Having the combination of a constant need for self-promotion, no self-awareness and absolute shamelessness is ideal for a cult leader, but it doesn't make him smart.

To quote one of the people who know his level of intelligence and understanding best, he's a fucking moron.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

We aren't saying he is smart, just that he understands media, especially compared to other Republican presidential candidates.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think it is sort of like how toddlers "understand" how to manipulate parents. Or cats and owners.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 points 9 months ago

That would be a good analogy. It isn't a great higher level understanding, but it is effective.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Understanding requires conscious reflection and analysis. He hasn't done either since the 80s at the latest.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No, he’s a malignant narcissist idiot savant self promoter.

That's what understanding media is, though.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

No. There's no "understanding" about it. It's as instinctive as a fish swimming or a wasp (either kind) ruining someone's day.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

I mean none of this happens in a vaccuum so of course Trump doesn't happen if the GOP hadn't aligned this electorate through fearmongering and culture war BS for decades. But the identity of the party today also depends on Trump - like, can you name one person in the GOP with the kind of sick charisma he has that could stoke the base the way he has? There are many that try but apparently Trump's ability to rile up the base is not easily replicated so without him around they have less influence over the base. That is why I think without him they would be weakened.

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

I agree with you and think infected is the correct term. Republicans are infected with dark money and Kompromat.

I think Trump is a nothing more than a hammer, a dull blunt instrument.

Putin is wielding the hammer.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

I doubt it. There's plenty of grifters in that circle ready to jump into the spotlight. Don Jr I'd imagine would be the next in line, followed by Kushner, and the like.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Though I do think if/when Trump goes away that things do get better

What is the most recent example of republicans "getting better"?

I'd like to say for Dems it was Clinton to Obama, but did it really?

The harsh reality is republicans have been in free fall for generations, and Dems just jumped out of the plane a couple minutes later.

The quality of both keeps dropping, and while D will always be better than R, that's obviously not enough.

So yeah I think you’re right that the base problems are still there but much of the power they have now is in Trump and would go away with him.

They said the same after Nixon, Reagan, HW Bush, and little Bush....

Their power is our political system where unpopulated states are overly represented on the federal level. At the bare minimum we need to unfreeze the House so at least one part is tied to population rather than number of states.

People in flyover states can have 10x the reprentation as someone from a populous state, and that's in the House.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Well I said 'things will get better' meaning overall I think the world is better and the GOP as it is without Trump has less of a grip on their electorate. I definitely don't think the GOP gets better as I said: 'the base problems are still there'.

[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 14 points 9 months ago

Yea I'm getting tired of the rose coloured glasses people have for conservatism. Like no, they were awful yesterday too.

[–] drislands@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

I advise you give the article a read. It's not blaming Trump for the GOP's failures as much as it's making it clear they've lost control of the party in a big way.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 71 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Republicans are, by their very nature, servile fuckwits.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

That is the nature of authoritarianism.

[–] nvvp@discuss.tchncs.de 57 points 9 months ago (4 children)

So much for the myth of American individualism; those who bray about it the loudest are the most ardent conformists, always adjusting their opinions to the party line and forever on the lookout for heresy among their peers. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a petty mob mentality par excellence, exemplifies this behavior: "Not only do we support President Trump, we support his policies, and any Republican that isn't willing to adapt [sic] these policies we are completely eradicating from the party."

This is the core of it. Even the ones who dared to criticize Trump after Jan. 6 walked it back once they realized the masses of his fans were still loyal to the orange crown. Trump will own the Republican party until he is dead because his fans won't turn on him under any circumstances.

[–] Wirrvogel@feddit.de 23 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Since his fans believe what they want to believe he might be alive forever, I mean there were people on a street waiting for J.F. Kennedy to come back because they believe he didn't die or something. I am not sure if they can get Trump out of the GOP ever again.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

John Jr, but your point stands.

[–] JungleJim@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 months ago

That's a scary thought, especially with deep fakes getting better all the time.

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

The emperor has no clothes, but the audience can't be bothered to read a elementary school level book.

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

The emperor has no clothes, but the audience can't be bothered to read a elementary school level book.

They heard there was a book about a naked man in the children’s section and shut down the library.

[–] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

I wish I were optimistic enough to believe his death will do anything other than further radicalize the party. Even if he choked to death on a Big Mac on live TV, they'd blame the Jews or athiests or antifa or immigrants or whomever the villain du jour is that week.

[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 1 points 9 months ago

Well, their implementation of it anyway. Tbf, their implementation of anything does not work:-P.

[–] Tristaniopsis@aussie.zone 43 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I’m not often in favour of the use of force, but the MAGA GOP and all its horrible circus are not doing anything in good faith and I do not think the game should continue if they aren’t going to play by the rules.

Imagine a basketball game where one team refused to dribble and used ladders to score, but the ref refused to do anything because of some made up technicalities.

[–] PwnTra1n@lemmy.world 35 points 9 months ago (1 children)

“Nowhere in the constitution does it say a dog can’t be president”

[–] Tristaniopsis@aussie.zone 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

“No no! It was a misspelling! They meant to say ‘In Sir’s Rectum-ist’.

Now my client, President Trump, does not, nor ever has liked anal sex! At least not in HIS Anus. So therefore he is still eligible to run for office once more!

Must I, your honour, bring up the fact that if you slightly misspell former President Barrack Obama’s name you can get ‘O-bum-a’?!?! And HE was given two terms in office even though his name was CLEARLY implicating him in butt-stuff!!!”

  • some Trump lawyer, soon.
[–] OpenStars@startrek.website 4 points 9 months ago

This is ridiculous! Why, every one of those words is perfectly spelled.

Cow coud a Trumfp law-persun du that? Hre in teh Unites States, we r great against!

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Imagine a basketball game where one team refused to dribble and used ladders to score

Isn't that just the Harlem Globetrotters?

[–] Tristaniopsis@aussie.zone 1 points 9 months ago

Make Harlem Great Again

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Except they couldn't cause the fans would get so pissed they'd probably riot in the stadium. Hmmm.....

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's no accident that Trump is a heavy favorite of professional wrestling fans.

[–] Tristaniopsis@aussie.zone 1 points 9 months ago

Well… something to do with brain damage ?

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 17 points 9 months ago

The GOP kind of asked for Trump to become this person. They're all sick people who take pleasure in exploiting people. They're all the same and can burn in hell.

[–] _sideffect@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

It was hidden deep inside them all along 😊

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 9 months ago (1 children)

He found all of the sexual deviants in the GOP, got photographic/digital forensic proof, and is blackmailing them?

[–] EchoCranium@lemmy.zip 7 points 9 months ago

Unless they are all closeted homosexuals, blackmail is useless at this point. They've seen that the base will punch the ticket for every "R" candidate regardless of any transgression aside from being gay or trying to work across the aisle.

[–] reverendz@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago (4 children)

It’s the natural evolution of capitalism to descend into imperialism and fascism. The republicans, or ‘classical liberals’ are just the vanguard, while the dems, or ‘neoliberals’ are the brake.

At best the dems are just slowing the speed of the descent. But without a systemic change, it’s inevitable.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

The republicans, or ‘classical liberals’ are just the vanguard, while the dems, or ‘neoliberals’ are the brake.

Neoliberals aren't the brake; they're the pawl to the fascists' ratchet. Their function isn't to slow it down, but rather to stop the left from pulling it back.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Fascism doesn't have a "revolutionary vanguard" to usher in its final form like communist theory. Read "Ur-Fascism" by Umberto Eco for a good rundown of how fascism takes hold.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago

Many fascist movements fade away with time. We tend to only focus on the ones that got power, because that's when things go to shit. The ones that just fade away are boring and don't get talked about much. Selection bias applied to history leads people to believe that there's inevitability to things when there really isn't.

Odds are Biden will win the election, Trump ends up in a prison cell, there's some violence by some of the MAGAs but it's easily put down, support for MAGA dies off. Of course this isn't inevitable either, even a low probability of Trump becoming President again is scary and people should make an effort to prevent that from happening.

Saying that Trump winning is inevitable is simply not true, and only serves to demotivate people that might otherwise make an effort to prevent that outcome.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Natural evolution? What? When has late stage capitalism happened before now? And the analogy doesn't even hold up. Whack comment.

[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The analogy might be questionable, but the logical and inevitable conclusion of capitalism (markets and the profit motive) is the continued accumulation of power/wealth by those who own the means of production.

Barring very strong regulation that somehow manages to avoid capture or a perpetually benevolent ruling class it becomes defacto fascism.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

A mix of greed, lack of morals, and sensitive kompromat serve as very efficient motivations

[–] drmeanfeel@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

They'd be lost without a boot to gag upon