"I've come to make an announcement; Kim Jong Un's a removed ass motherfucker, he pissed on my fucking wife. Thats right, he took his authoritarian quilly dick out and he pissed on my fucking wife, and he said his dick was "This big" and I said that's disgusting, so I'm making a callout post on my twitter dot com, Kim Jong Un, you've got a small dick, it's the size of this walnut except WAY smaller, and guess what? Here's what my dong looks like: PFFFT, THAT'S RIGHT, BABY. ALL POINTS, NO QUILLS, NO PILLOWS. Look at that, it looks like two balls and a bong. He fucked my wife so guess what? I'm gonna fuck the Earth. THAT'S RIGHT THIS IS WHAT YOU GET, MY SUPER LASER PISS! Except I'm not gonna piss on the earth. I'm gonna go higher. I'M PISSING ON THE MOON! HOW DO YOU LIKE THAT, OBAMA? I PISSED ON THE MOON YOU IDIOT! YOU HAVE 23 HOURS BEFORE THE PISS DROPLETS HIT THE FUCKING EARTH NOW GET OUT OF MY SIGHT BEFORE I PISS ON YOU TOO."

In my experience they just call you "uncivil" or a bot and smug away from the conversation.

"if you like EVIL COUNTRY so much, why don't you move there"

youve-activated-my-trap-card.jpg

"I wish, but sadly I don't earn enough in the US to be able to leave." "you got emigration money?"

No, it's a twist on that--they're combining "why don't you move there" with "North Korea intranet literally 1984", but with the punchline being that the North Koreans rather than being lamentably prevented from accessing Hexbear are instead being protected from our lackluster posting

I think if they were capable of self-reflection, those conservatives wouldn't be using a thought terminating cliche that sounds like it was made up by a pre-schooler.

Yeah the problem I see with this argument is that of course in an idealised world it would make sense to ban parts of the internet just like banning some kinds of oppinions is based irl.

But I think on the internet is a lot of garbage that has to be there so that people see it, because without allowing some garbage there is no discussion, no new values nor freedom.

I think any kind of left leaning ideology should enable non violent discourse as much as possible. Of course that would mean banning really bad things, but it would not mean complete restriction.

Also as a side note: Banning something does not kill the presence of it in society. In most cases it makes the issue worse than it is: You need more than just a ban, you need to convince people that you're right, not force them into beliving.

This is why fact based propaganda is valuable and a great way to stop populism.

Ok then show me why.

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

• yewtu.be
• inv.nadeko.net
• yt.artemislena.eu
• piped.video