PoastRotato

joined 3 years ago
[–] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

You might want to give "Gulf of America" a search, then

[–] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 27 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Imagine my surprise at your inability to feel shame

[–] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago

Lol this makes more sense. I thought the monk assumed "air fryer" was a slangy term for the sun

[–] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 185 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Certainly not. He uses Pope!_OS

[–] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Put some clothes on!

[–] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

She's dancing at a ball, and "having a ball"

[–] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Better luck next time, Austin Powers!

[–] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, there's also historical context to be considered here. Throughout history (and still today in many places) women have been treated as subhuman, or at least as lesser to men; in many cultures, married women were literally considered the chattel of their husbands. In that context, using the term "female" which almost explicitly carries no connotations of personhood feels a lot more like a hateful slur. I don't think "male" really carries that same historical baggage, though.

[–] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)

To add on, I've found that referring to women as "females" in anything other than formal or scientific contexts has adopted something of a sour taste in recent years. The practice is often associated with incel/misogynistic behavior and ideology, probably because it implicitly strips women of their personhood and reduces them to their sex. Put another way, both a female dog and a female human could be called a "female", but only one could be called a "woman".

That's my own two cents though, take them with a grain of salt.

[–] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Doomscrying

[–] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

I don't disagree; the full-grown adults who are complicit in the bullshit we've been subjected to absolutely deserve to be punished. But the comment I originally replied to demanded the death of "kids and pets" as well, which is plainly unhinged.

[–] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Everyone in this thread is suddenly really comfortable with hurting innocent people/animals as long as they get to see the ones they hate suffer. Where have I seen that before...?

 

Said by a merchant who gave my character a better deal than another party member because they were both halflings

view more: next ›