Well, I'll be absolutely goddamned if I'm not sick to death of seeing this dementia-addled sack of rotting shit attempting to ~~extort money from cowardly people/institutions protection racket style~~ file lawsuits that have only the most tenuous of connections to reality against anyone who looks at him wrong seeking in 'damages' sums that i can only think to describe as sheerly fucking delusional
Anyone else? Just me?
Also, I literally don't have even the faintest of clues what kind of fucking horrific, 'affront to God'-level shit that could be evidenced in just your tax returns being made public that would warrant $10b in damages being paid to you, but... Damn
Wait, I'm sorry, what part of either of these is awesome? I'm lost... If A is the case, whether she had sex with someone else or not is immaterial to the discussion. If she thinks OP is someone else, for all intents and purposes, he is, at least as far as our discussion goes, which makes her a cheater. If B is the case and OP indeed is okay with being cucked (whether it's by himself or not) I would argue that without both parties involved in the relationship having previously agreed to such an arrangement it is, once again, still infidelity and ergo decidedly not awesome.
Although, C) Ultimately none of this matters because D) OP wouldn't remember either way, regardless and E) none of this happened to begin with anyway, so... Shenanigans.