this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2026
37 points (86.3% liked)

196

6759 readers
1798 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Commented without looking at the instance, turns out I forgot to block ml when switching to piefed. Let's see how long this stays up lol.

EDIT: Turns out they're fine with my comment. I should probably be less insulted by that.

My comment text in case you want to copy/paste from it for some reason
It's not about voting for the lesser evil, but against the worse one. The way the United States is structured, which influences the way its people think about voting and vice versa, you are given only two options when voting for president:

  • Vote for the Democrat one
  • Vote for the Republican one

But... you might think you're clever and say "I should just vote for neither of them, nobody will stop me". If your state has RCV then put your preferred candidate as a first pick and just place Democrat before Republican. Problem solved, no more strategic voting. Unfortunately, precious few states have adopted this for any elections, let alone the presidency.

In states without RCV, there are 3 equivalent cases from your perspective:

  • Vote Republican: Increment their number by 1
    • Overall effect +1 for Republicans
  • Vote Democrat: Increment a threatening score by 1, thereby requiring Republicans to gain 1 more vote to win
    • Overall effect -1 for Republicans
  • Don't vote or vote for a non threatening party/candidate
    • Overall effect 0 for Republicans

Forgive me for assuming the reader wants to get Republicans (and Republican aligned Democrats) out of office. In this case, it is your responsibility to vote for the most threatening candidate. It's a sick trick of game theory, which is why RCV is so important.

all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] regdog@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

If Ranked Voting would be widely adopted in the US then that could end the 2 party system.

Which is why it will never happen.

[–] SleepyPie@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Vote for the lesser evil and do praxis, these are not remotely mutually exclusive

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 3 days ago (3 children)

i… honestly don’t understand how your reply is relevant to the original post in any way?

the original post is saying "in terms of their exploitation of the global south, the democrats and republicans are not meaningfully different", which i’m sorry to say, is true

so coming to a principled anti-imperialist (i.e. someone for whom anti-imperialism is one of if not the most important issue) and telling them "actually, voting for [imperialist party] is the best way to get rid of [imperialist party]"… what reaction are you expecting, genuinely?

[–] Estiar@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I get what you're saying but the Republicans did just remove all funding from USAID and PEPFAR, dooming millions in the global south to death by hunger and disease. And instead they are going for an extractive approach. (I know, like they weren't already, but the US wants to use hard power everywhere now which is the stupidest idea ever) I got the chance to speak with some USAID veterans and it isn't pretty. Even in the global South, the United States is losing a lot of favorability because of these cuts. That's what happens when you cut your soft power agency into pieces It's a choice between the Shit party and the Shit Lite party, but at least a number of decent people have leverage over the Shit Lite party.

[–] glilimith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 days ago

Exactly. ML folks act like voting for someone means supporting them, but in our system of minimal democracy, voting is harm reduction. Primary, protest, call your reps, etc, but when it comes time to vote, pick the candidate that's across the board merely bad instead of deranged.

Right?

The original meme didn't tell the reader what to do with this information. Why is not voting or voting for the "lesser evil" of the two the only options? Why are people so eager to defend a system they admit is broken?

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

that specific comment seems to be about the basic grasp of kindergarten mathematics that ml's have and it's application to democracy

they're not the sharpest tools

[–] doleo@lemmy.one 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But... you havent been banned. (?) You've been 'debated' and largely ignored. Why try to manufacture drama?

[–] jjj@piefed.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'm not trying to manufacture anything. I made this post to release some stress about having accidentally posted there, fully expecting destructive moderator action. It seems I didn't match any of their filters like BluJay320's "Ah, another Russian bot." comment.

Sorry if I did end up creating drama in spite of my intent.

[–] Zgierwoj@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 days ago

After a brief look at the post, doesn't seem like they have that much of a problem with it

[–] mk_machinist@lem.cochrun.xyz 2 points 3 days ago

This matches my experience exactly.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 2 points 3 days ago

Welcome to Piefed!