this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2026
420 points (99.3% liked)

News

39667 readers
3109 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For-profit water corporations, federal cuts and climate crisis are ‘supercharging water rate hikes’, study co-author says

US households are paying 62% more for drinking water than they did a decade ago – outpacing inflation, grocery prices and household incomes, according to a new study.

Food & Water Watch, a Washington DC-based non-profit, analyzed 2025 billing data from the 500 largest community water systems in the US, which together serve about 155 million people, or 45% of the country’s population. The analysis compared current rates with data from a similar Food & Water Watch survey conducted in 2015. The study does not include wastewater or storm water charges, which are often billed separately from drinking water service.

In 2025, the average household using 60,000 gallons of water paid $531 for drinking water service, according to the study. However, costs varied widely, with annual bills ranging from $133 at the cheapest system to $1,416 at the most expensive.

all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Denvil@piefed.world 62 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Shocking how the graph of everything else can go up, and yet the pay rates trail behind at a snails pace

[–] 0tan0d@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

The wealth is gonna trickle down any day. Why else would we be keeping the tax rates so low for mega corps and the Uber wealthy?

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 21 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

That's about about a cent a gallon, i.e. negligible cost. A more impactful metric is how this affects the cost of goods and services. Water is largely consumed indirectly.

[–] StabbingSky@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

It's not a negligible cost increase when the prices are usually a fraction of a cent per gallon.

I pay $0.00335 per gallon, so an increase of $0.01 would mean my rate tripled.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org -4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You would still only pay a negligible amount of your income. The issue isn't residential but industry use becoming more expensive as water is largely consumed indirectly.

[–] StabbingSky@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My bill would go from $18 to $54, which is not a negligible amount for a lot of people.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A month? Why are you using so much water? Why is your budget this right in US and you are using so much water?

[–] StabbingSky@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The average daily water usage in the US is 100 gallons a day, or 3000 per billing cycle.

The $18 was for 2900 gallons of water for a two person household, so we actually used less than half of the average.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 1 points 2 weeks ago

Ok, with two people sharing that bill that's more sensible. But I question if that is a relevant cost in you household. You probably spend more than 2000$ a month. You would expect a below average consumption imsince lawns exist.

[–] aproposnix@piefed.social 10 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

From my experience, the water quality is terrible as well. Its why so many people in the US drink bottled water.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I boil and filter: Fuck plastic bottles!

Thinking about getting an osmosis system though.

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

If you do, which I very highly recommend because RO water genuinely tastes amazing (I don’t like tap water anymore, it’s gross and chemical-ly), especially out of stainless steel or glass drinkware, I encourage you to get one with a pump and a 6 gallon tank if you can find a place for the tank to go.

The pump reduces the wasted water to about 1:1 (non-pumped is about 4:1 wastewater to RO), and unless you really don’t use much water, 6 gallons is the way to go, especially if you have multiple people living there, or might do in the future. You might not need it often, but if you ever have company or get an aquarium or anything you’ll be so glad you have the big tank.

The 3 gallon tank I have is adequate for me alone, and would probably be ok for 2 people, but when I do drain it, which I do when making broths, soups, beer, big ice tea batches, etc. or even just filling jugs to take camping, it takes about 4 hours to refill (dont have pump driven, those might go faster, im not sure)

And if you get one, make sure you clean the tank annually. I did not know for half a decade that bleaching regularly, which is pretty easy to do, is important to prevent bacterial growth. Mmm tasty.

[–] myyass@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah I had rusty water come out sigh, they changed the chemicals they add in water. The local announcement was don't drink or shower with it for a couple weeks. Buying drinking water is cheaper than running a filtration system here.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That will vary based on your location.

[–] aproposnix@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My experience is from the Midwest. I definitely cannot speak for the rest of the country but from what I understand its similar throughout the country.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago

That has not been my experience at all as someone who has lived in quite a few states but none of them in the middle of the country.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 8 points 2 weeks ago
[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Thanks corrupt politicians and shady corporations! Surely an enraged populace will keep letting shit like this slide indefinitely, right???

Yeah, it'll be fine. Don't worry about doing the right thing.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 4 points 2 weeks ago

Part of the problem is that a lot of places pushed for privitizaton because of chronic disinvestment for decades. Politicians kept water costs low by doing the bare minimum to keep the system running and not investing in long term maintenance.

For them, selling to Suez made it easier for the towns to give someone else to blame for rising costs, even if the rising costs were higher than if the local officials showed actual leadership.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

We moved to our homestead 5 years ago. We finally had to buy water for the first time last year because Nova Scotia was under a massive drought. Spent $200 to get our well back up to where it was when we moved in. Felt like crap having to pay for water.

I can't imagine having a water bill.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

I'm doubly impacted by this. Moved from one suburb to another suburb and apparently the water down here is much more expensive because of the wastewater costs. I'm in an apartment paying $100/mo for water, and from my googling and other efforts, seems this is normal here. Absolutely sucks.

[–] danielfm123@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago

So what private equity controls all water? I bet black rock.

[–] Quexotic@infosec.pub 2 points 2 weeks ago

https://www.waterloop.org/a-2-trillion-wake-up-call-for-drinking-water/

This has a little bit of something to do with it too, not that I'm saying that corporate ownership of water utilities is a good thing, it's not, but we're in all kinds of different trouble.

[–] sunsofold@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

When did the oracle say the water wars were set to begin again?

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Already has and is already being used as weapon. Do you know where the source is of the River Ganges, a river so holy for many Indians? It's coming from the Tibetan plateau and China built dams which controls 70% of the flow. Similarly, Ethiopia is controlling the flow of the River Nile upstream and is pissing off Egypt.

Water scarcity will only get worse because of climate change.