this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2026
523 points (92.1% liked)

Memes

57176 readers
332 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DudleyMason@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

But how are landlords supposed to extort a living if there's plentiful government built housing? Did you monsters even think about your local landleech? They might have to go get jobs if we build thousands of identical apartments all over the country and made them available for 2-3% of average incomes.

[–] EmmiLime@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

I always tip my landlord. After all he's doing a good job fixing the leaks and molding. (Okay he hasn't done it in decades but he said "I will so stop asking and I am increasing rent by 3 times!" so he's still going to do it!)

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Squirrelknight@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

These apartments had working plumbing, something most of the people moving into them at the time had never had before. It was a huge step up to most people, regardless of how ugly the buildings look.

[–] BillCheddar@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The hardest part about getting anything done in America is that every decision has to be approved by people who aren't going to use the solution anyway.

School funding is decided by people who either don't have school-aged children or who send their kids to private schools. Social Security laws -- which only change to affect future generations of retirees, not current and soon-to retirees -- are decided by retirees.

And so, the ability to put up large apartment complexes (and let's make them nicer and include proper green space and all that) is decided by people who won't live there and who aren't going to walk, bike, or drive to the place where we would build the goddamn housing in the first place.

That's the part that riles me up the most: the number of people who will vote to stop someone else from getting something they need, because the voter doesn't agree with the choice or the outcome. Like, if we could affordably build houses for everyone, Karen P Asshat would vote yes. But ugly apartments? With all the apartment people living there? She votes no.

I've been in politics 35 years now and i have no answer for how to fix that. America is a nation of cockblockers, fundamentally.

[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Unless it's a data center, those seem to he pretty streamlined at getting approved and built.

[–] manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml 41 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The government of the PRC is planning to build 200,000 new public housing appartments in hongkong, tyranny i tells ya

[–] calmblue75@lemmy.ml 33 points 2 days ago

But at what cost???

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 27 points 2 days ago

why won't something think of the ~~children~~ investors!!!???

[–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Time for the CIA to activate the student riots one more time

[–] GarboDog@lemmy.world 59 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Honestly, the “commie blocks” are really good idea and should be built more often in areas with high homelessness and housing issues. Why should US taxes go to blowing up elementary schools/other people’s homes when it can go towards building homes and helping others in need?

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

why

The capitalist military industrial complex

[–] GarboDog@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Ooh fair enough lol

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›