this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2026
72 points (100.0% liked)

politics

31502 readers
2217 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.blahaj.zone/c/us_politics@piefed.blahaj.zone/p/1038008/justice-department-charges-more-than-2-dozen-in-california-sweep-targeting-alleged

Federal authorities charged more than two dozen foreign nationals Monday in California as part of a statewide sweep targeting people who officials say have illegally registered and voted in U.S. elections.

The arrests are part of a Trump administration effort to root out noncitizen voting ahead of next month’s midterm elections, even though data shows that the problem is incredibly rare, difficult to prove and has not been shown to change the outcome of races.

They also reflect a further escalation in a simmering voter roll fight between the federal government and California that came into focus last week when the Justice Department sued the state and later warned that local election workers who knowingly process or tabulate ballots submitted by noncitizen voters are at risk of investigation and potential prosecution.

The Justice Department said the 28 people who were charged as part of a sweep dubbed Operation Protect the Vote are lawful permanent residents — but not U.S. citizens who are permitted to legally vote. They are charged with crimes including making false statements on a naturalization application and submitting fraudulent voter registrations.

“This causes real damage to real elections and real damage to American citizens,” Trent McCotter, the acting deputy attorney general at the Justice Department, said during a news conference in Los Angeles to announce the charges.

Much more in the article.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 39 points 3 days ago (5 children)

If the best they could do was 28 in California (the most populous state) you know that shit is barely happening at all. You’d have better luck hunting for gold.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

28 alleged and they've been lying about 80% of the time they've come to court lately so that's more like 5 people who arguably could have committed a crime and the verbiage is probably going to rule out conviction on the rest.

[–] daannii@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

And probably people Who were just confused about registering to vote.

I bet they got their driver's license renewed and the DMV clerk offered to register them to vote and they agreed.

Probably something like that.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Right?

Also, how many of them really weren't citizens? We can't really trust the Justice Department at this point. And we know from past experience that a lot of their claims about "violent fascist communist atheist terrorists" assaulting poor widdle innocent ICE officers were complete bullshit. And that some of the supposed illegal immigrants they picked up turned out to be American citizens who happened to have tanned or dark skin. So it stands to reason they are wrong on at least some of these cases too.

And how many of them voted for Democrats? In the past in other states, the large majority of the (admittedly very small) number of fraudulent voters voted for the GOP.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 3 days ago

This is like how DOGE claimed to find millions of dead people getting social security payments, and then it turned out they were only looking at one set of raw data before it's joined with other data when payments are made: https://apnews.com/article/social-security-payments-deceased-false-claims-doge-ed2885f5769f368853ac3615b4852cf7

When you have an agency who comes in with the intention of making a big headline that Trump can run with, they are going to overlook things so that things fit the narrative.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 11 points 3 days ago

Ah, but you see it's enough to create some sound bites for Fox News about "voter fraud found in California".

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

And these are accusations. In reality it's probably single digits.

[–] deeprlyeh@lemmus.org 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They just mad we keep catching Republican voter fraud. 28 also looks like a bazillion to MAGA.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago

More than the fingers and toes on most MAGA supporters.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

18 USC sec. 611 is a federal law that makes it a crime for a non-citizen to vote. But a federal judge in another district ruled that 611 is unconstitutional, because the constitution gives states the power to decide who can vote, subject to constraints (age 18, women, poll taxes, etc.)

Nothing in the constitution says you have to be a US citizen to vote in a federal election. That's just a rule that every state has adopted.

So I'm interested in whether they have actually charged 611 here or not.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 10 points 3 days ago

Wow that's fascinating, I had no idea.

Sounds like something states should be thinking about approving.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 5 points 3 days ago

The arrests are part of a Trump administration effort to root out noncitizen voting

I get the media but is everyone here really missing the point of this? It's not about noncitizen voting. They are saying "if you're a minority be careful, you may be accused of illegal voting". They want to scare the minority voters into sitting this one out.

[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

There are dozens of us!