918

Australia bans Nazi salute, swastika, other hate symbols in public as antisemitism spikes (www.cbsnews.com)

submitted 9 months ago by Menu@slrpnk.net to c/world@lemmy.world

159 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Australian lawmakers have banned the performance of the Nazi salute in public and outlawed the display or sale of Nazi hate symbols such as the swastika in landmark legislation that went into effect in the country Monday. The new laws also make the act of glorifying OR praising acts of terrorism a criminal offense.

The crime of publicly performing the Nazi salute or displaying the Nazi swastika is punishable by up to 12 months in prison, according to the Reuters news agency.

Mark Dreyfus, Australia's Attorney-General, said in a press release Monday that the laws — the first of their kind in the country — sent "a clear message: there is no place in Australia for acts and symbols that glorify the horrors of the Holocaust and terrorist acts."

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] WashedOver@lemmy.ca 157 points 9 months ago

"No one in Australia will be allowed to glorify or profit from acts and symbols that celebrate the Nazis and their evil ideology," the press release said.

Glad to see someone mention the Profiting part.

I've always suspected a lot of this was due to grifters stoking these A-holes up to increase sales of the flags, shirts, hats, etc.

The Brandon thing was a big boon to the Maga grifters as it created more new things one needs to collect to show your true level of being a Patriot.

You could then change out your Trump flag curtains for the Brandon stuff. Some are brave enough to change them out for the Nazis stuff when the time is right too. It completes the set when combined with the Southern Surrender flags as your curtains or bath towel.

[-] Fisk400@feddit.nu 29 points 9 months ago

I suspect that is also why their memes are quite slow to cycle trough. A lot of prolific figures need to sell their stock of stupid tat before they can move on to new things.

load more comments (3 replies)

[-] Chiyo@lemmy.world 65 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese condemned the reports of the chants as "horrific" and "appealing" at the time of the incident.

You mean “appalling”, right? Hope that was a typo.

[-] sab@kbin.social 42 points 9 months ago

Solid typo on the side of CBS. Or, alternatively, a surprising amount of honesty from an Australian politician.

[-] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 14 points 9 months ago

Like a gay fundie describing Chris Hemsworth: "horrifically appealing!"

[-] MelastSB@sh.itjust.works 17 points 9 months ago

There is a typo, he meant "terrific" not "horrific"

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] yZmHGnHnaB@sh.itjust.works 57 points 9 months ago

Good. We should do the same in the US too.

[-] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 37 points 9 months ago

Should do the same in every nation on earth, nazism cannot be allowed to flourish again. The cost of life is too high

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 28 points 9 months ago

And Canada should as well.

load more comments (5 replies)

[-] Lemminary@lemmy.world 27 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It's weird that I have to say this but this should also be done in Latin America.

Like, no, you're not Aryan, you're just pale. And you-- you're not even pale, wtf? You'd be the first one in the gas chambers, Pedro Contreras!

[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 12 points 9 months ago

This reminds me of that black white supremacist skit.

[-] Archer@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Then Chapelle got rich and decided to go full right wing

load more comments (3 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (4 replies)

load more comments (22 replies)

[-] soda3x@lemmy.world 49 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

What implications does this have on media using the swastika? I know that for games like Wolfenstein the swastika is everywhere and while it doesn't really retract from the experience by being absent, it would be really strange for that to suddenly not be OK, especially in the context of Wolfenstein where you're tearing the Nazis a new one

[-] ours@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago

German and Austrian versions of the new Wolfenstein games have swastikas and such removed/replaced.

I remember being pissed off the version sold on Steam to Switzerland was the censored version for no reason other than Switzerland is often stuffed with German and Austrian markets. When I blast sci-fi Nazis to bits, I prefer they look authentic.

[-] 9715698@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

Since the last Wolfenstein game was released, the law has been changed in Germany lifting the total ban on Swastikas in video games.

I don't recall any more recent WWII games where I've seen a swastika though.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (3 replies)

[-] DillyDaily@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

The actual law bans using the swastika to "glorify or profit from Nazi idiology".

Wolfenstein would not be impacted by the ban because at the core of the gameplay, the Nazis are the bad guys. It does not glorify the Nazis or celebrate them.

Sure Bathesda is profiting from the game, but they aren't profiting from the glorification of Nazi idiology, they're profiting from people's desire to shoot zombie Nazis in the face.

[-] Menu@slrpnk.net 10 points 9 months ago

It should becovered by freedom of art.

load more comments (4 replies)

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 44 points 9 months ago

Good for Australia.

[-] yamanii@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago

Surprised they weren't banned.

[-] throwwyacc@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

Probably because it hadn't been an issue until recently Strange times indeed

load more comments (3 replies)

[-] Silverseren@kbin.social 13 points 9 months ago

I mean, I'm fine with that. That seems like something that should have been done a while ago.

It's when they try and extend such things to saying any criticism of Israel is illegal, like what Germany is trying right now.

[-] lurch@sh.itjust.works 26 points 9 months ago

Germany is not doing that at all. Germans are just aware of their past and almost all will therefore be careful what they say and also point that out to other Germans. It is not forbidden to criticise Israel though and probably it never will be. Most Germans will just be the last to do it on their own individual initiative.

[-] Silverseren@kbin.social 11 points 9 months ago

In Germany, debate rages over a state policy to support Israel, no matter what

As Gaza is bombarded by Israeli forces, a polemic is raging in Germany over a state policy that makes criticism of Israel blasphemous because it's seen as antisemitic.

https://www.courthousenews.com/in-germany-debate-rages-over-a-state-policy-to-support-israel-no-matter-what/

[-] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

It’s not a crime to not support Israel, just taboo and against stated policy. Policy isn’t law though

[-] Menu@slrpnk.net 15 points 9 months ago

I would not say it's a taboo within the German population to speak out against the current Israeli government.

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

[-] Menu@slrpnk.net 10 points 9 months ago

Where did you get that from?

load more comments (6 replies)

load more comments

this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2024

918 points (98.6% liked)

World News

38956 readers

1527 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.