this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
609 points (98.7% liked)

politics

29401 readers
2397 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Senator’s bid to make US military support conditional on whether Israel is violating human rights in Gaza fails by 72 votes to 11

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 189 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Unsurprising. Thank you, Bernie, for trying.

[–] Nomecks@lemmy.ca 114 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Every time America is about to/in the process of making a mistake there's a video of Bernie Sanders warning everyone not to do it.

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 34 points 2 years ago

Our very own Cassandra of Troy.

[–] Rootiest@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Bernie is a national treasure, we don't deserve him

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 99 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Sanders is proof the US is working on a rigged system

he has had the people's interest at heart since he first started his political career in the 60s and not just the US citizens

[–] ExfilBravo@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago (2 children)

He will inspire a group of young people that will actually make the change when boomers die. So there's that.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago (13 children)

The two party thing has been going for 150 years. The top will not ever allow change in the regime.

Sanders almost won in 2016 but the DNC actively conspired against him to run Hillary. The Democrats will rather lose than allow the system to change.

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

The Democrats will rather lose than allow the system to change.

Prescient. I don’t think many centrist have realized that yet.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml 60 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Voting List for Anyone Interested

Fuck everyone that continues to support this genocide.

[–] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago

Important to note that this is a motion to table - so the "Yea" vote means they disagree with Bernie's resolution.

[–] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

39 Democrat senators (40 if you count Sinema) and 32 Republican senators.

I'd also like to remind people that 44 Democrats and 36 Republican senators voted to block the rail strike.

Procorporate trash. All of them. Fuck Joe Biden.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SpiceyDejarik@lemm.ee 46 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The measure was a first-of-its-kind tapping into a decades-old law that would require the US state department to, within 30 days, produce a report on whether the Israeli war effort in Gaza is violating human rights and international accords. If the administration failed to do so, US military aid to Israel, long assured without question, could be quickly halted.

Those senators must be pretty confident that a report would find human rights violations. Why would they oppose it otherwise?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago

if only democrats actually stood for what they say they stand for

we could of had eight years of bernie instead of eight years of further decline with trump and biden

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

if you think israel didn't do anything wrong, why oppose an investigation?

(also milosevic did the same thing in the 90s and was prosecuted for it by the icc - the us supported that then)

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Serbia bad, Israel good. Realpolitik

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

Problem is is that Serbia wasn't a nuclear power. That's the thing about prosecuting war criminals, they can't have a nuke that's tied to their vital signs.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

During the Sheikh Jarrah incident I contacted everyone who politically represents me and told them to re-evaluate how freely they fund Isreal, they all gave me lots of lip service telling me they will consider it when opportunities arise and every last one of them voted against this. I don't think I've ever in my life been accurately represented politically on a federal level, and the only reason that's not true locally is because I've testified to local government committees on things that actually made it to the state house floor.

[–] lettruthout@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I wish I could give you a hug. It's so useful to have your voice on this (and I assume other progressive matters?). There are many of us who feel the same way, and some of us are trying to regain our strength to try to improve the world again. Thanks.

[–] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Thank you. It's tough to fight being disheartened when you constantly feel looked over, or like some politicians margin of error. They act like they'd rather lose my vote then consider my prerogatives.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 years ago

Sigh, the US government never fails to disappoint.

[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

This is the stupidest timeline.

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 16 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Geopolitics overrides morality.

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 3 points 2 years ago

Concise and efficient, I like your answer.

[–] MaxVoltage@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

as is tradit

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The republicans voted against it because it's from him, and the democrats voted against it because they're courting the right.

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

Warren also voted with Sanders.

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'm supposed to believe the Dems that voted against this also care about saving democracy? They don't even care about basic human rights. We're going full speed into the worst timeline.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It sometimes feels like Bernie Sanders is the only American leader with an actual heart.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 9 points 2 years ago

I knew he was "my guy" when I finally realized who he was in 2016. There was a time I watched a lot of documentaries, and every time this scraggly haired old dude was shown in some random clip of Congress doing their thing in relation to the documentary, he was always on the right side of the argument. So I see Bernie Sanders running and I said "oh shit, it's that guy!"

No wonder the media demonizes him...

[–] trackcharlie@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What did anyone expect? Both sides take military industrial complex money

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Don't think the MIC is the deciding factor here, nor that the MIC particularly cares whether aid is attached to human rights scrutiny.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Proud of my Senator, Martin Heinrich. He did the right thing today.

[–] dan42O@infosec.pub 5 points 2 years ago

Is this an active coup that’s been playing out since 60s or when ever this shadowy government does? Is this the same thing like how one president get 1 free murder, no questions asked but like on large scales?

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Now there's two fascist parties...

[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 6 points 2 years ago

Always have been

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 2 years ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


US senators have defeated a measure, introduced by Bernie Sanders, that would have made military aid to Israel conditional on whether the Israeli government is violating human rights and international accords in its devastating war in Gaza.

“We must ensure that US aid is being used in accordance with human rights and our own laws,” Sanders said in a speech before the vote urging support for the resolution, lamenting what he described as the Senate’s failure to consider any measure looking at the war’s effect on civilians.

Sanders wrote on Twitter/X that his resolution directed the state department “to report on any human rights violations that may have occurred using US equipment in the Israeli military campaign in Gaza”, adding: “It should not be controversial to ask how US weapons are used.”

It would have forced the state department to provide a report within 30 days – and aid to Israel would be cut off if human rights violations were found.

Amid anti-war protests across the US, progressive representatives including Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar, Barbara Lee and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez have called for a ceasefire.

Speaking from the Republican side before the measure was introduced on Tuesday evening, South Carolina senator Lindsay Graham said that Hamas, the Islamist group, has “militarized” schools and hospitals in the territory by operating amongst them.


The original article contains 597 words, the summary contains 220 words. Saved 63%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›