this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2026
137 points (100.0% liked)

memes

23911 readers
425 users here now

dank memes

Rules:

  1. All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.

  2. No unedited webcomics.

  3. Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in /c/slop

  4. Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.

  5. Follow the code of conduct.

  6. Tag OC at the end of your title and we'll probably pin it for a while if we see it.

  7. Recent reposts might be removed.

  8. Tagging OC with the hexbear watermark is praxis.

  9. No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] miz@hexbear.net 26 points 1 day ago

When one individual inflicts bodily injury upon another such that death results, we call the deed manslaughter; when the assailant knew in advance that the injury would be fatal, we call his deed murder. But when society places hundreds of proletarians in such a position that they inevitably meet a too early and an unnatural death, one which is quite as much a death by violence as that by the sword or bullet; when it deprives thousands of the necessaries of life, places them under conditions in which they cannot live – forces them, through the strong arm of the law, to remain in such conditions until that death ensues which is the inevitable consequence – knows that these thousands of victims must perish, and yet permits these conditions to remain, its deed is murder just as surely as the deed of the single individual; disguised, malicious murder, murder against which none can defend himself, which does not seem what it is, because no man sees the murderer, because the death of the victim seems a natural one, since the offence is more one of omission than of commission. But murder it remains.

—Friedrich Engels, Condition of the Working Class in England, 1845

[–] PraiseCorn@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Whats with China and communist bunnies??! doggirl-tears

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 10 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

They're from Year Hare Affair which is a Chinese animation depicting China's relationships with other countries (eagle and bear) through the cold war period. It's a fun show.

China likes to depict China as a bunny.

[–] hello_hello@hexbear.net 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Year Hare Affair is cute, though its anthropomorphizing/personification can get a bit problematic (regarding depicting Koreans as an ethnic slur) as well as misrepresenting/simplifying soviet assistance to China (there's a subplot about China having to invent nuclear weapons in spite of the USSR).

The show is still somehow going strong knight-nod

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 7 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

(there's a subplot about China having to invent nuclear weapons in spite of the USSR).

As I understand it, the Chinese were promised support in developing their nuclear program including a prototype but the USSR ended up only providing one single lecture which had incomplete information. Sino-Soviet split stuff that China is still salty about.

[–] hello_hello@hexbear.net 5 points 23 hours ago

That sounds about right. It's mostly that year hare affair can get nationalistic at points, which, for a webseries started by one guy, is pretty tame.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 day ago

Someone has to write a book called Capitalism: The White Legend. I feel like that'd be fire

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 11 points 1 day ago

Ahhhh yeah cool graph I wanna see the citations for it lol

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 4 points 22 hours ago

Unless there is an agreed upon metric for determining who is killed because of an ideology and who was killed within it and also accounting for stuff like revolutions and wars. Say, Vietnam everyone who died in that war could be counted as either or, the soldiers who fought for communism died from both, same for the soldiers fighting for capitalism. They died defending something and to go fight and get killed by the other thing. You could call it either way.

Capitalism still easily outweighs communism on the deaths it's responsible for and the fairness of those deaths being low. IE: people in opposition to revolution being killed or nazis in ww2, those are justified and should count as a credit if anything for the lives they saved with their actions.

When they go high, we go low.

[–] Runcible@hexbear.net 11 points 1 day ago

The difference is that communism is trying to help people, otherwise the deaths wouldn't be significant. Obviously...

[–] red_giant@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Communism score bar too low imo

[–] PoY@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

surely its in the trillions by now

[–] red_giant@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

72T is an aspirational goal

[–] EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net 4 points 22 hours ago

LimeWire Number

[–] RomCom1989@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 day ago

They go low,we go high