this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2026
512 points (99.2% liked)

politics

31231 readers
2184 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Here is every Democrat who voted to take funding away from universities that boycott Israel:

  • Jake Auchincloss (Massachusetts)
  • Kathy Castor (Florida)
  • Gilbert Ray Cisneros Jr. (California)
  • Jim Costa (California)
  • Joe Courtney (Connecticut)
  • Henry Cuellar (Texas)
  • Donald G. Davis (North Carolina)
  • Lois Frankel (Florida)
  • Laura Gillen (New York)
  • Jared F. Golden (Maine)
  • Vicente Gonzalez (Texas)
  • Greg Landsman (Ohio)
  • George Latimer (New York)
  • Susie Lee (Nevada)
  • John W. Mannion (New York)
  • Jared Moskowitz (Florida)
  • Donald Norcross (New Jersey)
  • Jimmy Panetta (California)
  • Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (Washington)
  • Josh Riley (New York)
  • Bradley Scott Schneider (Illinois)
  • Hillary J. Scholten (Michigan)
  • Kim Schrier (Washington)
  • Brad Sherman (California)
  • Darren Soto (Florida)
  • Haley M. Stevens (Michigan)
  • Thomas R. Suozzi (New York)
  • Shri Thanedar (Michigan)
  • Dina Titus (Nevada)
  • Ritchie Torres (New York)
  • Juan Vargas (California)
  • Eugene Simon Vindman (Virginia)
  • Debbie Wasserman Schultz (Florida)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 76 points 3 weeks ago (16 children)

So the other day I asked what the Republican-lite supporters excuse for Democrats once again saving Republicans and then also voting to condemn socialism and now this.

So what's the excuse du jour for supporting fascism? Literally voting to punish speech here, what's the excuse?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean, don't vote for them...

But not voting for anyone else with a D by their name because of these asshats, is just going to let these asshats take over the party.

Most Americans don't get to vote in any election that has any of them on a ballot.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Counterpoint, if we don't vote for these D then we end up with an R in their district which is just worse in every way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ToiletFlushShowerScream@piefed.world 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I’m guessing it’s not about fascist ideology, and more about those AIPAC paid vacations they’ve already packed their luggage for. Doesn’t change that they are a piece of shit, only if they have corn or peanuts.

Okay - I just made myself gag.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Brings to mind that saying about sitting for dinner with 9 Nazis right?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I mean, mine's up there and in general most hate that but he's still far better than a Republican in his spot.

Hopefully next time we have a primary challenger worth voting for because his challenger voted for trump. Yeah....

So I'll put up with him for another two years because while his Israel bullshit sucks it's the better of the two options in almost any other issue on the table.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

And when does the whole "still better than nothing" stop being a viable option when you're still marching toward fascism with no meaningful resistance from the supposed opposition?

Honestly it's past time to stop voting for these Republican-lite, fascist enablers.

[–] gagcar@lemmus.org 11 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

And vote for whom? Republicans LOVE third party candidates because they tend to take more votes from democratic candidates. Run as an independent that is against the state of Israel and AIPAC will come in and fire over 30mil to your opponent and likely end your campaign in most states.

We do see more people running as or adjacent to the DSA so we will see how it turns out.

[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

What good is it if my state candidate is republican-lite and just sides with the GOP on shit like this?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Sorry but that's truly a moronic response. Because he sucks in this area I should let his truly worse Republican win?

Sure, trump beating kamala means everything is so much better now huh...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's never not a viable option. Voting takes a whole five minutes. There's literally no excuse to not participate and minimize damage. Whether you decide to do more after that is what this should influence, not whether you vote. If you choose to not vote then you're just a useful idiot.

Abstaining is propaganda pushed by Republicans. I don't know if you actually believe the message you're pushing or if you just bought the bullshit they sold you, but if you actually believe it then you're only harming your own cause. There's a reason this message gets spread so much, and it's because it's paid for. The only thing abstaining does is makes you feel superior while, in reality, you accomplish nothing.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (12 children)

And you're the useful idiot that Republican-lite love. Vote blue no matter who, never think about changing the status quo, never hold them accountable for their actions. Just keep on swimming. They love their moderate do nothing useful idiots.

And abstaining from voting as a form of protest is a time honored tradition. But sure go ahead and provide proof that Republicans are pushing abstaining from voting. They're pushing propaganda about the security of voting to enact laws curtailing the right to vote, plenty of evidence for that. Honestly, you sound like conspiracy theory Republican with your bought and paid message speil, going to blame it on George Soros next?

As far as you state abstaining/protest voting does nothing, I believe it does depending on how it's done. We've certainly seen how it has changed politics with Ross Perot and how it lead to MAGA. We've seen how it affected things recently with Dearborn abandon voters and how their stance has accelerated saying fuck AIPAC.

No thanks to your moderate paradise of slow walking fascism, I'll consider acceleration and live with the consequences sooner rather than later.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I would appreciate it if you didn't spout advice that, if followed accelerates my nation's descent into fascism. Thanks.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And, he knew you would vote that way. Good job!

[–] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

Allowing yourself to be manipulated by a shithead in hopes of getting rid of them later is generally preferable to shooting yourself in the foot and ending up with an even bigger shithead

[–] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

They do this to fracture the Dem party. Keep your adversaries in disarray.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Perky@fedia.io 24 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Oh look, Cuellar is being a sack of shit, what a huge surprise.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

He really is the Fetterman of the House.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, he's shit but I mean, Texas. Not saying he gets a pass but, Texas.

[–] el_twitto@lemmy.zip 21 points 3 weeks ago

Fuck every one of these mother fuckers.

[–] hoppeduponcoffee@lemmy.zip 20 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

32 of these are apparently up for re-election.

Any appropriate action to take here? As a North Carolinian, I’m stuck with Don Davis. I wonder if it’s any good to vote in these establishment Dems if they’re just going to go full GOP on us anyway. I’m not even sure if the alternative is going to be worse or better.

Fuck man, I wish 3rd parties were viable.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

I hear you man and unfortunately 3rd parties will never be viable with these kinds of Democrats around who won't support ranked choice or another system of voting.

If you have a couple of thousand like minded individuals, I'd say do a coordinated priest vote with a specific message of your refusing to vote for people who can't stand up to the GOP even for your 1st amendment rights like those in the Dearborn Abandon movement did.

Otherwise you'd just have to decide if it's worth it to you to hold your nose and slow walk the decent into fascism or go acceleration and live with the consequences of a quicker decent while continuing to fight for better candidates via progressives in the primaries. No real good options otherwise.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GolfFoxtrotLima@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, ranked choice voting can help with this problem somewhat

[–] MBech@feddit.dk 3 points 3 weeks ago

You're gonna have to get rid of everyone in charge in order for that to happen though...

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

In my unprofessional opinion, it is better to force their loss sooner rather than later because it’s going to happen anyways with those people. We shouldn’t be voting for them because they don’t vote on our side regardless.

The issue now of course is that the GOP is literally bat shit insane evil when previously they were just bat shit insane on the dl evil and it would’ve been a lot better to do it this way.

But still, It has to happen.

[–] droans@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

It's the House; all of them are up for re-election this year.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

Apparently genocide isn't actually bad as long as they give you money.

[–] Lorchedar@reddthat.com 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Damn. Mine's on the list (Panetta).

[–] AviAdi@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Hopefully he's on many people's ... now...

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Proud that my Rep, Melanie Stansbury is not on this list. I would have been shocked if she had been.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 weeks ago

Upset that my rep, Auchincloss is. I knew he would be.

Really I'm more upset that he won by 50 points.

[–] Casuls_Die_Thrice@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 weeks ago

Hmm; my rep's not on the list, but the one for a district adjacent to mine is.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Surprised resident shit bird Ed Case isn't on that list.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This one is the east side and full of republicans. Not surprising, but disappointing for Kim Shrier: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington's_8th_congressional_district

[–] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

She has been voting along AIPAC's lines for a while. Sadly she doesn't seem to have any serious challengers to unseat her. She is deffo a DINO.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AviAdi@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

These are fucking traitors and they should be ... and feathered like we used to do in the good old days. And then some

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›