250
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FoxyWaffles42@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago

$150 million fine for the $222 billion company. Seems about right

[-] aeternum@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

it's pretty sad, but these massive companies EXPECT fines, and put them in their budget. they don't give a fuck. it's just the cost of doing business.

[-] cultsuperstar@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah really. The average person overdrafts and they charge $35 for it, making that person even more poor.

[-] doctortofu@kbin.social 36 points 1 year ago

Why don't penalties for fraudulent or criminal practices START at 100% of all revenue generated by such prectices and go up from there? If the only penalty for stealing $1,000 was a $10 fine, I'd just keep stealing - why are companies expected to do otherwise?

[-] alaphic@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Because they can afford to buy legislators and we can't

[-] doctortofu@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Sigh, sad but true...

[-] yoyolll@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

According to the article, that’s what happened. They paid back the $103 million of fraudulent overdrafts and a $150 million fine on top of that as punishment.

[-] Achsonaja@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 year ago

Not a big enough fine. That’s just the cost of doing business to them.

[-] Chozo@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

$150 million? That's like what... five BofA overdraft fees?

[-] aeternum@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

there was a royal commission in australia into the banking industry, and there were a LOT of changes recently. probably about 2 years ago now. they're not allowed to charge exhorbitant fees anymore. the US needs one of those, or the equivalent.

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 year ago

Chump change for these crooks, and will be written off as the cost of business.

When we start giving bankers prison sentences, things will start to actually change.

[-] The_v@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

They really don't care about jail time that much easier. A couple of years of jail for 40 million? Sure.

The fine sould start out at 100% or more the profit from doing the crime.

A criminal act should also make the executives personal assets fully liable. The fine is paid out of the personal wealth of all executives involved in the crime first, combined with a mandatory termination of employment. Then out of any stock buybacks, dividends other payments to stockholders second. The finally out of company assets.

Basically follow the rules or face severe financial consequences for anyone who stands to profit from it.

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

They made $1.6 billion off overdraft fees in 2019...

[-] atyaz@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

██ █ ████ ██ █ ██ in a video game

[-] DougHolland@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Google tells me BofA's net worth is around $228-billion, so these fines and refunds add up to about 1/10th of 1% of the company's value.

What does the bank get for that money? No charges against anyone involved in at least tens of thousands of felonies, which seem quite similar to many thousands of earlier felonies nobody at the bank was charged with, in 2014 and 2022.

If I committed tens of thousands of felonies, repeatedly, could I get BofA's deal? I'm worth about $5,000, including my life savings and everything I own, so I'd have to pay a $5 fine.

[-] Poppa_Mo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I love my Credit Union. Been a victim of Wells Fargo in the past and it was delightful finally closing my accounts with them years ago. Haven't looked back. Haven't had any weird fees since.

Unfortunately, this still seems like a drop in the bucket vs. what they made off with.

[-] unexpected@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Whaat if only there was some way we could’ve guess. I thought BofA was a standup org :(

[-] Senokir@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I was really expecting a deez nuts joke for a second and then it occured to me that Bank of America can legitimately be shortened to BofA.

[-] cunning_bolt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I implore anyone with a banking account with a corporate bank to switch to a nearby credit union or AT LEAST look into it.. Ive been a customer at 3 credit unions and all have been great experiences. I cannot say the same about my Bank of America experience from 15 years ago that pushed me over to CUs.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
250 points (97.7% liked)

News

23305 readers
3662 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS